From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Rate vs Range graphs for ath10k through attentuator.
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:50:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vbt56g61.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53750D0D.4060106@candelatech.com> (Ben Greear's message of "Thu, 15 May 2014 11:53:01 -0700")
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> writes:
> Just FYI...here's a graph of a UDP upload test through an attenuator.
> The attenuator goes from 0 up to 95.5, though isolation is not perfect
> so even at highest attenuation a small bit of signal gets through.
>
> One interesting thing to me is that ath10k does so well at very hot
> signal strength. ath9k runs like crap with hot signal...
>
> AP is another of our systems, both are using my CT firmware, my 3.14.4+
> kernel, and WLE900VX NICs. 32 stations were created and associated
> on the station machine, but only one was actively sending any significant
> data. AP system had single active AP vdev, one station interface that was
> not connected. Traffic flow is station send to AP, AP sends back to station
> machine on 1Gbps wired Ethernet connection. Both systems are mobile core-i7
> CPU, 8GB RAM, etc.
>
> http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/
>
> Lots of graphs in the link above..the most useful ones are:
>
> http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/chart-0.png
>
> http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/chart-30.png
>
> The throughput is a bit spikey, possibly because I am only doing 5 second throughput
> tests. Will run a 30-second one some day and hope that smooths out.
Cool charts. Was this over the air or with cables?
--
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-16 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-15 18:53 Rate vs Range graphs for ath10k through attentuator Ben Greear
2014-05-16 12:50 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2014-05-16 12:57 ` Ben Greear
2014-05-16 13:04 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vbt56g61.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox