* should "bitbake -e" refer to per-recipe, not per-package?
@ 2014-07-22 10:19 Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-22 15:13 ` Christopher Larson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2014-07-22 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: BitBake developer list
i notice that, in "bitbake -h", the explanation of "bibake -e" is
that it potentially allows the display of "per-package" environment
info. should that not more accurately say "per-recipe"?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: should "bitbake -e" refer to per-recipe, not per-package?
2014-07-22 10:19 should "bitbake -e" refer to per-recipe, not per-package? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2014-07-22 15:13 ` Christopher Larson
2014-07-22 16:36 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Larson @ 2014-07-22 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: BitBake developer list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 458 bytes --]
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
wrote:
> i notice that, in "bitbake -h", the explanation of "bibake -e" is
> that it potentially allows the display of "per-package" environment
> info. should that not more accurately say "per-recipe"?
>
Yep.
--
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 897 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: should "bitbake -e" refer to per-recipe, not per-package?
2014-07-22 15:13 ` Christopher Larson
@ 2014-07-22 16:36 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2014-07-22 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Larson; +Cc: BitBake developer list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 849 bytes --]
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Christopher Larson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> i notice that, in "bitbake -h", the explanation of "bibake -e" is
> that it potentially allows the display of "per-package" environment
> info. should that not more accurately say "per-recipe"?
>
>
> Yep.
ok, i'll submit patch for that tonight.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-22 16:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-22 10:19 should "bitbake -e" refer to per-recipe, not per-package? Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-22 15:13 ` Christopher Larson
2014-07-22 16:36 ` Robert P. J. Day
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox