Openembedded Bitbake Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* About bitbake-runtask
@ 2011-08-09  9:29 Robert Yang
  2011-08-11 19:24 ` Richard Purdie
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert Yang @ 2011-08-09  9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Purdie, Richard; +Cc: bitbake-devel

Hi Richard,

The bitbake-runtask doesn't work currently, it seems that we have decommissioned it:

commit 1f3e313fd5cc5ae8ea838bf8fcdedace3cb72584
Author: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 8 00:08:04 2010 +0000

     bitbake Revert bitbake exec() and go back to fork() for performace wins 
(first draft)

But it is still in bitbake/bin/bitbake-runtask. There is a bug for tracking
this, what shall we do for it? Remove the bitbake-runtask or fix it and make
it work?

Bug 1229 - bitbake-runtask doesn't work in both 1.0.1 and 1.1

-- 
Thanks

Robert



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: About bitbake-runtask
  2011-08-09  9:29 About bitbake-runtask Robert Yang
@ 2011-08-11 19:24 ` Richard Purdie
  2011-08-16  8:27   ` Robert Yang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2011-08-11 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert Yang; +Cc: bitbake-devel

On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 17:29 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> The bitbake-runtask doesn't work currently, it seems that we have decommissioned it:
> 
> commit 1f3e313fd5cc5ae8ea838bf8fcdedace3cb72584
> Author: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
> Date:   Wed Dec 8 00:08:04 2010 +0000
> 
>      bitbake Revert bitbake exec() and go back to fork() for performace wins 
> (first draft)
> 
> But it is still in bitbake/bin/bitbake-runtask. There is a bug for tracking
> this, what shall we do for it? Remove the bitbake-runtask or fix it and make
> it work?
> 
> Bug 1229 - bitbake-runtask doesn't work in both 1.0.1 and 1.1

Since I know that script has user and a valid use case we need to:

a) Fix this to work after the fork() changes
b) Include it in bitbake upstream

b) never happened due to a).

Cheers,

Richard






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: About bitbake-runtask
  2011-08-11 19:24 ` Richard Purdie
@ 2011-08-16  8:27   ` Robert Yang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert Yang @ 2011-08-16  8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: bitbake-devel

Hi experts,

I'm trying to fix it, but it seems it's not easy for me to finish it
by Aug. 24th, it would be great if anyone can help me.

The bug is:

Bug 1229 - bitbake-runtask doesn't work in both 1.0.1 and 1.1

Thank you very much!

// Robert

On 08/12/2011 03:24 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 17:29 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> The bitbake-runtask doesn't work currently, it seems that we have decommissioned it:
>>
>> commit 1f3e313fd5cc5ae8ea838bf8fcdedace3cb72584
>> Author: Richard Purdie<rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
>> Date:   Wed Dec 8 00:08:04 2010 +0000
>>
>>       bitbake Revert bitbake exec() and go back to fork() for performace wins
>> (first draft)
>>
>> But it is still in bitbake/bin/bitbake-runtask. There is a bug for tracking
>> this, what shall we do for it? Remove the bitbake-runtask or fix it and make
>> it work?
>>
>> Bug 1229 - bitbake-runtask doesn't work in both 1.0.1 and 1.1
>
> Since I know that script has user and a valid use case we need to:
>
> a) Fix this to work after the fork() changes
> b) Include it in bitbake upstream
>
> b) never happened due to a).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-16  8:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-09  9:29 About bitbake-runtask Robert Yang
2011-08-11 19:24 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-16  8:27   ` Robert Yang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox