* [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix use #ifdef instead of #if to avoid compiler warning
@ 2022-04-07 20:38 Andrii Nakryiko
2022-04-07 21:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2022-04-07 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, ast, daniel; +Cc: andrii, kernel-team, Naresh Kamboju, Stephen Rothwell
As reported by Naresh:
perf build errors on i386 [1] on Linux next-20220407 [2]
usdt.c:1181:5: error: "__x86_64__" is not defined, evaluates to 0
[-Werror=undef]
1181 | #if __x86_64__
| ^~~~~~~~~~
usdt.c:1196:5: error: "__x86_64__" is not defined, evaluates to 0
[-Werror=undef]
1196 | #if __x86_64__
| ^~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Use #ifdef instead of #if to avoid this.
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Fixes: 4c59e584d158 ("libbpf: Add x86-specific USDT arg spec parsing logic")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
index bb1e88613343..b699e720136a 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
@@ -1178,7 +1178,7 @@ static int calc_pt_regs_off(const char *reg_name)
const char *names[4];
size_t pt_regs_off;
} reg_map[] = {
-#if __x86_64__
+#ifdef __x86_64__
#define reg_off(reg64, reg32) offsetof(struct pt_regs, reg64)
#else
#define reg_off(reg64, reg32) offsetof(struct pt_regs, reg32)
@@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ static int calc_pt_regs_off(const char *reg_name)
{ {"rbp", "ebp", "bp", "bpl"}, reg_off(rbp, ebp) },
{ {"rsp", "esp", "sp", "spl"}, reg_off(rsp, esp) },
#undef reg_off
-#if __x86_64__
+#ifdef __x86_64__
{ {"r8", "r8d", "r8w", "r8b"}, offsetof(struct pt_regs, r8) },
{ {"r9", "r9d", "r9w", "r9b"}, offsetof(struct pt_regs, r9) },
{ {"r10", "r10d", "r10w", "r10b"}, offsetof(struct pt_regs, r10) },
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix use #ifdef instead of #if to avoid compiler warning
2022-04-07 20:38 [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix use #ifdef instead of #if to avoid compiler warning Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2022-04-07 21:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2022-04-07 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko; +Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, kernel-team, naresh.kamboju, sfr
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 13:38:42 -0700 you wrote:
> As reported by Naresh:
>
> perf build errors on i386 [1] on Linux next-20220407 [2]
>
> usdt.c:1181:5: error: "__x86_64__" is not defined, evaluates to 0
> [-Werror=undef]
> 1181 | #if __x86_64__
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> usdt.c:1196:5: error: "__x86_64__" is not defined, evaluates to 0
> [-Werror=undef]
> 1196 | #if __x86_64__
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] libbpf: fix use #ifdef instead of #if to avoid compiler warning
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ded6dffaed5e
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-07 21:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-07 20:38 [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix use #ifdef instead of #if to avoid compiler warning Andrii Nakryiko
2022-04-07 21:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox