Openembedded Bitbake Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: is there a bitbake command to *just* fetch all necessary packages?
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:28:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340058517.1640.8.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDF99FB.2030503@windriver.com>

On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 16:13 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 6/18/12 4:08 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Robert P. J. Day<rpjday@crashcourse.ca>  wrote:
> >>
> >>   perhaps i'm just misreading the docs, but is there a bitbake
> >> incantation that does *nothing* more than fetch the packages needed
> >> for a target image?
> >>
> >>   if i use "bitbake -c fetchall", the result is not just to fetch the
> >> source, but to unload and patch it as well.
> >
> > hmmm I thought it did just what it says 'fetch all' but as you say it
> > seems to do more hmm I am not sure if its intended behavior
> 
> In order for fetchall to work, there are a few dependencies that have to be 
> executed as well..
> 
> But bitbake -c fetchall <target>, will fetch everything needed for the <target> 
> recipe.  It will extract and build only the items necessary for fetch to work 
> properly.

So just to be clear, the issues are git-native, potentially
subversion-native and also potentially pseudo-native getting built by
the wrapper. If you add those to ASSUME_PROVIDED, and skip the wrapper,
to avoid pseudo-native (or teach the wrapper to pass through -c fetchall
directly?) it will just fetch.

Cheers,

Richard




      reply	other threads:[~2012-06-18 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-18 20:10 is there a bitbake command to *just* fetch all necessary packages? Robert P. J. Day
2012-06-18 21:08 ` Khem Raj
2012-06-18 21:13   ` Mark Hatle
2012-06-18 22:28     ` Richard Purdie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1340058517.1640.8.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox