From: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
To: "open list:MEDIATEK MT76 WIRELESS LAN DRIVER"
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ath10k "failed to install key for vdev 0 peer <mac>: -110"
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:54:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c407064a-1c2f-46ec-ac57-32bf9cf6f5c6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e780560a-86eb-4189-ab5d-3bed3ee5825e@gmail.com>
I forgot to mention:
QCA6174 hw3.0 firmware WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00288-
The higher rate of frequency is happening on kernel 5.15, although as I
said only at one location with a different AP vendor. We have many other
5.15 devices with significantly less instances of this happening. I also
checked a few of our newer software releases using kernel 6.2, and the
timeout occurred there as well, but no real impact (no disconnect, no
assoc timeout).
On 7/12/24 6:11 AM, James Prestwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen this error mentioned on random forum posts, but its always
> associated with a kernel crash/warning or some very obvious negative
> behavior. I've noticed this occasionally and at one location very
> frequently during FT roaming, specifically just after CMD_ASSOCIATE is
> issued. For our company run networks I'm not seeing any negative
> behavior apart from a 3 second delay in sending the re-association
> frame since the kernel waits for this timeout. But we have some
> networks our clients run on that we do not own (different vendor), and
> we are seeing association timeouts after this error occurs and in some
> cases the AP is sending a deauthentication with reason code 8 instead
> of replying with a reassociation reply and an error status, which is
> quite odd.
>
> We are chasing down this with the vendor of these APs as well, but the
> behavior always happens after we see this key removal failure/timeout
> on the client side. So it would appear there is potentially a problem
> on both the client and AP. My guess is _something_ about the
> re-association frame changes when this error is encountered, but I
> cannot see how that would be the case. We are working to get PCAPs
> now, but its through a 3rd party, so that timing is out of my control.
>
> From the kernel code this error would appear innocuous, the old key is
> failing to be removed but it gets immediately replaced by the new key.
> And we don't see that addition failing. Am I understanding that logic
> correctly? I.e. this logic:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/mac80211/key.c#n503
>
>
> Below are a few kernel logs of the issue happening, some with the
> deauth being sent by the AP, some with just timeouts:
>
> --- No deauth frame sent, just association timeouts after the error ---
>
> Jul 11 00:05:30 kernel: wlan0: disconnect from AP <previous BSS> for
> new assoc to <new BSS>
> Jul 11 00:05:33 kernel: ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: failed to install key
> for vdev 0 peer <previous BSS>: -110
> Jul 11 00:05:33 kernel: wlan0: failed to remove key (0, <previous
> BSS>) from hardware (-110)
> Jul 11 00:05:33 kernel: wlan0: associate with <new BSS> (try 1/3)
> Jul 11 00:05:33 kernel: wlan0: associate with <new BSS> (try 2/3)
> Jul 11 00:05:33 kernel: wlan0: associate with <new BSS> (try 3/3)
> Jul 11 00:05:33 kernel: wlan0: association with <new BSS> timed out
> Jul 11 00:05:36 kernel: wlan0: authenticate with <new BSS>
> Jul 11 00:05:36 kernel: wlan0: send auth to <new BSS>a (try 1/3)
> Jul 11 00:05:36 kernel: wlan0: authenticated
> Jul 11 00:05:36 kernel: wlan0: associate with <new BSS> (try 1/3)
> Jul 11 00:05:36 kernel: wlan0: RX AssocResp from <new BSS>
> (capab=0x1111 status=0 aid=16)
> Jul 11 00:05:36 kernel: wlan0: associated
>
> --- Deauth frame sent amidst the association timeouts ---
>
> Jul 11 00:43:18 kernel: wlan0: disconnect from AP <previous BSS> for
> new assoc to <new BSS>
> Jul 11 00:43:21 kernel: ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: failed to install key
> for vdev 0 peer <previous BSS>: -110
> Jul 11 00:43:21 kernel: wlan0: failed to remove key (0, <previous
> BSS>) from hardware (-110)
> Jul 11 00:43:21 kernel: wlan0: associate with <new BSS> (try 1/3)
> Jul 11 00:43:21 kernel: wlan0: deauthenticated from <new BSS> while
> associating (Reason: 8=DISASSOC_STA_HAS_LEFT)
> Jul 11 00:43:24 kernel: wlan0: authenticate with <new BSS>
> Jul 11 00:43:24 kernel: wlan0: send auth to <new BSS> (try 1/3)
> Jul 11 00:43:24 kernel: wlan0: authenticated
> Jul 11 00:43:24 kernel: wlan0: associate with <new BSS> (try 1/3)
> Jul 11 00:43:24 kernel: wlan0: RX AssocResp from <new BSS>
> (capab=0x1111 status=0 aid=101)
> Jul 11 00:43:24 kernel: wlan0: associated
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-15 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-12 13:11 ath10k "failed to install key for vdev 0 peer <mac>: -110" James Prestwood
2024-07-14 21:15 ` Felix Kaechele
2024-07-15 11:54 ` James Prestwood [this message]
2024-08-12 17:33 ` James Prestwood
2024-08-15 14:03 ` Kalle Valo
2024-08-15 15:47 ` James Prestwood
2024-08-15 15:58 ` Kalle Valo
2024-08-15 16:38 ` James Prestwood
2024-08-16 10:19 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-08-16 12:04 ` James Prestwood
2024-09-04 18:03 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-09-05 1:46 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-11-25 13:32 ` James Prestwood
2024-11-26 2:56 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-12-06 2:47 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-12-06 12:27 ` James Prestwood
2024-12-09 6:48 ` Baochen Qiang
2024-12-09 12:37 ` James Prestwood
2025-11-14 21:52 ` James Prestwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c407064a-1c2f-46ec-ac57-32bf9cf6f5c6@gmail.com \
--to=prestwoj@gmail.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox