From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Kernel 2.6 vs 2.4
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:02:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806051102.54951.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806042333.52669.gfjl@ubbi.com>
Hi,
> At the same hardware, are yields obtained different, with batmand-0.3
> running on Linux kernel 2.6 vs. Linux kernel 2.4 ?
If so it is not related to batman. Linux 2.6 comes with considerably
improvements regarding wifi driver support and performance. It is likely that
you will "feel" better results because of that.
Greetings,
Marek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-05 3:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-05 2:33 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Kernel 2.6 vs 2.4 GUSL
2008-06-05 3:02 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200806051102.54951.lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--to=lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox