From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 20:14:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC26EED.5090906@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmon13Q5icGU0oeQWaOaHF+jfhEZHyK2Y1xp5BwCgM_74pg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2012-05-27 7:40 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 27 May 2012 08:08, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>
>> Do you have a link to anyone selling this AP, or is it just an
>> engineering sample as well?
>
> The board is an engineering sample but (a) customers and developers
> can ask for them under NDA, (b) yes, openwrt developers have done this
> and have the hardware, and (c) the chip is shipping as far as I'm
> aware.
>
> It's "just" a MIPS74k + AR9340 (3x3) + on-board AR9580 I think. I'll
> have to double check. The wireless NIC side of things is pretty
> standard though, so any Osprey NIC will be fine.
>
>> I can't even find marketing type pages for AR9340, search results come up
>> empty at www.atheros.com :P
>>> [ 3] 33.0-34.0 sec 39.0 MBytes 327 Mbits/sec 0.253 ms 13/ 5002
>>> (0.26%)
>
>> Those are nice results! I'll try WPEA-127N as AP and STA and see what I
>> get.
>
> That's what you should be getting. I'd be really surprised if you didn't. :-)
>
> nbd has said he'll look into it, so between Sujith and Felix I think
> we're well covered for now.
>
> Thanks for bringing this to everyone's attention Ben!
I already committed some performance fixes in OpenWrt that bring UDP
performance over a WDS link between an AR9344+AR9380 (Atheros DB120) and
an AR7242+AR9380 (TP-Link TL-WR2543ND) up to about 310-320 Mbit/s, when
doing Tx on the DB120 side. Reverse direction is slower, because AR7242
isn't as powerful as the AR9344.
These fixes do not touch ath9k, I only tweaked the network stack to
avoid redundant copying/reallocation of skb data.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-27 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-26 3:17 [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests? Ben Greear
2012-05-26 3:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 5:48 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 7:43 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 7:55 ` Josef Semler
2012-05-26 11:28 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 12:35 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 17:15 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 17:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-29 10:24 ` Josef Semler
2012-05-29 10:58 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 18:27 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 15:37 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26 16:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:39 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 15:08 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 16:48 ` Peter Stuge
2012-05-27 17:38 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 17:40 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 18:14 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2012-05-27 23:15 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 23:29 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-28 3:55 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-28 6:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28 7:15 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-28 20:07 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 19:24 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 22:31 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 18:23 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 19:07 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 19:19 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 0:06 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 3:22 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-30 3:47 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-31 2:29 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 17:58 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 8:14 ` Zefir Kurtisi
2012-05-29 10:09 ` Peter Stuge
2012-05-26 17:56 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 2:05 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:09 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:16 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 2:23 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 11:30 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 12:32 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:31 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-06-15 21:08 ` Stephen Donecker
2012-06-16 21:03 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-06-20 2:20 ` Stephen Donecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC26EED.5090906@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox