From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: dont call csa_finish more than once
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:32:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1395995531.4175.3.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQ=zZo-f=w3KaWPC6TJ6TmoW+XOBHNwyYCSkbc1cnedihQ@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20140324_073736_101334_2EBC9F24)
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 07:37 +0100, Michal Kazior wrote:
> > Yeah I guess. What was the reason for this though? Here it's multi-vif?
> > Before I think we were talking about races?
>
> Before multi-vif if ieee80211_csa_finalize() failed and left
> csa_active==true driver could end up poking the csa_finalize_work()
> over and over again I guess?
I think the concern previously was about races, where finalize_work
doesn't actually get to run before the next beacon.
> For multi-vif csa using reservation there are 2 reasons:
> a) channel switches across interfaces may not be tightly
> synchronized. I did tests where 2 long (cs_count=100) channel switches
> were a few seconds apart. In that case driver poked csa_finalize work
> quite a lot resulting in a mess.
> b) my current approach has the following flow:
>
> 1. reserve_chanctx()
> 2. (some time later) driver calls csa_finish, and csa_finalize calls
> use_reserved_chanctx() because reserved_chanctx is set
> 3. (possibly some time later, for multi-vif reservations) csa_finalize
> is called again but this time without reserved_chanctx, so it verifies
> if bss_conf.chandef is csa_chandef (after successful reservation it
> should be).
>
> This means if driver would poke csa_finalize() more than once then
> use_reserved_chanctx() would be called again and again as a result.
Yeah but that seems better to catch in mac80211?
johannes
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-28 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-21 14:02 [PATCH] ath10k: dont call csa_finish more than once Michal Kazior
2014-03-21 14:17 ` Johannes Berg
2014-03-21 14:58 ` Michal Kazior
2014-03-21 15:07 ` Johannes Berg
2014-03-24 6:37 ` Michal Kazior
2014-03-28 8:32 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2014-03-25 8:00 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1395995531.4175.3.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox