From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 20:27:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC120A3.3020307@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9532BE30-26F1-42CF-9300-C25585B29300@gmail.com>
On 2012-05-26 7:15 PM, Joe Semler wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
>
> Am 26.05.2012 um 14:35 schrieb Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>:
>
>>>
>>>
>>> OK, tnx Sujith, but that brings me to my next question acc. 2x2 or 3x3
>>> on OpenWRT-based devices like NanoStation M or AirBridge M.
>>> Up to now only 1x2 or 1x3 was possible on this devices. Do we have
>>> changings there too?
>> Why do you think that only 1x2 or 1x3 was possible on these devices? 2x2
>> and 3x3 has been working just fine for a long time now, and it's enabled
>> by default where supported by the hardware
> Pickend this Info from The List that devices with openwrt are just
> transmitting at 1 stream but rec. at both. How can I change the
> settings? Also with uci or only with the iw-commands?
You don't need to change anything, just use the defaults.
I have no idea what post from the list you're referring to, but here's a
piece of advice: It's not unheard of that sometimes people put wrong
things on the internet :)
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-26 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-26 3:17 [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests? Ben Greear
2012-05-26 3:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 5:48 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 7:43 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 7:55 ` Josef Semler
2012-05-26 11:28 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 12:35 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 17:15 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 17:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-29 10:24 ` Josef Semler
2012-05-29 10:58 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 18:27 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2012-05-26 15:37 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26 16:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:39 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 15:08 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 16:48 ` Peter Stuge
2012-05-27 17:38 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 17:40 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 18:14 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 23:15 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 23:29 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-28 3:55 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-28 6:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28 7:15 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-28 20:07 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 19:24 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 22:31 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 18:23 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 19:07 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 19:19 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 0:06 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 3:22 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-30 3:47 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-31 2:29 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 17:58 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 8:14 ` Zefir Kurtisi
2012-05-29 10:09 ` Peter Stuge
2012-05-26 17:56 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 2:05 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:09 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:16 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 2:23 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 11:30 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 12:32 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:31 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-06-15 21:08 ` Stephen Donecker
2012-06-16 21:03 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-06-20 2:20 ` Stephen Donecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC120A3.3020307@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox