From: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: backports@vger.kernel.org,
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] backports: introduce new definition for DECLARE_EWMA macro
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:57:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1489064253-3652-4-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489064253-3652-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Since commit eb1e011a1474 ("average: change to declare precision,
not factor") the definition of DECLARE_EWMA has changed so we
need a backport for the new macro as it differs. Changing the
strategy by checking the kernel version and #undef the macro to
be sure we do not run into macro redefinition issue.
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
---
backport/backport-include/linux/average.h | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/backport/backport-include/linux/average.h b/backport/backport-include/linux/average.h
index 5d80041..51702fb 100644
--- a/backport/backport-include/linux/average.h
+++ b/backport/backport-include/linux/average.h
@@ -2,45 +2,68 @@
#define __BACKPORT_AVERAGE
#include_next <linux/average.h>
-#ifndef DECLARE_EWMA
-#define DECLARE_EWMA(name, _factor, _weight) \
+/*
+ * Exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA)
+ *
+ * This implements a fixed-precision EWMA algorithm, with both the
+ * precision and fall-off coefficient determined at compile-time
+ * and built into the generated helper funtions.
+ *
+ * The first argument to the macro is the name that will be used
+ * for the struct and helper functions.
+ *
+ * The second argument, the precision, expresses how many bits are
+ * used for the fractional part of the fixed-precision values.
+ *
+ * The third argument, the weight reciprocal, determines how the
+ * new values will be weighed vs. the old state, new values will
+ * get weight 1/weight_rcp and old values 1-1/weight_rcp. Note
+ * that this parameter must be a power of two for efficiency.
+ */
+#if LINUX_VERSION_IS_LESS(4, 11, 0)
+#undef DECLARE_EWMA
+#define DECLARE_EWMA(name, _precision, _weight_rcp) \
struct ewma_##name { \
unsigned long internal; \
}; \
static inline void ewma_##name##_init(struct ewma_##name *e) \
{ \
- BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_factor)); \
- BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_weight)); \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(_factor); \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(_weight); \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_precision)); \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_weight_rcp)); \
+ /* \
+ * Even if you want to feed it just 0/1 you should have \
+ * some bits for the non-fractional part... \
+ */ \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON((_precision) > 30); \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(_weight_rcp); \
e->internal = 0; \
} \
static inline unsigned long \
ewma_##name##_read(struct ewma_##name *e) \
{ \
- BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_factor)); \
- BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_weight)); \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(_factor); \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(_weight); \
- return e->internal >> ilog2(_factor); \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_precision)); \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_weight_rcp)); \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON((_precision) > 30); \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(_weight_rcp); \
+ return e->internal >> (_precision); \
} \
static inline void ewma_##name##_add(struct ewma_##name *e, \
unsigned long val) \
{ \
unsigned long internal = ACCESS_ONCE(e->internal); \
- unsigned long weight = ilog2(_weight); \
- unsigned long factor = ilog2(_factor); \
+ unsigned long weight_rcp = ilog2(_weight_rcp); \
+ unsigned long precision = _precision; \
\
- BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_factor)); \
- BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_weight)); \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(_factor); \
- BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(_weight); \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_precision)); \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(_weight_rcp)); \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON((_precision) > 30); \
+ BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(_weight_rcp); \
\
ACCESS_ONCE(e->internal) = internal ? \
- (((internal << weight) - internal) + \
- (val << factor)) >> weight : \
- (val << factor); \
+ (((internal << weight_rcp) - internal) + \
+ (val << precision)) >> weight_rcp : \
+ (val << precision); \
}
-#endif /* DECLARE_EWMA */
+#endif /* LINUX_VERSION_IS_LESS(4, 11, 0) */
#endif /* __BACKPORT_AVERAGE */
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-09 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-09 12:57 [PATCH 0/4] backports: fixes for wireless-testing Arend van Spriel
2017-03-09 12:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] patches: update crypto-ccm.patch for v4.11-rc1 Arend van Spriel
2017-03-10 6:34 ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-10 9:49 ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-03-10 9:52 ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-10 10:08 ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-03-10 10:09 ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-09 12:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] backports: add backport for idr_remove Arend van Spriel
2017-03-09 12:57 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2017-03-10 6:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] backports: introduce new definition for DECLARE_EWMA macro Johannes Berg
2017-03-10 9:53 ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-03-14 13:49 ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-09 12:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] backports: add dummy include/linux/sched/signal.h Arend van Spriel
2017-03-31 7:29 ` [PATCH 0/4] backports: fixes for wireless-testing Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1489064253-3652-4-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--to=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=backports@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox