BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>
To: chenyuan_fl@163.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Nuoqi Gui <gnq25@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>,
	Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 17:15:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0560a24d-2cf9-4e5b-aa61-580af1e56de1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824143621.2098856-2-chenyuan_fl@163.com>

On 8/24/26 3:36 PM, chenyuan_fl@163.com wrote:
> From: Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
> 
> rhtab_delete_elem() and rhtab_map_update_existing() eagerly call
> bpf_obj_free_fields() when an element is deleted or its value is
> replaced. This runs kptr destructors in the caller's execution
> context, which is unsafe for BPF programs running in NMI context
> (e.g. perf_event programs attached to hardware PMU overflows):
> referenced kptr destructors may take locks or otherwise cannot run
> in NMI.
> 
> Commit a3a81d247651 ("bpf: Cancel special fields on map value
> recycle") switched the hash map and array recycle paths to
> bpf_obj_cancel_fields(), which only cancels NMI-safe fields (timer,
> workqueue, task_work), but it missed the resizable hashtab.
> rhtab_map_update_existing() even documents the intended "cancel"
> semantics while still calling bpf_obj_free_fields().
> 
> Fix the resizable hashtab the same way:
> 
>   * rhtab_delete_elem() and rhtab_map_update_existing() now cancel
>     only NMI-safe fields. Referenced kptrs stay attached to the
>     recycled element and are destroyed by rhtab_mem_dtor() once the
>     element is eventually freed, keeping the reference accounting
>     balanced.
> 
>   * rhtab_map_update_elem() initializes the special fields of a
>     freshly allocated element. The bpf memory allocator may return a
>     recycled element that still owns a referenced kptr, and
>     check_and_init_map_value() would zero that slot, dropping the
>     reference without releasing it. rhtab_init_map_value()
>     initializes the remaining fields (spin lock, timer, workqueue,
>     task_work, refcount) but leaves kptr slots untouched, matching
>     the hash map semantics.
> 
> Verified with a selftest: a perf_event (NMI) program overwrites a
> rhtab element that holds a referenced task kptr, and a second phase
> deletes and re-inserts the element to exercise the recycle path.
> Before the patch the NMI update eagerly released the kptr and the
> recycle path zeroed the inherited slot; after the patch the kptr is
> inherited on both paths and the probe observes it non-NULL.
> 
> Fixes: a3a81d247651 ("bpf: Cancel special fields on map value recycle")
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index d40cb5dd446c..0df8db27cd8c 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -2864,14 +2864,56 @@ static int rhtab_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
>  	return htab_map_alloc_check(attr);
>  }
>  
> -static void rhtab_check_and_free_fields(struct bpf_rhtab *rhtab,
> -					struct rhtab_elem *elem)
> +static void rhtab_cancel_fields(struct bpf_rhtab *rhtab,
> +				struct rhtab_elem *elem)
>  {
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rhtab->map.record))
>  		return;
>  
> -	bpf_obj_free_fields(rhtab->map.record,
> -			    rhtab_elem_value(elem, rhtab->map.key_size));
> +	/*
> +	 * Only cancel NMI-safe fields (timer, workqueue, task_work) here.
> +	 * RHASH values can also carry referenced kptrs (and per-cpu kptrs),
> +	 * whose destructors must not run from arbitrary BPF execution
> +	 * contexts (e.g. NMI); leave them attached to the recycled element
> +	 * and let rhtab_mem_dtor() destroy them once the element is
> +	 * eventually freed. This matches the hash map semantics introduced
> +	 * by a3a81d247651 ("bpf: Cancel special fields on map value
> +	 * recycle").
> +	 */
> +	bpf_map_free_internal_structs(&rhtab->map,
> +				      rhtab_elem_value(elem, rhtab->map.key_size));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Initialize special fields of a freshly allocated rhtab element, but keep
> + * kptr fields untouched. A recycled element may carry a referenced kptr from
> + * its previous life: the delete path only cancels NMI-safe fields (matching
> + * the hash map semantics), so the kptr reference stays owned by the element
> + * until rhtab_mem_dtor() destroys it. Zeroing it here (as
> + * check_and_init_map_value() would) would drop the reference without
> + * releasing it.
> + */
> +static void rhtab_init_map_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *value)

Could you please double check if this is needed at all?
I think bpf_map_free_internal_structs() going to reset
special fields to 0, so immediate reuse by __bpf_async_init(),
bpf_task_work_schedule() correctly identifies fresh fields.

> +{
> +	struct btf_record *rec = map->record;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rec))
> +		return;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < rec->cnt; i++) {
> +		struct btf_field *field = &rec->fields[i];
> +		void *field_ptr = value + field->offset;
> +
> +		switch (field->type) {
> +		case BPF_KPTR_UNREF:
> +		case BPF_KPTR_REF:
> +		case BPF_KPTR_PERCPU:
> +			continue;
> +		default:
> +			bpf_obj_init_field(field, field_ptr);
> +		}
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void rhtab_mem_dtor(void *obj, void *ctx)
> @@ -2963,8 +3005,8 @@ static int rhtab_delete_elem(struct bpf_rhtab *rhtab, struct rhtab_elem *elem, v
>  		rhtab_read_elem_value(&rhtab->map, copy, elem, flags);
>  		check_and_init_map_value(&rhtab->map, copy);
>  	}
> -	/* Release internal structs: kptr, bpf_timer, task_work, wq */
> -	rhtab_check_and_free_fields(rhtab, elem);
> +	/* Cancel NMI-safe fields; full destruction happens in rhtab_mem_dtor */
> +	rhtab_cancel_fields(rhtab, elem);

Let's directly call bpf_obj_cancel_fields() here and below, 
so it is consistent with htab.

>  	bpf_mem_cache_free_rcu(&rhtab->ma, elem);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -3022,10 +3064,11 @@ static long rhtab_map_update_existing(struct bpf_map *map, struct rhtab_elem *el
>  	 * BPF_F_LOCK, matching arraymap semantics.
>  	 *
>  	 * copy_map_value() skips special-field offsets, so old timers/
> -	 * kptrs/etc. still sit in the slot. Cancel them after the copy
> -	 * to match arraymap's update semantics.
> +	 * kptrs/etc. still sit in the slot. Cancel the NMI-safe ones after
> +	 * the copy to match arraymap's update semantics; referenced kptrs
> +	 * stay attached and are destroyed by rhtab_mem_dtor().
>  	 */
> -	rhtab_check_and_free_fields(rhtab, elem);
> +	rhtab_cancel_fields(rhtab, elem);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -3066,7 +3109,14 @@ static long rhtab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u
>  
>  	memcpy(elem->data, key, map->key_size);
>  	copy_map_value(map, rhtab_elem_value(elem, map->key_size), value);
> -	check_and_init_map_value(map, rhtab_elem_value(elem, map->key_size));
> +	/*
> +	 * Initialize special fields of the (possibly recycled) element, but
> +	 * leave kptr slots alone: a recycled element may still own a
> +	 * referenced kptr that rhtab_mem_dtor() will release, so zeroing it
> +	 * here would leak the reference. Fresh memory from the bpf mem
> +	 * allocator is zeroed, so skipping the kptr init is safe there too.
> +	 */
> +	rhtab_init_map_value(map, rhtab_elem_value(elem, map->key_size));
>  
>  	/* Prevent deadlock for NMI programs attempting to take bucket lock */
>  	bpf_disable_instrumentation();


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-24 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-11  9:55 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle chenyuan_fl
2026-08-11  9:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] " chenyuan_fl
2026-08-11 10:50   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-11  9:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab kptr recycle from NMI context chenyuan_fl
2026-08-11 11:08   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-11 14:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-24 14:36   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] " chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 14:36     ` [PATCH 1/4] " chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:00       ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42       ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 16:15       ` Mykyta Yatsenko [this message]
2026-08-24 14:36     ` [PATCH 2/4] bpf: Fix use-after-free of program BTF in mem-alloc destructor chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:17       ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42       ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 14:36     ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab kptr recycle from NMI context chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:28       ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42       ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 14:36     ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab special-field combinations chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:40       ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42       ` bot+bpf-ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0560a24d-2cf9-4e5b-aa61-580af1e56de1@gmail.com \
    --to=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenyuan@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=chenyuan_fl@163.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=gnq25@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox