From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: mrex@tranzeo.com
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ath10k tx99-like test mode?
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:21:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55074946.2040200@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <023401d0602b$0b3139a0$2193ace0$@tranzeo.com>
On 03/16/2015 01:51 PM, mrex@tranzeo.com wrote:
> Ben,
>
> The tx99 feature has the benefit of not needing any client or traffic to be
> passed for a power meter to measure. So it’s incredibly fast to test
> different rates and output power than having to wait for client to
> re-associate, pass traffic and adjust power meter to duty cycle (depending
> on how fancy the meter is). This is more applicable for calibration and
> evaluation than for adaption or protocol testing.
>
> Tx99 is better suited for calibration and FCC certification testing and not
> for testing things like adaptive modulation or what happens when mixed
> modulations are enabled. It cuts down on lab certification test time and
> complexity (lab engineers test a different wireless widget every day and not
> familiar with webGUI’s and config settings, etc). Tx99 often was more ‘raw’
> and didn’t behave the same as adaptive modulation algorithm, probably more
> so with more streams than 1 and 11b/g/n.
>
> So having a feature that can just output raw frames at full duty cycle at a
> specific rate and output power without client would be highly beneficial for
> lab testing and reduce test time and complexity for radio validation.
I tried to get ath10k firmware to send raw frames on a monitor interface,
but it seems it requires a peer of some sort before it will send frames,
and I had no real luck.
I'm imagine there is some way to make firmware able to do this, but I don't
know how to do that at this time.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-16 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-16 20:51 ath10k tx99-like test mode? mrex
2015-03-16 21:21 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2015-03-17 10:55 ` Simon Wunderlich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-16 12:21 Simon Wunderlich
2015-03-16 15:04 ` Ben Greear
2015-03-16 21:01 ` Pushpal Sidhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55074946.2040200@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mrex@tranzeo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox