From: GUSL <gfjl@ubbi.com>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
Subject: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Kernel 2.6 vs 2.4
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 23:33:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806042333.52669.gfjl@ubbi.com> (raw)
Hi all !
At the same hardware, are yields obtained different, with batmand-0.3
running on Linux kernel 2.6 vs. Linux kernel 2.4 ?
TIA.
next reply other threads:[~2008-06-05 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-05 2:33 GUSL [this message]
2008-06-05 3:02 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Kernel 2.6 vs 2.4 Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200806042333.52669.gfjl@ubbi.com \
--to=gfjl@ubbi.com \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox