Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/display/dp_mst: Move all payload info into the atomic state"

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:51:04AM -0600, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> On 1/20/2023 11:46, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 04:50:44PM +0800, Wayne Lin wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 4d07b0bc403403438d9cf88450506240c5faf92f.
> > > 
> > > [Why]
> > > Changes cause regression on amdgpu mst.
> > > E.g.
> > > In fill_dc_mst_payload_table_from_drm(), amdgpu expects to add/remove payload
> > > one by one and call fill_dc_mst_payload_table_from_drm() to update the HW
> > > maintained payload table. But previous change tries to go through all the
> > > payloads in mst_state and update amdpug hw maintained table in once everytime
> > > driver only tries to add/remove a specific payload stream only. The newly
> > > design idea conflicts with the implementation in amdgpu nowadays.
> > > 
> > > [How]
> > > Revert this patch first. After addressing all regression problems caused by
> > > this previous patch, will add it back and adjust it.
> > 
> > Has there been any progress on this revert, or on fixing the underlying
> > problem ?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Guenter
> 
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> Wayne is OOO for CNY, but let me update you.
> 
> Harry has sent out this series which is a collection of proper fixes.
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/113125/
> 
> Once that's reviewed and accepted, 4 of them are applicable for 6.1.

Any hint on when those will be reviewed and accepted?  patchwork doesn't
show any activity on them, or at least I can't figure it out...

thanks,

greg k-h