From: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>
To: chenyuan_fl@163.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Nuoqi Gui <gnq25@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>,
Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 17:15:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0560a24d-2cf9-4e5b-aa61-580af1e56de1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824143621.2098856-2-chenyuan_fl@163.com>
On 8/24/26 3:36 PM, chenyuan_fl@163.com wrote:
> From: Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
>
> rhtab_delete_elem() and rhtab_map_update_existing() eagerly call
> bpf_obj_free_fields() when an element is deleted or its value is
> replaced. This runs kptr destructors in the caller's execution
> context, which is unsafe for BPF programs running in NMI context
> (e.g. perf_event programs attached to hardware PMU overflows):
> referenced kptr destructors may take locks or otherwise cannot run
> in NMI.
>
> Commit a3a81d247651 ("bpf: Cancel special fields on map value
> recycle") switched the hash map and array recycle paths to
> bpf_obj_cancel_fields(), which only cancels NMI-safe fields (timer,
> workqueue, task_work), but it missed the resizable hashtab.
> rhtab_map_update_existing() even documents the intended "cancel"
> semantics while still calling bpf_obj_free_fields().
>
> Fix the resizable hashtab the same way:
>
> * rhtab_delete_elem() and rhtab_map_update_existing() now cancel
> only NMI-safe fields. Referenced kptrs stay attached to the
> recycled element and are destroyed by rhtab_mem_dtor() once the
> element is eventually freed, keeping the reference accounting
> balanced.
>
> * rhtab_map_update_elem() initializes the special fields of a
> freshly allocated element. The bpf memory allocator may return a
> recycled element that still owns a referenced kptr, and
> check_and_init_map_value() would zero that slot, dropping the
> reference without releasing it. rhtab_init_map_value()
> initializes the remaining fields (spin lock, timer, workqueue,
> task_work, refcount) but leaves kptr slots untouched, matching
> the hash map semantics.
>
> Verified with a selftest: a perf_event (NMI) program overwrites a
> rhtab element that holds a referenced task kptr, and a second phase
> deletes and re-inserts the element to exercise the recycle path.
> Before the patch the NMI update eagerly released the kptr and the
> recycle path zeroed the inherited slot; after the patch the kptr is
> inherited on both paths and the probe observes it non-NULL.
>
> Fixes: a3a81d247651 ("bpf: Cancel special fields on map value recycle")
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index d40cb5dd446c..0df8db27cd8c 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -2864,14 +2864,56 @@ static int rhtab_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
> return htab_map_alloc_check(attr);
> }
>
> -static void rhtab_check_and_free_fields(struct bpf_rhtab *rhtab,
> - struct rhtab_elem *elem)
> +static void rhtab_cancel_fields(struct bpf_rhtab *rhtab,
> + struct rhtab_elem *elem)
> {
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rhtab->map.record))
> return;
>
> - bpf_obj_free_fields(rhtab->map.record,
> - rhtab_elem_value(elem, rhtab->map.key_size));
> + /*
> + * Only cancel NMI-safe fields (timer, workqueue, task_work) here.
> + * RHASH values can also carry referenced kptrs (and per-cpu kptrs),
> + * whose destructors must not run from arbitrary BPF execution
> + * contexts (e.g. NMI); leave them attached to the recycled element
> + * and let rhtab_mem_dtor() destroy them once the element is
> + * eventually freed. This matches the hash map semantics introduced
> + * by a3a81d247651 ("bpf: Cancel special fields on map value
> + * recycle").
> + */
> + bpf_map_free_internal_structs(&rhtab->map,
> + rhtab_elem_value(elem, rhtab->map.key_size));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Initialize special fields of a freshly allocated rhtab element, but keep
> + * kptr fields untouched. A recycled element may carry a referenced kptr from
> + * its previous life: the delete path only cancels NMI-safe fields (matching
> + * the hash map semantics), so the kptr reference stays owned by the element
> + * until rhtab_mem_dtor() destroys it. Zeroing it here (as
> + * check_and_init_map_value() would) would drop the reference without
> + * releasing it.
> + */
> +static void rhtab_init_map_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *value)
Could you please double check if this is needed at all?
I think bpf_map_free_internal_structs() going to reset
special fields to 0, so immediate reuse by __bpf_async_init(),
bpf_task_work_schedule() correctly identifies fresh fields.
> +{
> + struct btf_record *rec = map->record;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rec))
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < rec->cnt; i++) {
> + struct btf_field *field = &rec->fields[i];
> + void *field_ptr = value + field->offset;
> +
> + switch (field->type) {
> + case BPF_KPTR_UNREF:
> + case BPF_KPTR_REF:
> + case BPF_KPTR_PERCPU:
> + continue;
> + default:
> + bpf_obj_init_field(field, field_ptr);
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> static void rhtab_mem_dtor(void *obj, void *ctx)
> @@ -2963,8 +3005,8 @@ static int rhtab_delete_elem(struct bpf_rhtab *rhtab, struct rhtab_elem *elem, v
> rhtab_read_elem_value(&rhtab->map, copy, elem, flags);
> check_and_init_map_value(&rhtab->map, copy);
> }
> - /* Release internal structs: kptr, bpf_timer, task_work, wq */
> - rhtab_check_and_free_fields(rhtab, elem);
> + /* Cancel NMI-safe fields; full destruction happens in rhtab_mem_dtor */
> + rhtab_cancel_fields(rhtab, elem);
Let's directly call bpf_obj_cancel_fields() here and below,
so it is consistent with htab.
> bpf_mem_cache_free_rcu(&rhtab->ma, elem);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -3022,10 +3064,11 @@ static long rhtab_map_update_existing(struct bpf_map *map, struct rhtab_elem *el
> * BPF_F_LOCK, matching arraymap semantics.
> *
> * copy_map_value() skips special-field offsets, so old timers/
> - * kptrs/etc. still sit in the slot. Cancel them after the copy
> - * to match arraymap's update semantics.
> + * kptrs/etc. still sit in the slot. Cancel the NMI-safe ones after
> + * the copy to match arraymap's update semantics; referenced kptrs
> + * stay attached and are destroyed by rhtab_mem_dtor().
> */
> - rhtab_check_and_free_fields(rhtab, elem);
> + rhtab_cancel_fields(rhtab, elem);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -3066,7 +3109,14 @@ static long rhtab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u
>
> memcpy(elem->data, key, map->key_size);
> copy_map_value(map, rhtab_elem_value(elem, map->key_size), value);
> - check_and_init_map_value(map, rhtab_elem_value(elem, map->key_size));
> + /*
> + * Initialize special fields of the (possibly recycled) element, but
> + * leave kptr slots alone: a recycled element may still own a
> + * referenced kptr that rhtab_mem_dtor() will release, so zeroing it
> + * here would leak the reference. Fresh memory from the bpf mem
> + * allocator is zeroed, so skipping the kptr init is safe there too.
> + */
> + rhtab_init_map_value(map, rhtab_elem_value(elem, map->key_size));
>
> /* Prevent deadlock for NMI programs attempting to take bucket lock */
> bpf_disable_instrumentation();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-11 9:55 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle chenyuan_fl
2026-08-11 9:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] " chenyuan_fl
2026-08-11 10:50 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-11 9:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab kptr recycle from NMI context chenyuan_fl
2026-08-11 11:08 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-11 14:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] " chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] " chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 16:15 ` Mykyta Yatsenko [this message]
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] bpf: Fix use-after-free of program BTF in mem-alloc destructor chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab kptr recycle from NMI context chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab special-field combinations chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0560a24d-2cf9-4e5b-aa61-580af1e56de1@gmail.com \
--to=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenyuan@kylinos.cn \
--cc=chenyuan_fl@163.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=gnq25@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox