Performance of WCN7850

Performance of WCN7850

[Jun Nie]

Hi,

I am trying to maximize the bandwidth of WCN7850. Does anyone know the
performance status of WCN7850 in mainline? It's about 160Mbps in 6GHz
band and ~600Mbps in 5GHz band on sm8650 platform in my test. The
firmware is from below links:
https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0/board.bin
https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0/regdb.bin

While it is ~940Mbps in both 5GHz and 6GHz band with
Android/linux6.1.25, . But the firmware names are different per log,
amss20.bin on Android. Not sure whether the driver is totally
different for Android/linux6.1.25 and mainline.

Do you have any idea that the low performance on mainline is due to
driver difference or TX/RX power configuration, or firmware version?

Thanks for your input!
Jun

Re: Performance of WCN7850

[Jeff Johnson]

On 2/27/2024 5:54 AM, Jun Nie wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am trying to maximize the bandwidth of WCN7850. Does anyone know the
> performance status of WCN7850 in mainline? It's about 160Mbps in 6GHz
> band and ~600Mbps in 5GHz band on sm8650 platform in my test. The
> firmware is from below links:
> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0/board.bin
> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0/regdb.bin
> 
> While it is ~940Mbps in both 5GHz and 6GHz band with
> Android/linux6.1.25, . But the firmware names are different per log,
> amss20.bin on Android. Not sure whether the driver is totally
> different for Android/linux6.1.25 and mainline.

The drivers are different. Android uses the out-of-tree qcacld-3.0 driver.

> Do you have any idea that the low performance on mainline is due to
> driver difference or TX/RX power configuration, or firmware version?

My expectation is that the upstream mac80211 datapath will never achieve
the same throughput as a custom datapath. That said, the ath12k driver
is still under very active development, and performance tuning will
occur in the future.

/jeff

Re: Performance of WCN7850

[Jun Nie]

Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> 于2024年2月27日周二 23:23写道：
>
> On 2/27/2024 5:54 AM, Jun Nie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to maximize the bandwidth of WCN7850. Does anyone know the
> > performance status of WCN7850 in mainline? It's about 160Mbps in 6GHz
> > band and ~600Mbps in 5GHz band on sm8650 platform in my test. The
> > firmware is from below links:
> > https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0/board.bin
> > https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0/regdb.bin
> >
> > While it is ~940Mbps in both 5GHz and 6GHz band with
> > Android/linux6.1.25, . But the firmware names are different per log,
> > amss20.bin on Android. Not sure whether the driver is totally
> > different for Android/linux6.1.25 and mainline.
>
> The drivers are different. Android uses the out-of-tree qcacld-3.0 driver.
>
> > Do you have any idea that the low performance on mainline is due to
> > driver difference or TX/RX power configuration, or firmware version?
>
> My expectation is that the upstream mac80211 datapath will never achieve
> the same throughput as a custom datapath. That said, the ath12k driver
> is still under very active development, and performance tuning will
> occur in the future.
>
> /jeff
>

Hi Jeff,

Thanks for your input! Do you know where I can find a tool to tune the power
level of 6GHz? Seems that below patch supports it. But I am not familiar with
WiFi software actually.
342527f35338 wifi: ath12k: Add support to parse new WMI event for 6
GHz regulatory

I suppose performance of 5GHz can be aligned with 6GHz, even they are worse
than custom datapath in Android. Is this the right expectation?

Thanks!
Jun

Re: Performance of WCN7850

[Jeff Johnson]

On 2/28/2024 12:52 AM, Jun Nie wrote:
> I suppose performance of 5GHz can be aligned with 6GHz, even they are worse
> than custom datapath in Android. Is this the right expectation?

That is my expectation. I've made the development team aware of the
discrepancy you are seeing.

/jeff

Re: Performance of WCN7850

[Jeff Johnson]

On 2/28/2024 9:39 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 2/28/2024 12:52 AM, Jun Nie wrote:
>> I suppose performance of 5GHz can be aligned with 6GHz, even they are worse
>> than custom datapath in Android. Is this the right expectation?
> 
> That is my expectation. I've made the development team aware of the
> discrepancy you are seeing.

Note that in theory you should be able to achieve higher throughput in 6
GHz due to the availability of 320 MHz bandwidth. But when using the
same bandwidth, the performance should be similar.

Re: Performance of WCN7850

[Jeff Johnson]

On 2/27/2024 5:54 AM, Jun Nie wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am trying to maximize the bandwidth of WCN7850. Does anyone know the
> performance status of WCN7850 in mainline? It's about 160Mbps in 6GHz
> band and ~600Mbps in 5GHz band on sm8650 platform in my test. The
> firmware is from below links:
> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0/board.bin
> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0/regdb.bin
> 
> While it is ~940Mbps in both 5GHz and 6GHz band with
> Android/linux6.1.25, . But the firmware names are different per log,
> amss20.bin on Android. Not sure whether the driver is totally
> different for Android/linux6.1.25 and mainline.
> 
> Do you have any idea that the low performance on mainline is due to
> driver difference or TX/RX power configuration, or firmware version?

To debug this issue the development team has asked:
#1) Please change ath12k debug_mask to 0xffffffff
#2) trigger association to 5G AP
#3) reproduce throughput low issue with 5G AP
#4) trigger association to 6G AP
#5) reproduce throughput low issue with 6G AP

Then share the logs with me (redacting anything personal) and I'll pass
them on to the developers.

Thanks
/jeff

6GHz AP association failure on WCN7850

[Jun Nie]

Hi,

I see there is association failure many times when I try to connect my
6GHz AP with latest mainline Linux. Does anyone also observe it too?
Any newer firmware than WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734 is available? Or we
recommend any specific version firmware?

The issue only happens with this version firmware:
  [    9.441624] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Hardware name: wcn7850 hw2.0
   [   10.058822] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4
board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200
   [   10.082876] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x200a06c6
fw_build_timestamp 2023-09-20 03:43 fw_build_id
QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1

I do not see the issue with firmware:
[    7.896737] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x1005bc12
fw_build_timestamp 2022-10-11 12:13 fw_build_id
QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4

Detail log can be found at:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jgn1zbnw44i1vypbjxl0v/ath12k-6GHz-association-fail-log.tgz?rlkey=pg2ifnzcttzimz7vaxb7tuc6w&dl=0

Jun

Re: 6GHz AP association failure on WCN7850

[Kang Yang]

On 3/1/2024 5:14 PM, Jun Nie wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I see there is association failure many times when I try to connect my
> 6GHz AP with latest mainline Linux. Does anyone also observe it too?
> Any newer firmware than WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734 is available? Or we
> recommend any specific version firmware?
> 
> The issue only happens with this version firmware:
>    [    9.441624] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Hardware name: wcn7850 hw2.0
>     [   10.058822] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4
> board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200
>     [   10.082876] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x200a06c6
> fw_build_timestamp 2023-09-20 03:43 fw_build_id
> QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1
> 

Wrong firmware.

We use WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3 and 
WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4,

https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/tree/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0

> I do not see the issue with firmware:
> [    7.896737] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x1005bc12
> fw_build_timestamp 2022-10-11 12:13 fw_build_id
> QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4
> 

That's it, i recommend you to use 
WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3. It's new one.



> Detail log can be found at:
> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jgn1zbnw44i1vypbjxl0v/ath12k-6GHz-association-fail-log.tgz?rlkey=pg2ifnzcttzimz7vaxb7tuc6w&dl=0
> 
> Jun

Re: 6GHz AP association failure on WCN7850

[Jun Nie]

Kang Yang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com> 于2024年3月1日周五 19:42写道：
>
>
>
> On 3/1/2024 5:14 PM, Jun Nie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see there is association failure many times when I try to connect my
> > 6GHz AP with latest mainline Linux. Does anyone also observe it too?
> > Any newer firmware than WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734 is available? Or we
> > recommend any specific version firmware?
> >
> > The issue only happens with this version firmware:
> >    [    9.441624] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Hardware name: wcn7850 hw2.0
> >     [   10.058822] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4
> > board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200
> >     [   10.082876] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x200a06c6
> > fw_build_timestamp 2023-09-20 03:43 fw_build_id
> > QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1
> >
>
> Wrong firmware.
>
> We use WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3 and
> WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4,
>
> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/tree/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0
>
> > I do not see the issue with firmware:
> > [    7.896737] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x1005bc12
> > fw_build_timestamp 2022-10-11 12:13 fw_build_id
> > QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4
> >
>
> That's it, i recommend you to use
> WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3. It's new one.
>
>
>
> > Detail log can be found at:
> > https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jgn1zbnw44i1vypbjxl0v/ath12k-6GHz-association-fail-log.tgz?rlkey=pg2ifnzcttzimz7vaxb7tuc6w&dl=0
> >
> > Jun

Hi Kang,

I see wlan0 failure with below log with firmware version
WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4.
Do I need any patch outside mainline? Actually, I add below 2 patches
for 6GHz band.
afb7a22d9e22 wifi: ath12k: build 6 GHz regd based on vdev type and 6
GHz power type
6c60469f0bae wifi: ath12k: add support to select 6 GHz Regulatory type


[    6.194535] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: setting mhi state: INIT(0)
[    6.195067] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: setting mhi state: POWER_ON(2)
[    6.195069] mhi mhi0: Requested to power ON
[    6.195083] mhi mhi0: Power on setup success
[    6.196541] mhi mhi0: Image transfer failed
[    6.196559] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_CODE value: 0xef128100
[    6.196574] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG1 value: 0xff7fc000
[    6.196588] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG2 value: 0x0
[    6.196601] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG3 value: 0x1988
[    6.196631] mhi mhi0: MHI did not load image over BHI, ret: -5

Kalle,
Thanks for the reminder of attachment size limitation!

Jun

Re: 6GHz AP association failure on WCN7850

[Kang Yang]

On 3/4/2024 6:14 PM, Jun Nie wrote:
> Kang Yang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com> 于2024年3月1日周五 19:42写道：
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/1/2024 5:14 PM, Jun Nie wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I see there is association failure many times when I try to connect my
>>> 6GHz AP with latest mainline Linux. Does anyone also observe it too?
>>> Any newer firmware than WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734 is available? Or we
>>> recommend any specific version firmware?
>>>
>>> The issue only happens with this version firmware:
>>>     [    9.441624] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Hardware name: wcn7850 hw2.0
>>>      [   10.058822] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4
>>> board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200
>>>      [   10.082876] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x200a06c6
>>> fw_build_timestamp 2023-09-20 03:43 fw_build_id
>>> QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1
>>>
>>
>> Wrong firmware.
>>
>> We use WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3 and
>> WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4,
>>
>> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/tree/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0
>>
>>> I do not see the issue with firmware:
>>> [    7.896737] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x1005bc12
>>> fw_build_timestamp 2022-10-11 12:13 fw_build_id
>>> QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4
>>>
>>
>> That's it, i recommend you to use
>> WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3. It's new one.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Detail log can be found at:
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jgn1zbnw44i1vypbjxl0v/ath12k-6GHz-association-fail-log.tgz?rlkey=pg2ifnzcttzimz7vaxb7tuc6w&dl=0
>>>
>>> Jun
> 
> Hi Kang,
> 
> I see wlan0 failure with below log with firmware version
> WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4.


Can you check if you completely replaces our upstream version?

It is best not to mix it with other versions
(board.bin/board.bin/regdb.bin/amss.bin/m3.bin).

Mixed use may also have an impact on throughput.





> Do I need any patch outside mainline? Actually, I add below 2 patches
> for 6GHz band.
> afb7a22d9e22 wifi: ath12k: build 6 GHz regd based on vdev type and 6
> GHz power type
> 6c60469f0bae wifi: ath12k: add support to select 6 GHz Regulatory type
> 


If problem still exist, please revert these patches and check again.




> 
> [    6.194535] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: setting mhi state: INIT(0)
> [    6.195067] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: setting mhi state: POWER_ON(2)
> [    6.195069] mhi mhi0: Requested to power ON
> [    6.195083] mhi mhi0: Power on setup success
> [    6.196541] mhi mhi0: Image transfer failed
> [    6.196559] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_CODE value: 0xef128100
> [    6.196574] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG1 value: 0xff7fc000
> [    6.196588] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG2 value: 0x0
> [    6.196601] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG3 value: 0x1988
> [    6.196631] mhi mhi0: MHI did not load image over BHI, ret: -5
> 

BTW, is it a probability problem?

> Kalle,
> Thanks for the reminder of attachment size limitation!
> 
> Jun

Re: 6GHz AP association failure on WCN7850

[Jun Nie]

Kang Yang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com> 于2024年3月5日周二 16:30写道：
>
>
>
> On 3/4/2024 6:14 PM, Jun Nie wrote:
> > Kang Yang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com> 于2024年3月1日周五 19:42写道：
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/1/2024 5:14 PM, Jun Nie wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I see there is association failure many times when I try to connect my
> >>> 6GHz AP with latest mainline Linux. Does anyone also observe it too?
> >>> Any newer firmware than WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734 is available? Or we
> >>> recommend any specific version firmware?
> >>>
> >>> The issue only happens with this version firmware:
> >>>     [    9.441624] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Hardware name: wcn7850 hw2.0
> >>>      [   10.058822] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4
> >>> board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200
> >>>      [   10.082876] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x200a06c6
> >>> fw_build_timestamp 2023-09-20 03:43 fw_build_id
> >>> QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1
> >>>
> >>
> >> Wrong firmware.
> >>
> >> We use WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3 and
> >> WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4,
> >>
> >> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/tree/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0
> >>
> >>> I do not see the issue with firmware:
> >>> [    7.896737] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x1005bc12
> >>> fw_build_timestamp 2022-10-11 12:13 fw_build_id
> >>> QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4
> >>>
> >>
> >> That's it, i recommend you to use
> >> WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3. It's new one.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Detail log can be found at:
> >>> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jgn1zbnw44i1vypbjxl0v/ath12k-6GHz-association-fail-log.tgz?rlkey=pg2ifnzcttzimz7vaxb7tuc6w&dl=0
> >>>
> >>> Jun
> >
> > Hi Kang,
> >
> > I see wlan0 failure with below log with firmware version
> > WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4.
>
>
> Can you check if you completely replaces our upstream version?
>
> It is best not to mix it with other versions
> (board.bin/board.bin/regdb.bin/amss.bin/m3.bin).
>
> Mixed use may also have an impact on throughput.
>
Yeah, tried to replace all binaries from below path, but no help.
https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/tree/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0
https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/tree/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0/WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3

What's your test platform? I use sm8650-hdk. Not sure whether there is something
platform dependent.
These binary was tested OK with Linux mainline on some QCOM platform, right?

>
>
>
>
> > Do I need any patch outside mainline? Actually, I add below 2 patches
> > for 6GHz band.
> > afb7a22d9e22 wifi: ath12k: build 6 GHz regd based on vdev type and 6
> > GHz power type
> > 6c60469f0bae wifi: ath12k: add support to select 6 GHz Regulatory type
> >
>
>
> If problem still exist, please revert these patches and check again.

Reverting them does not help as expected.
>
>
>
>
> >
> > [    6.194535] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: setting mhi state: INIT(0)
> > [    6.195067] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: setting mhi state: POWER_ON(2)
> > [    6.195069] mhi mhi0: Requested to power ON
> > [    6.195083] mhi mhi0: Power on setup success
> > [    6.196541] mhi mhi0: Image transfer failed
> > [    6.196559] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_CODE value: 0xef128100
> > [    6.196574] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG1 value: 0xff7fc000
> > [    6.196588] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG2 value: 0x0
> > [    6.196601] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG3 value: 0x1988
> > [    6.196631] mhi mhi0: MHI did not load image over BHI, ret: -5
> >
>
> BTW, is it a probability problem?

It happens 100%.
>
> > Kalle,
> > Thanks for the reminder of attachment size limitation!
> >
> > Jun

Re: 6GHz AP association failure on WCN7850

[Kang Yang]

On 3/6/2024 10:25 AM, Jun Nie wrote:
> Kang Yang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com> 于2024年3月5日周二 16:30写道：
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/4/2024 6:14 PM, Jun Nie wrote:
>>> Kang Yang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com> 于2024年3月1日周五 19:42写道：
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/1/2024 5:14 PM, Jun Nie wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I see there is association failure many times when I try to connect my
>>>>> 6GHz AP with latest mainline Linux. Does anyone also observe it too?
>>>>> Any newer firmware than WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734 is available? Or we
>>>>> recommend any specific version firmware?
>>>>>
>>>>> The issue only happens with this version firmware:
>>>>>      [    9.441624] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Hardware name: wcn7850 hw2.0
>>>>>       [   10.058822] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4
>>>>> board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200
>>>>>       [   10.082876] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x200a06c6
>>>>> fw_build_timestamp 2023-09-20 03:43 fw_build_id
>>>>> QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wrong firmware.
>>>>
>>>> We use WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3 and
>>>> WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4,
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/tree/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0
>>>>
>>>>> I do not see the issue with firmware:
>>>>> [    7.896737] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x1005bc12
>>>>> fw_build_timestamp 2022-10-11 12:13 fw_build_id
>>>>> QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's it, i recommend you to use
>>>> WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3. It's new one.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Detail log can be found at:
>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jgn1zbnw44i1vypbjxl0v/ath12k-6GHz-association-fail-log.tgz?rlkey=pg2ifnzcttzimz7vaxb7tuc6w&dl=0
>>>>>
>>>>> Jun
>>>
>>> Hi Kang,
>>>
>>> I see wlan0 failure with below log with firmware version
>>> WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4.
>>
>>
>> Can you check if you completely replaces our upstream version?
>>
>> It is best not to mix it with other versions
>> (board.bin/board.bin/regdb.bin/amss.bin/m3.bin).
>>
>> Mixed use may also have an impact on throughput.
>>
> Yeah, tried to replace all binaries from below path, but no help.
> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/tree/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0
> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/tree/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0/WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3
> 

So, both WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4. and 
WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3 have this problem? 
Their log is the same?




> What's your test platform? I use sm8650-hdk. Not sure whether there is something
> platform dependent.

Our test platform is x86 devices(normal x86 PC or x86 board).

These binary can only be uploaded after detailed testing on x86 platform.


> These binary was tested OK with Linux mainline on some QCOM platform, right?
> 




Your platform is arm. Actually, we never test whether upstream firmware 
of ath12k can work well on other platforms. Any errors could happen.



Did you download this firmware by git clone? Or just download manually.

Please retry with git clone if you download manually.







>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Do I need any patch outside mainline? Actually, I add below 2 patches
>>> for 6GHz band.
>>> afb7a22d9e22 wifi: ath12k: build 6 GHz regd based on vdev type and 6
>>> GHz power type
>>> 6c60469f0bae wifi: ath12k: add support to select 6 GHz Regulatory type
>>>
>>
>>
>> If problem still exist, please revert these patches and check again.
> 
> Reverting them does not help as expected.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> [    6.194535] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: setting mhi state: INIT(0)
>>> [    6.195067] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: setting mhi state: POWER_ON(2)
>>> [    6.195069] mhi mhi0: Requested to power ON
>>> [    6.195083] mhi mhi0: Power on setup success
>>> [    6.196541] mhi mhi0: Image transfer failed
>>> [    6.196559] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_CODE value: 0xef128100
>>> [    6.196574] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG1 value: 0xff7fc000
>>> [    6.196588] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG2 value: 0x0
>>> [    6.196601] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG3 value: 0x1988
>>> [    6.196631] mhi mhi0: MHI did not load image over BHI, ret: -5
>>>
>>
>> BTW, is it a probability problem?
> 
> It happens 100%.
>>
>>> Kalle,
>>> Thanks for the reminder of attachment size limitation!
>>>
>>> Jun

Re: 6GHz AP association failure on WCN7850

[Jun Nie]

Kang Yang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com> 于2024年3月6日周三 14:45写道：
>
>
>
> On 3/6/2024 10:25 AM, Jun Nie wrote:
> > Kang Yang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com> 于2024年3月5日周二 16:30写道：
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/4/2024 6:14 PM, Jun Nie wrote:
> >>> Kang Yang <quic_kangyang@quicinc.com> 于2024年3月1日周五 19:42写道：
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 3/1/2024 5:14 PM, Jun Nie wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I see there is association failure many times when I try to connect my
> >>>>> 6GHz AP with latest mainline Linux. Does anyone also observe it too?
> >>>>> Any newer firmware than WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734 is available? Or we
> >>>>> recommend any specific version firmware?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The issue only happens with this version firmware:
> >>>>>      [    9.441624] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Hardware name: wcn7850 hw2.0
> >>>>>       [   10.058822] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4
> >>>>> board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200
> >>>>>       [   10.082876] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x200a06c6
> >>>>> fw_build_timestamp 2023-09-20 03:43 fw_build_id
> >>>>> QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Wrong firmware.
> >>>>
> >>>> We use WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3 and
> >>>> WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4,
> >>>>
> >>>> https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/tree/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0
> >>>>
> >>>>> I do not see the issue with firmware:
> >>>>> [    7.896737] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x1005bc12
> >>>>> fw_build_timestamp 2022-10-11 12:13 fw_build_id
> >>>>> QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> That's it, i recommend you to use
> >>>> WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3. It's new one.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Detail log can be found at:
> >>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jgn1zbnw44i1vypbjxl0v/ath12k-6GHz-association-fail-log.tgz?rlkey=pg2ifnzcttzimz7vaxb7tuc6w&dl=0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jun
> >>>
> >>> Hi Kang,
> >>>
> >>> I see wlan0 failure with below log with firmware version
> >>> WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4.
> >>
> >>
> >> Can you check if you completely replaces our upstream version?
> >>
> >> It is best not to mix it with other versions
> >> (board.bin/board.bin/regdb.bin/amss.bin/m3.bin).
> >>
> >> Mixed use may also have an impact on throughput.
> >>
> > Yeah, tried to replace all binaries from below path, but no help.
> > https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/tree/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0
> > https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/tree/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0/WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3
> >
>
> So, both WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4. and
> WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3 have this problem?
> Their log is the same?
>
>
>
>
> > What's your test platform? I use sm8650-hdk. Not sure whether there is something
> > platform dependent.
>
> Our test platform is x86 devices(normal x86 PC or x86 board).
>
> These binary can only be uploaded after detailed testing on x86 platform.
>
>
> > These binary was tested OK with Linux mainline on some QCOM platform, right?
> >
>
>
>
>
> Your platform is arm. Actually, we never test whether upstream firmware
> of ath12k can work well on other platforms. Any errors could happen.
>
>
>
> Did you download this firmware by git clone? Or just download manually.
>
> Please retry with git clone if you download manually.
>
>
>
You are right. It is downloading issue. binaries from git clone works well.
But 5GHz performance of version WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481 is worse than
the 600Mbps on version WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427. The 6GHz performance
is similar, ~160Mbps. Do you what's the improvement of new firmware?

[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  2.62 MBytes  22.0 Mbits/sec    0    144 KBytes
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  4.75 MBytes  39.8 Mbits/sec    0    335 KBytes
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  7.62 MBytes  64.1 Mbits/sec    0    622 KBytes
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  14.4 MBytes   121 Mbits/sec    0   1.15 MBytes
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  53.1 MBytes   446 Mbits/sec    0   2.35 MBytes
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  42.2 MBytes   354 Mbits/sec    0   2.91 MBytes
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  58.9 MBytes   494 Mbits/sec    0   2.91 MBytes
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  60.8 MBytes   510 Mbits/sec    0   2.91 MBytes
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  55.6 MBytes   466 Mbits/sec    0   2.91 MBytes
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  57.4 MBytes   480 Mbits/sec    0   2.91 MBytes

Thanks for your info!
- Jun
>
>
>
>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Do I need any patch outside mainline? Actually, I add below 2 patches
> >>> for 6GHz band.
> >>> afb7a22d9e22 wifi: ath12k: build 6 GHz regd based on vdev type and 6
> >>> GHz power type
> >>> 6c60469f0bae wifi: ath12k: add support to select 6 GHz Regulatory type
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> If problem still exist, please revert these patches and check again.
> >
> > Reverting them does not help as expected.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> [    6.194535] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: setting mhi state: INIT(0)
> >>> [    6.195067] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: setting mhi state: POWER_ON(2)
> >>> [    6.195069] mhi mhi0: Requested to power ON
> >>> [    6.195083] mhi mhi0: Power on setup success
> >>> [    6.196541] mhi mhi0: Image transfer failed
> >>> [    6.196559] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_CODE value: 0xef128100
> >>> [    6.196574] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG1 value: 0xff7fc000
> >>> [    6.196588] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG2 value: 0x0
> >>> [    6.196601] mhi mhi0: Reg: ERROR_DBG3 value: 0x1988
> >>> [    6.196631] mhi mhi0: MHI did not load image over BHI, ret: -5
> >>>
> >>
> >> BTW, is it a probability problem?
> >
> > It happens 100%.
> >>
> >>> Kalle,
> >>> Thanks for the reminder of attachment size limitation!
> >>>
> >>> Jun

Re: 6GHz AP association failure on WCN7850

[Kalle Valo]

Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> writes:

> I see there is association failure many times when I try to connect my
> 6GHz AP with latest mainline Linux. Does anyone also observe it too?
> Any newer firmware than WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734 is available? Or we
> recommend any specific version firmware?
>
> The issue only happens with this version firmware:
>   [    9.441624] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Hardware name: wcn7850 hw2.0
>    [   10.058822] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x2 chip_family 0x4
> board_id 0x3d soc_id 0x40170200
>    [   10.082876] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x200a06c6
> fw_build_timestamp 2023-09-20 03:43 fw_build_id
> QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.2.0-01734-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1
>
> I do not see the issue with firmware:
> [    7.896737] ath12k_pci 0000:01:00.0: fw_version 0x1005bc12
> fw_build_timestamp 2022-10-11 12:13 fw_build_id
> QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HMT.1.0-03427-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.15378.4
>
> Detail log can be found at:
> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jgn1zbnw44i1vypbjxl0v/ath12k-6GHz-association-fail-log.tgz?rlkey=pg2ifnzcttzimz7vaxb7tuc6w&dl=0

    List:    ath12k@lists.infradead.org
    From:    jun.nie@linaro.org
    Subject: Re: Performance of WCN7850
    Reason:  Message body is too big: 1294317 bytes with a limit of 500 KB

BTW Jun, please don't submit 1 MB files to our lists. That's just too
much. IMHO 100 kB should be the maximum even if the list has 500 kB
limit.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Re: Performance of WCN7850

[Jun Nie]

Jun Nie <jun.nie@linaro.org> 于2024年3月1日周五 16:15写道：
>
> Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> 于2024年2月29日周四 23:53写道：
> >
> > On 2/27/2024 5:54 AM, Jun Nie wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to maximize the bandwidth of WCN7850. Does anyone know the
> > > performance status of WCN7850 in mainline? It's about 160Mbps in 6GHz
> > > band and ~600Mbps in 5GHz band on sm8650 platform in my test. The
> > > firmware is from below links:
> > > https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0/board.bin
> > > https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/ath12k-testing/WCN7850/hw2.0/regdb.bin
> > >
> > > While it is ~940Mbps in both 5GHz and 6GHz band with
> > > Android/linux6.1.25, . But the firmware names are different per log,
> > > amss20.bin on Android. Not sure whether the driver is totally
> > > different for Android/linux6.1.25 and mainline.
> > >
> > > Do you have any idea that the low performance on mainline is due to
> > > driver difference or TX/RX power configuration, or firmware version?
> >
> > To debug this issue the development team has asked:
> > #1) Please change ath12k debug_mask to 0xffffffff
> > #2) trigger association to 5G AP
> > #3) reproduce throughput low issue with 5G AP
> > #4) trigger association to 6G AP
> > #5) reproduce throughput low issue with 6G AP
> >
> > Then share the logs with me (redacting anything personal) and I'll pass
> > them on to the developers.
> >
> > Thanks
> > /jeff
> >
Hi Jeff,
The latest finding is that 6GHz TX performance of wcn7850 is as we talked about.
But the RX performance wcn7850 is better than 5GHz case. So the direction
impacts a lot. Not sure whether the bottoleneck is in scheduling side, or any
configuration on TX power.

> Jun

Re: Performance of WCN7850

[Jeff Johnson]

On 3/11/2024 2:19 AM, Jun Nie wrote:
> The latest finding is that 6GHz TX performance of wcn7850 is as we talked about.
> But the RX performance wcn7850 is better than 5GHz case. So the direction
> impacts a lot. Not sure whether the bottoleneck is in scheduling side, or any
> configuration on TX power.

There is at least one 6 GHz patch in the pipeline that should be posted this week.

/jeff

Re: Performance of WCN7850

[Jun Nie]

Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> 于2024年3月12日周二 01:23写道：
>
> On 3/11/2024 2:19 AM, Jun Nie wrote:
> > The latest finding is that 6GHz TX performance of wcn7850 is as we talked about.
> > But the RX performance wcn7850 is better than 5GHz case. So the direction
> > impacts a lot. Not sure whether the bottoleneck is in scheduling side, or any
> > configuration on TX power.
>
> There is at least one 6 GHz patch in the pipeline that should be posted this week.
>
> /jeff
>
Hi Jeff,
What's the performance data with the patch in the pipeline? Is it
possible to have a
early test with my hardware?

Jun