* [PATCH net-next] ath11k: fix uninitialized return in ath11k_spectral_process_data()
@ 2020-06-19 14:29 Dan Carpenter
[not found] ` <87a70vf923.fsf@codeaurora.org>
2020-09-09 6:49 ` Kalle Valo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2020-06-19 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kalle Valo, Karthikeyan Periyasamy
Cc: Jakub Kicinski, kernel-janitors, linux-wireless, ath11k
There is a success path where "ret" isn't initialized where we never
have a ATH11K_SPECTRAL_TAG_SCAN_SEARCH and then ret isn't initialized.
Fixes: 9d11b7bff950 ("ath11k: add support for spectral scan")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c
index 1c5d65bb411f..bfbf905f7507 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static int ath11k_spectral_process_data(struct ath11k *ar,
u32 data_len, i;
u8 sign, tag;
int tlv_len, sample_sz;
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
bool quit = false;
spin_lock_bh(&ar->spectral.lock);
--
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread[parent not found: <87a70vf923.fsf@codeaurora.org>]
[parent not found: <20200622171846.GE4151@kadam>]
* Re: [PATCH net-next] ath11k: fix uninitialized return in ath11k_spectral_process_data() [not found] ` <20200622171846.GE4151@kadam> @ 2020-09-07 16:56 ` Kalle Valo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2020-09-07 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Carpenter Cc: linux-wireless, Jakub Kicinski, kernel-janitors, Karthikeyan Periyasamy, ath11k Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> writes: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 05:51:16PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> writes: >> >> > There is a success path where "ret" isn't initialized where we never >> > have a ATH11K_SPECTRAL_TAG_SCAN_SEARCH and then ret isn't initialized. >> > >> > Fixes: 9d11b7bff950 ("ath11k: add support for spectral scan") >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> >> > --- >> > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c | 2 +- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c >> > index 1c5d65bb411f..bfbf905f7507 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c >> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c >> > @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static int ath11k_spectral_process_data(struct ath11k *ar, >> > u32 data_len, i; >> > u8 sign, tag; >> > int tlv_len, sample_sz; >> > - int ret; >> > + int ret = 0; >> > bool quit = false; >> >> I try to avoid initialising ret variables so I would like find another >> way. What about doing this (completely untested!) in the end of the >> function: >> >> return 0; >> >> err: >> kfree(fft_sample); >> unlock: >> spin_unlock_bh(&ar->spectral.lock); >> return ret; > > I normally avoid it as well... If I were to redo this patch, I would > probably do: > > ret = 0; > err: > kfree(fft_sample); > unlock: > spin_unlock_bh(&ar->spectral.lock); > return ret; > > Would that be better? Ah, my proposal was buggy. So yes, this is definitely better :) I changed now the patch in the pending branch, please check: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=586f8e6779fa75ade112cb48606794e034e0ff1d -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches -- ath11k mailing list ath11k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next] ath11k: fix uninitialized return in ath11k_spectral_process_data() 2020-06-19 14:29 [PATCH net-next] ath11k: fix uninitialized return in ath11k_spectral_process_data() Dan Carpenter [not found] ` <87a70vf923.fsf@codeaurora.org> @ 2020-09-09 6:49 ` Kalle Valo 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2020-09-09 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dan Carpenter Cc: linux-wireless, Jakub Kicinski, kernel-janitors, Karthikeyan Periyasamy, ath11k Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote: > There is a success path where "ret" isn't initialized where we never > have a ATH11K_SPECTRAL_TAG_SCAN_SEARCH and then ret isn't initialized. > > Fixes: 9d11b7bff950 ("ath11k: add support for spectral scan") > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks. c7187acc3cd0 ath11k: fix uninitialized return in ath11k_spectral_process_data() -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11614313/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches -- ath11k mailing list ath11k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-09 6:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-19 14:29 [PATCH net-next] ath11k: fix uninitialized return in ath11k_spectral_process_data() Dan Carpenter
[not found] ` <87a70vf923.fsf@codeaurora.org>
[not found] ` <20200622171846.GE4151@kadam>
2020-09-07 16:56 ` Kalle Valo
2020-09-09 6:49 ` Kalle Valo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox