Historical ath9k-devel archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Question about antenna throughput.
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:00:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5006EBA1.50003@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokqYoNdNWZRih3b2WUjDmNf+8VsMNgxC0FkkoDYrdWYFA@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/18/2012 09:44 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 16 July 2012 10:19, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I'm going to look into this chain configuration.
>>
>> This user is also reporting that our box can only communicate
>> down to about -72dBm, whereas some off-the-shelf USB dongles
>> are providing around 100kbps at -78 to -80dBm.
>>
>> Are there any published rate v/s range results for ath9k available?
>
> That's odd. You should be able to receive low rates at a much lower
> signal than that.
>
> I'll work with Sujith and see if we can pull up the expected
> sensitivity tables for each rate. Maybe the RX gain tables are all
> wrong, or the NICs you're using have poor(ish) RX EVM?

No idea.  It could be mis-configuration at any level..but if there
are published results, we can run similar tests and then pay attention
if we see any significant differences.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-18 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-12 14:11 [ath9k-devel] Question about antenna throughput Ben Greear
2012-07-15  9:39 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-07-16 17:19   ` Ben Greear
2012-07-16 17:28     ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-07-16 17:31       ` Ben Greear
2012-07-18 16:44     ` Adrian Chadd
2012-07-18 17:00       ` Ben Greear [this message]
2012-07-24 15:47       ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5006EBA1.50003@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox