From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Nat Question
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:50:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008121250.07216.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=nX3JGXjpZRT9O5qf=TKMqxLWB+mazWAeD4wsF@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday 12 August 2010 12:41:41 David Beaumont wrote:
> I originally had my MTU values set incorrectly, but believe i have
> them correct now
>
> router with internet
>
> ath0 - MTU 1524 (physical wifi device)
>
> router on otherside of mesh
>
> ath0 - MTU 1524 (physical wifi device)
Yes, that looks good.
The problems you describe sound like MTU or firewall issues which is why I was
asking.
> wifi0 - MTU 1500 (should this be 1524 also)
You should ignore the wifi0 interface and not include it in any configuration.
It is of no relevance in your setup.
> I am aware that it is quite an old verison, although this is the
> version that is currently in the openwrt repo. I will compile a more
> recent version once i have the basics working i think.
Ok.
> Thanks for you help so far guys, two people have suggested MTU issues
> now, so fingers crossed someone can see something wrong with the
> output above?
Could you post the config of both nodes ? That includes:
* ifconfig
* brctl show
* ip route / route -n
* cat /proc/net/batman-adv/interfaces
* iptables (-t nat) -vnL [on the internet-router]
Regards,
Marek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-12 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.375.1281525844.17951.b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
[not found] ` <AANLkTim-RfupM1iHH-dFwtDiN5RLFVaP=AWK9=MH-dGK@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-11 11:48 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Nat Question David Beaumont
[not found] ` <AANLkTinhcpamuMGApH9D5SPn3VNkEi9BDCYwGkRcDdJq@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-11 12:50 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 9:31 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-12 9:38 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 9:50 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-12 10:11 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 10:16 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 10:33 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-12 10:41 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 10:50 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2010-08-12 11:08 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 11:29 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-12 11:41 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 13:14 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 13:19 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-12 13:26 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-12 13:27 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-13 5:45 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-14 14:46 ` Marek Lindner
2010-08-16 13:11 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-16 16:32 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-17 8:14 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-20 9:53 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-20 9:57 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-20 9:58 ` David Beaumont
2010-08-20 11:27 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-08-23 7:05 ` David Beaumont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201008121250.07216.lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--to=lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox