Historical ath9k-devel archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Question about antenna throughput.
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:19:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50044D0E.1060800@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomJA182S7A-ak7e5Uh8sw8LcSUxjRsUx71WMexhNZQ8gg@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/15/2012 02:39 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 12 July 2012 07:11, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>> We have a 3x3 NIC (wpea-127n).  A user reports that when using
>> a single antenna cable to directly connect to an AP (with attenuator),
>> that one of the antenna can do about 30Mbps download from AP, the
>> other about 25Mbps, and the third cable can only do about 1Mbps.
>>
>> Is that expected results?
>
> If I recall what's going on, the actual signal sent out the antennas
> isn't necessarily a mirrored copy from each antenna, even for 1 stream
> and legacy signals. Definitely for 2 and 3 stream signals that is
> absolutely to be expected.
>
> The baseband may decide to "scramble" it so part of the wireless
> transmission goes out each antenna. Don't ask me about the details, I
> don't know them.
>
> There's also STBC for 1 stream 11n rates.
>
> If you want to connect a single cable to an AP, you have to put it
> into a single chain TX/RX mode and use the correct chain. On that NIC
> you can configure it to be a single chain on any of chain 0, 1 or 2.
> (It doesn't have to be 0.) But you have to choose a single chain.
>
> So, yes. I think that's totally understandable behaviour.

Ok, I'm going to look into this chain configuration.

This user is also reporting that our box can only communicate
down to about -72dBm, whereas some off-the-shelf USB dongles
are providing around 100kbps at -78 to -80dBm.

Are there any published rate v/s range results for ath9k available?

Perhaps the chaining issue is also involved in this?

Thanks for the detailed answers on this....this is new
territory for me!

Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-16 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-12 14:11 [ath9k-devel] Question about antenna throughput Ben Greear
2012-07-15  9:39 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-07-16 17:19   ` Ben Greear [this message]
2012-07-16 17:28     ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-07-16 17:31       ` Ben Greear
2012-07-18 16:44     ` Adrian Chadd
2012-07-18 17:00       ` Ben Greear
2012-07-24 15:47       ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50044D0E.1060800@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox