AMD-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kuehling, Felix" <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	phasta@kernel.org, alexdeucher@gmail.com, simona.vetter@ffwll.ch,
	tursulin@ursulin.net, airlied@gmail.com, matthew.brost@intel.com
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/20] drm/amdgpu: fix KFD eviction fence enable_signaling path
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 12:46:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9df27e3-db16-4540-8c80-2769e8d9202a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6404ddfd-6bf0-4496-af0d-f5168e0c98d8@amd.com>

On 2025-11-13 09:37, Christian König wrote:
>>>> There is no need to enable-signaling (and trigger a preemption), if the eviction fence has already signaled.
>>> But when the evicted fence has already been signaled then enable_signaling is not called in the first place:
>>>
>>>           if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags))
>>>                   return false;
>>>
>>>           if (!was_set && fence->ops->enable_signaling) {
>>>                   trace_dma_fence_enable_signal(fence);
>>>
>>>                   if (!fence->ops->enable_signaling(fence)) {
>>> ...
>>>
>>> So the extra check is actually completely superfluous as far as I can see.
>> Thanks. I agree.
> Can I take that as reviewed-by you for this patch?

Yes.

Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>


>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
>
>> Regards,
>>    Felix
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>     Felix
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>      Felix
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> P.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>      drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c | 6 ------
>>>>>>>>>      1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c
>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c
>>>>>>>>> index 1ef758ac5076..09c919f72b6c 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -120,12 +120,6 @@ static bool amdkfd_fence_enable_signaling(struct
>>>>>>>>> dma_fence *f)
>>>>>>>>>      {
>>>>>>>>>          struct amdgpu_amdkfd_fence *fence =
>>>>>>>>> to_amdgpu_amdkfd_fence(f);
>>>>>>>>>      -    if (!fence)
>>>>>>>>> -        return false;
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>> -    if (dma_fence_is_signaled(f))
>>>>>>>>> -        return true;
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>          if (!fence->svm_bo) {
>>>>>>>>>              if
>>>>>>>>> (!kgd2kfd_schedule_evict_and_restore_process(fence->mm, f))
>>>>>>>>>                  return true;

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-13 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-31 13:16 Independence for dma_fences! v2 Christian König
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 01/20] dma-buf: cleanup dma_fence_describe v2 Christian König
2025-10-31 14:04   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 02/20] dma-buf: rework stub fence initialisation v2 Christian König
2025-10-31 14:05   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-04 15:01   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-06 13:16     ` Christian König
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 03/20] dma-buf: protected fence ops by RCU v2 Christian König
2025-10-31 14:29   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-06 13:14     ` Christian König
2025-11-07 11:09       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 04/20] dma-buf: detach fence ops on signal Christian König
2025-11-07 11:04   ` Philipp Stanner
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 05/20] dma-buf: inline spinlock for fence protection Christian König
2025-11-07 11:59   ` Philipp Stanner
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 06/20] dma-buf: use inline lock for the stub fence Christian König
2025-11-04 15:05   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 07/20] dma-buf: use inline lock for the dma-fence-array Christian König
2025-11-05  8:50   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-07 12:04   ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-12 13:53     ` Christian König
2025-11-12 14:00       ` Philipp Stanner
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 08/20] dma-buf: use inline lock for the dma-fence-chain Christian König
2025-11-04 15:08   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 09/20] drm/sched: use inline locks for the drm-sched-fence Christian König
2025-11-04 15:12   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-06 13:23     ` Christian König
2025-11-06 13:45       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-11-07  8:33     ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-12 13:58       ` Christian König
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 10/20] drm/amdgpu: clean up and unify hw fence handling Christian König
2025-11-04 15:14   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 11/20] drm/amdgpu: fix KFD eviction fence enable_signaling path Christian König
2025-11-04 16:28   ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-06 13:43     ` Christian König
2025-11-06 16:37       ` Kuehling, Felix
2025-11-06 16:46         ` Christian König
2025-11-06 17:07           ` Kuehling, Felix
2025-11-06 17:09             ` Christian König
2025-11-06 17:25               ` Kuehling, Felix
2025-11-13 14:37                 ` Christian König
2025-11-13 17:46                   ` Kuehling, Felix [this message]
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 12/20] drm/amdgpu: independence for the amdgpu_fence! Christian König
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 13/20] drm/amdgpu: independence for the amdgpu_eviction_fence! Christian König
2025-11-04 15:45   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 14/20] drm/amdgpu: independence for the amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence! Christian König
2025-11-04 15:45   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 15/20] drm/amdgpu: independence for the amdkfd_fence! Christian König
2025-10-31 14:34   ` Kuehling, Felix
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 16/20] drm/amdgpu: independence for the amdgpu_userq__fence! Christian König
2025-11-04 15:59   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 17/20] drm/xe: Disconnect the low hanging fences from Xe module Christian König
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 18/20] drm/xe: Drop HW fence slab Christian König
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 19/20] drm/xe: Promote xe_hw_fence_irq to an ref counted object Christian König
2025-10-31 13:16 ` [PATCH 20/20] drm/xe: Finish disconnect HW fences from module Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c9df27e3-db16-4540-8c80-2769e8d9202a@amd.com \
    --to=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=phasta@kernel.org \
    --cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox