From: chenyuan_fl@163.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab kptr recycle from NMI context
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:55:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260811095531.3294167-3-chenyuan_fl@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811095531.3294167-1-chenyuan_fl@163.com>
From: Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
A perf_event program running in NMI context overwrites a rhtab element
whose value holds a referenced task kptr. The old kptr must stay attached
to the element (cancel semantics, matching hash maps); before the rhtab
recycle fix the NMI update eagerly released it and the probe observed
NULL.
The test skips when no hardware PMU is available.
Signed-off-by: Yuan Chen <chenyuan@kylinos.cn>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rhtab_kptr.c | 87 +++++++++++++++
.../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rhtab_kptr.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 188 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rhtab_kptr.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rhtab_kptr.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rhtab_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rhtab_kptr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..79bdcda95555
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rhtab_kptr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 KylinSoft Co., Ltd. */
+
+#include <linux/perf_event.h>
+#include <sys/syscall.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "rhtab_kptr.skel.h"
+
+static __u64 read_counter(struct rhtab_kptr *skel, u32 idx)
+{
+ __u64 vals[libbpf_num_possible_cpus()];
+ __u64 sum = 0;
+ int i, err;
+
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.counters), &idx, vals);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "lookup_counter"))
+ return 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < libbpf_num_possible_cpus(); i++)
+ sum += vals[i];
+ return sum;
+}
+
+void test_rhtab_kptr(void)
+{
+ struct perf_event_attr attr = {
+ .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
+ .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
+ .freq = 1,
+ .sample_freq = read_perf_max_sample_freq(),
+ .size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr),
+ };
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+ struct rhtab_kptr *skel;
+ __u32 key = 0;
+ __u64 zero = 0;
+ int pmu_fd;
+
+ skel = rhtab_kptr__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ /* Create the element and stash a referenced task kptr in it. */
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.rhtab),
+ &key, &zero, BPF_ANY), "create_elem"))
+ goto out;
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.init_elem),
+ &topts), "test_run_init") ||
+ !ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "init_ret"))
+ goto out;
+
+ pmu_fd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1, 0, -1, 0);
+ if (pmu_fd < 0) {
+ test__skip();
+ goto out;
+ }
+ skel->links.nmi_update = bpf_program__attach_perf_event(skel->progs.nmi_update,
+ pmu_fd);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.nmi_update, "attach_perf_event")) {
+ close(pmu_fd);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* Let the NMI handler overwrite the element. */
+ usleep(100000);
+
+ bpf_link__destroy(skel->links.nmi_update);
+ skel->links.nmi_update = NULL;
+ close(pmu_fd);
+
+ /*
+ * The old kptr must still be attached to the element: the NMI update
+ * path only cancels NMI-safe fields, mirroring hash map semantics.
+ * Before the fix the kptr was released from the NMI context and the
+ * probe below would see NULL.
+ */
+ topts.retval = 0;
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.probe_elem),
+ &topts), "test_run_probe") ||
+ !ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "probe_ret"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(read_counter(skel, 2), 1, "xchg_non_null");
+ ASSERT_EQ(read_counter(skel, 3), 0, "xchg_null");
+out:
+ rhtab_kptr__destroy(skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rhtab_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rhtab_kptr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..25800a2e24e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rhtab_kptr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2026 KylinSoft Co., Ltd. */
+
+/*
+ * Verify that a rhtab value update issued from a perf_event (NMI) program
+ * does not eagerly destroy referenced kptrs. rhtab must match the hash map
+ * semantics introduced by commit a3a81d247651 ("bpf: Cancel special fields
+ * on map value recycle"): only NMI-safe fields (timer, workqueue, task_work)
+ * are cancelled on update/delete, while kptrs stay attached to the recycled
+ * element until it is eventually freed.
+ *
+ * Without the fix, the NMI update releases the old kptr and probe_elem()
+ * observes NULL in the slot; with the fix the old kptr is inherited and
+ * probe_elem() observes a non-NULL pointer.
+ */
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+char LICENSE[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct val_t {
+ struct task_struct __kptr *tsk;
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RHASH);
+ __uint(max_entries, 16);
+ __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+ __type(key, __u32);
+ __type(value, struct val_t);
+} rhtab SEC(".maps");
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 4);
+ __type(key, __u32);
+ __type(value, __u64);
+} counters SEC(".maps");
+
+/* 0: init ok, 1: nmi update ok, 2: probe xchg non-NULL, 3: probe xchg NULL */
+static __always_inline void bump(u32 idx)
+{
+ u64 *v = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&counters, &idx);
+
+ if (v)
+ (*v)++;
+}
+
+extern struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire(struct task_struct *p) __ksym;
+extern void bpf_task_release(struct task_struct *p) __ksym;
+
+SEC("perf_event")
+int nmi_update(struct bpf_perf_event_data *ctx)
+{
+ struct val_t val = {};
+ u32 key = 0;
+
+ if (bpf_map_update_elem(&rhtab, &key, &val, BPF_ANY) == 0)
+ bump(1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int init_elem(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct val_t *val;
+ struct task_struct *task, *old;
+ u32 key = 0;
+
+ val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&rhtab, &key);
+ if (!val)
+ return 1;
+ task = bpf_task_acquire(bpf_get_current_task_btf());
+ if (!task)
+ return 2;
+ old = bpf_kptr_xchg(&val->tsk, task);
+ if (old)
+ bpf_task_release(old);
+ bump(0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int probe_elem(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct val_t *val;
+ struct task_struct *old;
+ u32 key = 0;
+
+ val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&rhtab, &key);
+ if (!val)
+ return 1;
+ old = bpf_kptr_xchg(&val->tsk, NULL);
+ if (old) {
+ bpf_task_release(old);
+ bump(2);
+ } else {
+ bump(3);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-11 9:55 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle chenyuan_fl
2026-08-11 9:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] " chenyuan_fl
2026-08-11 10:50 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-11 9:55 ` chenyuan_fl [this message]
2026-08-11 11:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab kptr recycle from NMI context bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-11 14:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] " chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] " chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 16:15 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] bpf: Fix use-after-free of program BTF in mem-alloc destructor chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab kptr recycle from NMI context chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test rhtab special-field combinations chenyuan_fl
2026-08-24 15:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 15:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260811095531.3294167-3-chenyuan_fl@163.com \
--to=chenyuan_fl@163.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenyuan@kylinos.cn \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox