From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Cc: David Beaumont <djb31st@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Nat Question
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:50:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008121150.33820.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim8cNH29kS=VM+m18OeexHaxwo19ug6Yu04Q6wx@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 811 bytes --]
David Beaumont wrote:
> The bat0 interface is currently bridged as follows
>
> On the router with internet going into the WAN port (ETH1), BAT0 is
> bridged with the LAN (ETH0) Internet works correctly though the lan,
> so i would assume NAT routing to the WAN is setup correctly?
so you have eth0 and bat0(ath0) in a bridge br0 -> eth1 uses nat to translate
packets for/from eth1?
> On the router on the other end of the mesh, BAT0 is bridged with the
> WAN port (ETH1) so that the router will route WAN traffic though BAT0?
What? Why a different internet gateway and why do you bridge the bat0(ath0)
interface with the wan interface instead of using nat here?
Maybe there is a misunderstanding somewhere... At least I am extremely
confused about your setup.
Best regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-12 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.375.1281525844.17951.b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
[not found] ` <AANLkTim-RfupM1iHH-dFwtDiN5RLFVaP=AWK9=MH-dGK@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-11 11:48 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Nat Question David Beaumont
[not found] ` <AANLkTinhcpamuMGApH9D5SPn3VNkEi9BDCYwGkRcDdJq@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-11 12:50 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 9:31 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-12 9:38 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 9:50 ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
2010-08-12 10:11 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 10:16 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 10:33 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-12 10:41 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 10:50 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-12 11:08 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 11:29 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-12 11:41 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 13:14 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 13:19 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-12 13:26 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 13:27 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-13 5:45 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-14 14:46 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-16 13:11 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-16 16:32 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-17 8:14 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-20 9:53 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-20 9:57 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-20 9:58 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-20 11:27 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-23 7:05 ` David Beaumont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201008121150.33820.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
--to=sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=djb31st@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox