Historical ath9k-devel archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ath9k-devel] RadioTap Headers in Managed Mode
@ 2014-06-14  7:40 mahaveer gupta
  2014-06-14 19:36 ` Holger Schurig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: mahaveer gupta @ 2014-06-14  7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

Hello,

RadioTap headers are produced only in monitor mode.

Wondering how hard it would be to tweak the driver is to get these headers
in a normal managed mode too.

Any pointers will be helpful, if such a feature is available

-- 
Thanks,
M
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20140614/1ffbb15a/attachment.htm 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [ath9k-devel] RadioTap Headers in Managed Mode
  2014-06-14  7:40 [ath9k-devel] RadioTap Headers in Managed Mode mahaveer gupta
@ 2014-06-14 19:36 ` Holger Schurig
  2014-06-15  3:29   ` mahaveer gupta
  2014-06-16 21:35   ` [ath9k-devel] Delayed transmission configuration switching Ali Abedi
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Holger Schurig @ 2014-06-14 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

That would be pretty useless. No user-space application would know
about this (e.g. you couldn't use wpa_supplicant then), and the kernel
TCP/IP would also fail.

However, you can have one managed mode interface (e.g. "wlan0") and at
the same time a monitor interface ("mon0"). In that case you get
everything on mon0 what happens on wlan0. wpa_supplicant continues to
work, and TCP/IP isn't borked either.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [ath9k-devel] RadioTap Headers in Managed Mode
  2014-06-14 19:36 ` Holger Schurig
@ 2014-06-15  3:29   ` mahaveer gupta
  2014-06-16 21:35   ` [ath9k-devel] Delayed transmission configuration switching Ali Abedi
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: mahaveer gupta @ 2014-06-15  3:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

Thanks for the suggestion, the user-space programs won't understand the
format, but the plan was to use a click modular router and strip off the
radiotap fields after logging them (and replace with ethernet header before
passing to host)

However, having another monitor interface should work well, should give
what i need without changing the kernel.




On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@gmail.com>
wrote:

> That would be pretty useless. No user-space application would know
> about this (e.g. you couldn't use wpa_supplicant then), and the kernel
> TCP/IP would also fail.
>
> However, you can have one managed mode interface (e.g. "wlan0") and at
> the same time a monitor interface ("mon0"). In that case you get
> everything on mon0 what happens on wlan0. wpa_supplicant continues to
> work, and TCP/IP isn't borked either.
>



-- 
Thanks,
M
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20140614/658a2cea/attachment.htm 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [ath9k-devel] Delayed transmission configuration switching
  2014-06-14 19:36 ` Holger Schurig
  2014-06-15  3:29   ` mahaveer gupta
@ 2014-06-16 21:35   ` Ali Abedi
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ali Abedi @ 2014-06-16 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath9k-devel

Hello,

We use the Ath9k driver for our 802.11 research projects. We transmit 
every frame using a new transmission rate (MCS, short GI, HT20/40). We 
cycle through all different rates (96 rates in our 3x3:3 testbed).
We noticed that when we change the transmission configuration (i.e. from 
Short GI to Long GI, and from HT40 to HT20) the next packet is sent at 
the previous configuration.


MCS    S-GI    HT40
12        1            0
12        1            0
12        1            0
6          1            0  <--- supposed to be 6  0  0  (The sender 
claims that this frame was sent using L-GI)
6          0            0
6          0            0

It seems that the hardware did not have time to switch the 
configuration. Does anyone know if this is the actual reason and if 
there is any solution?

Thank you,
Ali

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-16 21:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-14  7:40 [ath9k-devel] RadioTap Headers in Managed Mode mahaveer gupta
2014-06-14 19:36 ` Holger Schurig
2014-06-15  3:29   ` mahaveer gupta
2014-06-16 21:35   ` [ath9k-devel] Delayed transmission configuration switching Ali Abedi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox