ATH10K Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: mrex@tranzeo.com
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ath10k tx99-like test mode?
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:21:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55074946.2040200@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <023401d0602b$0b3139a0$2193ace0$@tranzeo.com>

On 03/16/2015 01:51 PM, mrex@tranzeo.com wrote:
> Ben,
> 
> The tx99 feature has the benefit of not needing any client or traffic to be
> passed for a power meter to measure.  So it’s incredibly fast to test
> different rates and output power than having to wait for client to
> re-associate, pass traffic and adjust power meter to duty cycle (depending
> on how fancy the meter is).  This is more applicable for calibration and
> evaluation than for adaption or protocol testing.
> 
> Tx99 is better suited for calibration and FCC certification testing and not
> for testing things like adaptive modulation or what happens when mixed
> modulations are enabled.  It cuts down on lab certification test time and
> complexity (lab engineers test a different wireless widget every day and not
> familiar with webGUI’s and config settings, etc).  Tx99 often was more ‘raw’
> and didn’t behave the same as adaptive modulation algorithm, probably more
> so with more streams than 1 and 11b/g/n.
> 
> So having a feature that can just output raw frames at full duty cycle at a
> specific rate and output power without client would be highly beneficial for
> lab testing and reduce test time and complexity for radio validation.

I tried to get ath10k firmware to send raw frames on a monitor interface,
but it seems it requires a peer of some sort before it will send frames,
and I had no real luck.

I'm imagine there is some way to make firmware able to do this, but I don't
know how to do that at this time.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-16 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-16 20:51 ath10k tx99-like test mode? mrex
2015-03-16 21:21 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2015-03-17 10:55   ` Simon Wunderlich
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-16 12:21 Simon Wunderlich
2015-03-16 15:04 ` Ben Greear
2015-03-16 21:01 ` Pushpal Sidhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55074946.2040200@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mrex@tranzeo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox