From: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ath10k "failed to install key for vdev 0 peer <mac>: -110"
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 08:47:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ba02350-3c8c-4664-9d68-67cb7e90eddb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r0apyjc3.fsf@kernel.org>
Hi Kalle,
On 8/15/24 7:03 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> So I have no resolution to this (trying to get the AP vendor to chase
>> it down), but I'm toying with the idea of trying to work around
>> whatever issue the AP is having when this occurs. The only thing I can
>> think of is that there is a 3 second delay between the authentication
>> and reassociation, and perhaps this is causing some timeout in the AP
>> and in turn the deauth.
>>
>> I'm wondering how long it should take to add/remove a key from the
>> firmware? 3 seconds seems very long, and I question if this timeout is
>> really necessary or was just chosen arbitrarily? Is this something
>> that could be lowered down to e.g. 1 second without negative impacts?
>> The code in question is in ath10k_install_key:
>>
>> ret = ath10k_send_key(arvif, key, cmd, macaddr, flags);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&ar->install_key_done, 3 * HZ);
>> if (time_left == 0)
>> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> I can't remember anymore but I'm guessing the 3s delay was chosen
> arbitrarily just to be on the safe side and not get unnecessary
> timeouts.
>
Thanks, I have reduced this to 1 second and have had it running on a
client for ~19 hours. Still am seeing the timeouts, but no more than
prior. And even with the timeouts the roams are successful.
After doing more looking in the spec I did see that there is
dot11ReassociationDeadline which may be coming into play here. Of course
these APs aren't advertising any TIE or even support FT resource
requests that so its impossible to know for sure, and hostapd AFAICT
doesn't enforce any deadlines even if you set it... But in any case the
timeout reduction is helping immensely and avoiding a disconnect.
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-15 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-12 13:11 ath10k "failed to install key for vdev 0 peer <mac>: -110" James Prestwood
2024-07-14 21:15 ` Felix Kaechele
2024-07-15 11:54 ` James Prestwood
2024-08-12 17:33 ` James Prestwood
2024-08-15 14:03 ` Kalle Valo
2024-08-15 15:47 ` James Prestwood [this message]
2024-08-15 15:58 ` Kalle Valo
2024-08-15 16:38 ` James Prestwood
2024-08-16 10:19 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-08-16 12:04 ` James Prestwood
2024-09-04 18:03 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-09-05 1:46 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-11-25 13:32 ` James Prestwood
2024-11-26 2:56 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-12-06 2:47 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-12-06 12:27 ` James Prestwood
2024-12-09 6:48 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-12-09 12:37 ` James Prestwood
2025-11-14 21:52 ` James Prestwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ba02350-3c8c-4664-9d68-67cb7e90eddb@gmail.com \
--to=prestwoj@gmail.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox