* [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman as a kernel module
@ 2012-04-17 12:05 Mitar
2012-04-17 12:10 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-04-17 12:28 ` Antonio Quartulli
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mitar @ 2012-04-17 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
Hi!
What are the reasons (except for performance) of Batman being a kernel
module? Is there a way for running it in user-space? We have some
servers where we get donated bandwidth, but as people are running also
other stuff on those servers they do not really like adding kernel
modules and probably even rebooting servers for upgrading to newer
Batman versions.
Would some compatibility layer be possible to have to run Batman in
user-space? Are there any existing known?
Mitar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman as a kernel module
2012-04-17 12:05 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman as a kernel module Mitar
@ 2012-04-17 12:10 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-04-17 12:28 ` Antonio Quartulli
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sven Eckelmann @ 2012-04-17 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 191 bytes --]
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 02:05:40 PM Mitar wrote:
> Would some compatibility layer be possible to have to run Batman in
> user-space? Are there any existing known?
KVM
Kind regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman as a kernel module
2012-04-17 12:05 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman as a kernel module Mitar
2012-04-17 12:10 ` Sven Eckelmann
@ 2012-04-17 12:28 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-04-17 17:01 ` Mitar
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Antonio Quartulli @ 2012-04-17 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 816 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:05:40PM +0200, Mitar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What are the reasons (except for performance) of Batman being a kernel
> module? Is there a way for running it in user-space? We have some
> servers where we get donated bandwidth, but as people are running also
> other stuff on those servers they do not really like adding kernel
> modules and probably even rebooting servers for upgrading to newer
> Batman versions.
Why not using the out-of-the-tree batman-adv package? You can compile the latest
batman-adv module against the running kernel (it must be >=2.6.29). You can find
more details in the README.external file that you will find in the batman-adv
out-of-the-tree package.
Cheers,
--
Antonio Quartulli
..each of us alone is worth nothing..
Ernesto "Che" Guevara
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman as a kernel module
2012-04-17 12:28 ` Antonio Quartulli
@ 2012-04-17 17:01 ` Mitar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mitar @ 2012-04-17 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
Hi!
Thanks for both ideas. KVM sounds great.
OK, so I have no more ideas against Batman. :-) And it got a "go" from
Kostko. So this looks very good. :-)
Mitar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-17 17:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-17 12:05 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman as a kernel module Mitar
2012-04-17 12:10 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-04-17 12:28 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-04-17 17:01 ` Mitar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox