* [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/7] bpf: Refactor ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR checks into process_dynptr_func
2022-12-07 20:41 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Dynptr refactorings Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
@ 2022-12-07 20:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/7] bpf: Propagate errors from process_* checks in check_func_arg Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2022-12-07 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: David Vernet, Joanne Koong, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau
ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR is akin to ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER, ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR, where
the underlying register type is subjected to more special checks to
determine the type of object represented by the pointer and its state
consistency.
Move dynptr checks to their own 'process_dynptr_func' function so that
is consistent and in-line with existing code. This also makes it easier
to reuse this code for kfunc handling.
Then, reuse this consolidated function in kfunc dynptr handling too.
Note that for kfuncs, the arg_type constraint of DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL has
been lifted.
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 8 +-
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 134 +++++++++---------
.../bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c | 7 +-
.../bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c | 12 --
4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 70d06a99f0b8..df0cb825e0e3 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -615,11 +615,9 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
enum bpf_arg_type arg_type);
int check_mem_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
u32 regno, u32 mem_size);
-bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
- struct bpf_reg_state *reg);
-bool is_dynptr_type_expected(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
- struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
- enum bpf_arg_type arg_type);
+struct bpf_call_arg_meta;
+int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
+ enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta);
/* this lives here instead of in bpf.h because it needs to dereference tgt_prog */
static inline u64 bpf_trampoline_compute_key(const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 8c5f0adbbde3..882181b14cf1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -810,8 +810,7 @@ static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_
return true;
}
-bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
- struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
+static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg);
int spi = get_spi(reg->off);
@@ -830,9 +829,8 @@ bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return true;
}
-bool is_dynptr_type_expected(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
- struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
- enum bpf_arg_type arg_type)
+static bool is_dynptr_type_expected(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
+ enum bpf_arg_type arg_type)
{
struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg);
enum bpf_dynptr_type dynptr_type;
@@ -5859,6 +5857,65 @@ static int process_kptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
return 0;
}
+int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
+ enum bpf_arg_type arg_type,
+ struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
+{
+ struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *reg = ®s[regno];
+
+ /* We only need to check for initialized / uninitialized helper
+ * dynptr args if the dynptr is not PTR_TO_DYNPTR, as the
+ * assumption is that if it is, that a helper function
+ * initialized the dynptr on behalf of the BPF program.
+ */
+ if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_DYNPTR)
+ return 0;
+ if (arg_type & MEM_UNINIT) {
+ if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg)) {
+ verbose(env, "Dynptr has to be an uninitialized dynptr\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* We only support one dynptr being uninitialized at the moment,
+ * which is sufficient for the helper functions we have right now.
+ */
+ if (meta->uninit_dynptr_regno) {
+ verbose(env, "verifier internal error: multiple uninitialized dynptr args\n");
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+
+ meta->uninit_dynptr_regno = regno;
+ } else {
+ if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg)) {
+ verbose(env,
+ "Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #%d\n",
+ regno);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (!is_dynptr_type_expected(env, reg, arg_type)) {
+ const char *err_extra = "";
+
+ switch (arg_type & DYNPTR_TYPE_FLAG_MASK) {
+ case DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL:
+ err_extra = "local";
+ break;
+ case DYNPTR_TYPE_RINGBUF:
+ err_extra = "ringbuf";
+ break;
+ default:
+ err_extra = "<unknown>";
+ break;
+ }
+ verbose(env,
+ "Expected a dynptr of type %s as arg #%d\n",
+ err_extra, regno);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static bool arg_type_is_mem_size(enum bpf_arg_type type)
{
return type == ARG_CONST_SIZE ||
@@ -6390,52 +6447,8 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
err = check_mem_size_reg(env, reg, regno, true, meta);
break;
case ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR:
- /* We only need to check for initialized / uninitialized helper
- * dynptr args if the dynptr is not PTR_TO_DYNPTR, as the
- * assumption is that if it is, that a helper function
- * initialized the dynptr on behalf of the BPF program.
- */
- if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_DYNPTR)
- break;
- if (arg_type & MEM_UNINIT) {
- if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg)) {
- verbose(env, "Dynptr has to be an uninitialized dynptr\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- /* We only support one dynptr being uninitialized at the moment,
- * which is sufficient for the helper functions we have right now.
- */
- if (meta->uninit_dynptr_regno) {
- verbose(env, "verifier internal error: multiple uninitialized dynptr args\n");
- return -EFAULT;
- }
-
- meta->uninit_dynptr_regno = regno;
- } else if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg)) {
- verbose(env,
- "Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #%d\n",
- arg + 1);
- return -EINVAL;
- } else if (!is_dynptr_type_expected(env, reg, arg_type)) {
- const char *err_extra = "";
-
- switch (arg_type & DYNPTR_TYPE_FLAG_MASK) {
- case DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL:
- err_extra = "local";
- break;
- case DYNPTR_TYPE_RINGBUF:
- err_extra = "ringbuf";
- break;
- default:
- err_extra = "<unknown>";
- break;
- }
- verbose(env,
- "Expected a dynptr of type %s as arg #%d\n",
- err_extra, arg + 1);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ if (process_dynptr_func(env, regno, arg_type, meta))
+ return -EACCES;
break;
case ARG_CONST_ALLOC_SIZE_OR_ZERO:
if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
@@ -8829,22 +8842,15 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_
return ret;
break;
case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR:
- if (reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK) {
- verbose(env, "arg#%d expected pointer to stack\n", i);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg)) {
- verbose(env, "arg#%d pointer type %s %s must be valid and initialized\n",
- i, btf_type_str(ref_t), ref_tname);
+ if (reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK &&
+ reg->type != PTR_TO_DYNPTR) {
+ verbose(env, "arg#%d expected pointer to stack or dynptr_ptr\n", i);
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (!is_dynptr_type_expected(env, reg, ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL)) {
- verbose(env, "arg#%d pointer type %s %s points to unsupported dynamic pointer type\n",
- i, btf_type_str(ref_t), ref_tname);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ ret = process_dynptr_func(env, regno, ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, NULL);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
break;
case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_LIST_HEAD:
if (reg->type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE &&
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c
index 55d641c1f126..a9229260a6ce 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_dynptr_param.c
@@ -18,11 +18,8 @@ static struct {
const char *expected_verifier_err_msg;
int expected_runtime_err;
} kfunc_dynptr_tests[] = {
- {"dynptr_type_not_supp",
- "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT bpf_dynptr_kern points to unsupported dynamic pointer type", 0},
- {"not_valid_dynptr",
- "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT bpf_dynptr_kern must be valid and initialized", 0},
- {"not_ptr_to_stack", "arg#0 expected pointer to stack", 0},
+ {"not_valid_dynptr", "Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #1", 0},
+ {"not_ptr_to_stack", "arg#0 expected pointer to stack or dynptr_ptr", 0},
{"dynptr_data_null", NULL, -EBADMSG},
};
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c
index ce39d096bba3..f4a8250329b2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_kfunc_dynptr_param.c
@@ -32,18 +32,6 @@ int err, pid;
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-SEC("?lsm.s/bpf")
-int BPF_PROG(dynptr_type_not_supp, int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr,
- unsigned int size)
-{
- char write_data[64] = "hello there, world!!";
- struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
-
- bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr(&ringbuf, sizeof(write_data), 0, &ptr);
-
- return bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(&ptr, &ptr, NULL);
-}
-
SEC("?lsm.s/bpf")
int BPF_PROG(not_valid_dynptr, int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size)
{
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/7] bpf: Propagate errors from process_* checks in check_func_arg
2022-12-07 20:41 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Dynptr refactorings Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/7] bpf: Refactor ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR checks into process_dynptr_func Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
@ 2022-12-07 20:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/7] bpf: Rework process_dynptr_func Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2022-12-07 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Joanne Koong, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, David Vernet
Currently, we simply ignore the errors in process_spin_lock,
process_timer_func, process_kptr_func, process_dynptr_func. Instead,
bubble up the error by storing and checking err variable.
Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 882181b14cf1..1af449c20a10 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6412,19 +6412,22 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
break;
case ARG_PTR_TO_SPIN_LOCK:
if (meta->func_id == BPF_FUNC_spin_lock) {
- if (process_spin_lock(env, regno, true))
- return -EACCES;
+ err = process_spin_lock(env, regno, true);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
} else if (meta->func_id == BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock) {
- if (process_spin_lock(env, regno, false))
- return -EACCES;
+ err = process_spin_lock(env, regno, false);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
} else {
verbose(env, "verifier internal error\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
break;
case ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER:
- if (process_timer_func(env, regno, meta))
- return -EACCES;
+ err = process_timer_func(env, regno, meta);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
break;
case ARG_PTR_TO_FUNC:
meta->subprogno = reg->subprogno;
@@ -6447,8 +6450,9 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
err = check_mem_size_reg(env, reg, regno, true, meta);
break;
case ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR:
- if (process_dynptr_func(env, regno, arg_type, meta))
- return -EACCES;
+ err = process_dynptr_func(env, regno, arg_type, meta);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
break;
case ARG_CONST_ALLOC_SIZE_OR_ZERO:
if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
@@ -6515,8 +6519,9 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
break;
}
case ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR:
- if (process_kptr_func(env, regno, meta))
- return -EACCES;
+ err = process_kptr_func(env, regno, meta);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
break;
}
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/7] bpf: Rework process_dynptr_func
2022-12-07 20:41 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Dynptr refactorings Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/7] bpf: Refactor ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR checks into process_dynptr_func Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/7] bpf: Propagate errors from process_* checks in check_func_arg Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
@ 2022-12-07 20:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/7] bpf: Rework check_func_arg_reg_off Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2022-12-07 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Joanne Koong, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, David Vernet
Recently, user ringbuf support introduced a PTR_TO_DYNPTR register type
for use in callback state, because in case of user ringbuf helpers,
there is no dynptr on the stack that is passed into the callback. To
reflect such a state, a special register type was created.
However, some checks have been bypassed incorrectly during the addition
of this feature. First, for arg_type with MEM_UNINIT flag which
initialize a dynptr, they must be rejected for such register type.
Secondly, in the future, there are plans to add dynptr helpers that
operate on the dynptr itself and may change its offset and other
properties.
In all of these cases, PTR_TO_DYNPTR shouldn't be allowed to be passed
to such helpers, however the current code simply returns 0.
The rejection for helpers that release the dynptr is already handled.
For fixing this, we take a step back and rework existing code in a way
that will allow fitting in all classes of helpers and have a coherent
model for dealing with the variety of use cases in which dynptr is used.
First, for ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, it can either be set alone or together
with a DYNPTR_TYPE_* constant that denotes the only type it accepts.
Next, helpers which initialize a dynptr use MEM_UNINIT to indicate this
fact. To make the distinction clear, use MEM_RDONLY flag to indicate
that the helper only operates on the memory pointed to by the dynptr,
not the dynptr itself. In C parlance, it would be equivalent to taking
the dynptr as a point to const argument.
When either of these flags are not present, the helper is allowed to
mutate both the dynptr itself and also the memory it points to.
Currently, the read only status of the memory is not tracked in the
dynptr, but it would be trivial to add this support inside dynptr state
of the register.
With these changes and renaming PTR_TO_DYNPTR to CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR to
better reflect its usage, it can no longer be passed to helpers that
initialize a dynptr, i.e. bpf_dynptr_from_mem, bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr.
A note to reviewers is that in code that does mark_stack_slots_dynptr,
and unmark_stack_slots_dynptr, we implicitly rely on the fact that
PTR_TO_STACK reg is the only case that can reach that code path, as one
cannot pass CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR to helpers that don't set MEM_RDONLY. In
both cases such helpers won't be setting that flag.
The next patch will add a couple of selftest cases to make sure this
doesn't break.
Fixes: 205715673844 ("bpf: Add bpf_user_ringbuf_drain() helper")
Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 4 +-
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 8 +-
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 18 +-
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 227 +++++++++++++-----
scripts/bpf_doc.py | 1 +
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 8 +-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c | 4 +-
7 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 4920ac252754..3de24cfb7a3d 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ enum bpf_reg_type {
PTR_TO_MEM, /* reg points to valid memory region */
PTR_TO_BUF, /* reg points to a read/write buffer */
PTR_TO_FUNC, /* reg points to a bpf program function */
- PTR_TO_DYNPTR, /* reg points to a dynptr */
+ CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, /* reg points to a const struct bpf_dynptr */
__BPF_REG_TYPE_MAX,
/* Extended reg_types. */
@@ -2828,7 +2828,7 @@ void bpf_dynptr_init(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr, void *data,
enum bpf_dynptr_type type, u32 offset, u32 size);
void bpf_dynptr_set_null(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr);
int bpf_dynptr_check_size(u32 size);
-u32 bpf_dynptr_get_size(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr);
+u32 bpf_dynptr_get_size(const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr);
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_LSM
void bpf_cgroup_atype_get(u32 attach_btf_id, int cgroup_atype);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index f89de51a45db..464ca3f01fe7 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -5293,7 +5293,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* Return
* Nothing. Always succeeds.
*
- * long bpf_dynptr_read(void *dst, u32 len, struct bpf_dynptr *src, u32 offset, u64 flags)
+ * long bpf_dynptr_read(void *dst, u32 len, const struct bpf_dynptr *src, u32 offset, u64 flags)
* Description
* Read *len* bytes from *src* into *dst*, starting from *offset*
* into *src*.
@@ -5303,7 +5303,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* of *src*'s data, -EINVAL if *src* is an invalid dynptr or if
* *flags* is not 0.
*
- * long bpf_dynptr_write(struct bpf_dynptr *dst, u32 offset, void *src, u32 len, u64 flags)
+ * long bpf_dynptr_write(const struct bpf_dynptr *dst, u32 offset, void *src, u32 len, u64 flags)
* Description
* Write *len* bytes from *src* into *dst*, starting from *offset*
* into *dst*.
@@ -5313,7 +5313,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* of *dst*'s data, -EINVAL if *dst* is an invalid dynptr or if *dst*
* is a read-only dynptr or if *flags* is not 0.
*
- * void *bpf_dynptr_data(struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, u32 offset, u32 len)
+ * void *bpf_dynptr_data(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, u32 offset, u32 len)
* Description
* Get a pointer to the underlying dynptr data.
*
@@ -5414,7 +5414,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* Drain samples from the specified user ring buffer, and invoke
* the provided callback for each such sample:
*
- * long (\*callback_fn)(struct bpf_dynptr \*dynptr, void \*ctx);
+ * long (\*callback_fn)(const struct bpf_dynptr \*dynptr, void \*ctx);
*
* If **callback_fn** returns 0, the helper will continue to try
* and drain the next sample, up to a maximum of
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 284b3ffdbe48..bf9a6a646254 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -1404,7 +1404,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_kptr_xchg_proto = {
#define DYNPTR_SIZE_MASK 0xFFFFFF
#define DYNPTR_RDONLY_BIT BIT(31)
-static bool bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
+static bool bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly(const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
{
return ptr->size & DYNPTR_RDONLY_BIT;
}
@@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ static void bpf_dynptr_set_type(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr, enum bpf_dynptr_typ
ptr->size |= type << DYNPTR_TYPE_SHIFT;
}
-u32 bpf_dynptr_get_size(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
+u32 bpf_dynptr_get_size(const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
{
return ptr->size & DYNPTR_SIZE_MASK;
}
@@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ void bpf_dynptr_set_null(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
memset(ptr, 0, sizeof(*ptr));
}
-static int bpf_dynptr_check_off_len(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr, u32 offset, u32 len)
+static int bpf_dynptr_check_off_len(const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr, u32 offset, u32 len)
{
u32 size = bpf_dynptr_get_size(ptr);
@@ -1483,7 +1483,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_dynptr_from_mem_proto = {
.arg4_type = ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL | MEM_UNINIT,
};
-BPF_CALL_5(bpf_dynptr_read, void *, dst, u32, len, struct bpf_dynptr_kern *, src,
+BPF_CALL_5(bpf_dynptr_read, void *, dst, u32, len, const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *, src,
u32, offset, u64, flags)
{
int err;
@@ -1506,12 +1506,12 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_dynptr_read_proto = {
.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
.arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM,
.arg2_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
- .arg3_type = ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR,
+ .arg3_type = ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | MEM_RDONLY,
.arg4_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
.arg5_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
-BPF_CALL_5(bpf_dynptr_write, struct bpf_dynptr_kern *, dst, u32, offset, void *, src,
+BPF_CALL_5(bpf_dynptr_write, const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *, dst, u32, offset, void *, src,
u32, len, u64, flags)
{
int err;
@@ -1532,14 +1532,14 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_dynptr_write_proto = {
.func = bpf_dynptr_write,
.gpl_only = false,
.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
- .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR,
+ .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | MEM_RDONLY,
.arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
.arg3_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY,
.arg4_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
.arg5_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
-BPF_CALL_3(bpf_dynptr_data, struct bpf_dynptr_kern *, ptr, u32, offset, u32, len)
+BPF_CALL_3(bpf_dynptr_data, const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *, ptr, u32, offset, u32, len)
{
int err;
@@ -1560,7 +1560,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_dynptr_data_proto = {
.func = bpf_dynptr_data,
.gpl_only = false,
.ret_type = RET_PTR_TO_DYNPTR_MEM_OR_NULL,
- .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR,
+ .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | MEM_RDONLY,
.arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
.arg3_type = ARG_CONST_ALLOC_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
};
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 1af449c20a10..fdbaf22cdaf2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static const char *reg_type_str(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
[PTR_TO_BUF] = "buf",
[PTR_TO_FUNC] = "func",
[PTR_TO_MAP_KEY] = "map_key",
- [PTR_TO_DYNPTR] = "dynptr_ptr",
+ [CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR] = "dynptr_ptr",
};
if (type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL) {
@@ -725,6 +725,28 @@ static bool dynptr_type_refcounted(enum bpf_dynptr_type type)
return type == BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_RINGBUF;
}
+static void __mark_dynptr_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
+ enum bpf_dynptr_type type,
+ bool first_slot);
+
+static void __mark_reg_not_init(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ struct bpf_reg_state *reg);
+
+static void mark_dynptr_stack_regs(struct bpf_reg_state *sreg1,
+ struct bpf_reg_state *sreg2,
+ enum bpf_dynptr_type type)
+{
+ __mark_dynptr_reg(sreg1, type, true);
+ __mark_dynptr_reg(sreg2, type, false);
+}
+
+static void mark_dynptr_cb_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
+ enum bpf_dynptr_type type)
+{
+ __mark_dynptr_reg(reg, type, true);
+}
+
+
static int mark_stack_slots_dynptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, int insn_idx)
{
@@ -746,9 +768,8 @@ static int mark_stack_slots_dynptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_
if (type == BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_INVALID)
return -EINVAL;
- state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.first_slot = true;
- state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type = type;
- state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type = type;
+ mark_dynptr_stack_regs(&state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr,
+ &state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr, type);
if (dynptr_type_refcounted(type)) {
/* The id is used to track proper releasing */
@@ -756,8 +777,8 @@ static int mark_stack_slots_dynptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_
if (id < 0)
return id;
- state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.id = id;
- state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr.id = id;
+ state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.ref_obj_id = id;
+ state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr.ref_obj_id = id;
}
return 0;
@@ -779,25 +800,23 @@ static int unmark_stack_slots_dynptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_re
}
/* Invalidate any slices associated with this dynptr */
- if (dynptr_type_refcounted(state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type)) {
- release_reference(env, state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.id);
- state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.id = 0;
- state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr.id = 0;
- }
-
- state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.first_slot = false;
- state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type = 0;
- state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type = 0;
+ if (dynptr_type_refcounted(state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type))
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(release_reference(env, state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.ref_obj_id));
+ __mark_reg_not_init(env, &state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr);
+ __mark_reg_not_init(env, &state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr);
return 0;
}
static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg);
- int spi = get_spi(reg->off);
- int i;
+ int spi, i;
+
+ if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR)
+ return false;
+ spi = get_spi(reg->off);
if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS))
return true;
@@ -813,9 +832,14 @@ static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_
static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg);
- int spi = get_spi(reg->off);
+ int spi;
int i;
+ /* This already represents first slot of initialized bpf_dynptr */
+ if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR)
+ return true;
+
+ spi = get_spi(reg->off);
if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS) ||
!state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.first_slot)
return false;
@@ -834,15 +858,19 @@ static bool is_dynptr_type_expected(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg
{
struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg);
enum bpf_dynptr_type dynptr_type;
- int spi = get_spi(reg->off);
+ int spi;
/* ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR takes any type of dynptr */
if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR)
return true;
dynptr_type = arg_to_dynptr_type(arg_type);
-
- return state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type == dynptr_type;
+ if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) {
+ return reg->dynptr.type == dynptr_type;
+ } else {
+ spi = get_spi(reg->off);
+ return state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type == dynptr_type;
+ }
}
/* The reg state of a pointer or a bounded scalar was saved when
@@ -1354,9 +1382,6 @@ static const int caller_saved[CALLER_SAVED_REGS] = {
BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_5
};
-static void __mark_reg_not_init(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
- struct bpf_reg_state *reg);
-
/* This helper doesn't clear reg->id */
static void ___mark_reg_known(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, u64 imm)
{
@@ -1419,6 +1444,19 @@ static void mark_reg_known_zero(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
__mark_reg_known_zero(regs + regno);
}
+static void __mark_dynptr_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, enum bpf_dynptr_type type,
+ bool first_slot)
+{
+ /* reg->type has no meaning for STACK_DYNPTR, but when we set reg for
+ * callback arguments, it does need to be CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, so simply
+ * set it unconditionally as it is ignored for STACK_DYNPTR anyway.
+ */
+ __mark_reg_known_zero(reg);
+ reg->type = CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR;
+ reg->dynptr.type = type;
+ reg->dynptr.first_slot = first_slot;
+}
+
static void mark_ptr_not_null_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) {
@@ -5857,19 +5895,58 @@ static int process_kptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
return 0;
}
+/* There are two register types representing a bpf_dynptr, one is PTR_TO_STACK
+ * which points to a stack slot, and the other is CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR.
+ *
+ * In both cases we deal with the first 8 bytes, but need to mark the next 8
+ * bytes as STACK_DYNPTR in case of PTR_TO_STACK. In case of
+ * CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, we are guaranteed to get the beginning of the object.
+ *
+ * Mutability of bpf_dynptr is at two levels, one is at the level of struct
+ * bpf_dynptr itself, i.e. whether the helper is receiving a pointer to struct
+ * bpf_dynptr or pointer to const struct bpf_dynptr. In the former case, it can
+ * mutate the view of the dynptr and also possibly destroy it. In the latter
+ * case, it cannot mutate the bpf_dynptr itself but it can still mutate the
+ * memory that dynptr points to.
+ *
+ * The verifier will keep track both levels of mutation (bpf_dynptr's in
+ * reg->type and the memory's in reg->dynptr.type), but there is no support for
+ * readonly dynptr view yet, hence only the first case is tracked and checked.
+ *
+ * This is consistent with how C applies the const modifier to a struct object,
+ * where the pointer itself inside bpf_dynptr becomes const but not what it
+ * points to.
+ *
+ * Helpers which do not mutate the bpf_dynptr set MEM_RDONLY in their argument
+ * type, and declare it as 'const struct bpf_dynptr *' in their prototype.
+ */
int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
- enum bpf_arg_type arg_type,
- struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
+ enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
{
struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *reg = ®s[regno];
- /* We only need to check for initialized / uninitialized helper
- * dynptr args if the dynptr is not PTR_TO_DYNPTR, as the
- * assumption is that if it is, that a helper function
- * initialized the dynptr on behalf of the BPF program.
+ /* MEM_UNINIT and MEM_RDONLY are exclusive, when applied to an
+ * ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR (or ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | DYNPTR_TYPE_*):
+ */
+ if ((arg_type & (MEM_UNINIT | MEM_RDONLY)) == (MEM_UNINIT | MEM_RDONLY)) {
+ verbose(env, "verifier internal error: misconfigured dynptr helper type flags\n");
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+ /* MEM_UNINIT - Points to memory that is an appropriate candidate for
+ * constructing a mutable bpf_dynptr object.
+ *
+ * Currently, this is only possible with PTR_TO_STACK
+ * pointing to a region of at least 16 bytes which doesn't
+ * contain an existing bpf_dynptr.
+ *
+ * MEM_RDONLY - Points to a initialized bpf_dynptr that will not be
+ * mutated or destroyed. However, the memory it points to
+ * may be mutated.
+ *
+ * None - Points to a initialized dynptr that can be mutated and
+ * destroyed, including mutation of the memory it points
+ * to.
*/
- if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_DYNPTR)
- return 0;
if (arg_type & MEM_UNINIT) {
if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg)) {
verbose(env, "Dynptr has to be an uninitialized dynptr\n");
@@ -5885,7 +5962,13 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
}
meta->uninit_dynptr_regno = regno;
- } else {
+ } else /* MEM_RDONLY and None case from above */ {
+ /* For the reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK case, bpf_dynptr is never const */
+ if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR && !(arg_type & MEM_RDONLY)) {
+ verbose(env, "cannot pass pointer to const bpf_dynptr, the helper mutates it\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg)) {
verbose(env,
"Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #%d\n",
@@ -5893,7 +5976,8 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (!is_dynptr_type_expected(env, reg, arg_type)) {
+ /* Fold modifiers (in this case, MEM_RDONLY) when checking expected type */
+ if (!is_dynptr_type_expected(env, reg, arg_type & ~MEM_RDONLY)) {
const char *err_extra = "";
switch (arg_type & DYNPTR_TYPE_FLAG_MASK) {
@@ -6056,7 +6140,7 @@ static const struct bpf_reg_types kptr_types = { .types = { PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE } }
static const struct bpf_reg_types dynptr_types = {
.types = {
PTR_TO_STACK,
- PTR_TO_DYNPTR | DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL,
+ CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR,
}
};
@@ -6241,12 +6325,16 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return __check_ptr_off_reg(env, reg, regno, fixed_off_ok);
}
-static u32 stack_slot_get_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
+static u32 dynptr_ref_obj_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg);
- int spi = get_spi(reg->off);
+ int spi;
+
+ if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR)
+ return reg->ref_obj_id;
- return state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.id;
+ spi = get_spi(reg->off);
+ return state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.ref_obj_id;
}
static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
@@ -6311,11 +6399,22 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
if (arg_type_is_release(arg_type)) {
if (arg_type_is_dynptr(arg_type)) {
struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg);
- int spi = get_spi(reg->off);
+ int spi;
- if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS) ||
- !state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.id) {
- verbose(env, "arg %d is an unacquired reference\n", regno);
+ /* Only dynptr created on stack can be released, thus
+ * the get_spi and stack state checks for spilled_ptr
+ * should only be done before process_dynptr_func for
+ * PTR_TO_STACK.
+ */
+ if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) {
+ spi = get_spi(reg->off);
+ if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS) ||
+ !state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.ref_obj_id) {
+ verbose(env, "arg %d is an unacquired reference\n", regno);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ } else {
+ verbose(env, "cannot release unowned const bpf_dynptr\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
} else if (!reg->ref_obj_id && !register_is_null(reg)) {
@@ -7289,11 +7388,10 @@ static int set_user_ringbuf_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
{
/* bpf_user_ringbuf_drain(struct bpf_map *map, void *callback_fn, void
* callback_ctx, u64 flags);
- * callback_fn(struct bpf_dynptr_t* dynptr, void *callback_ctx);
+ * callback_fn(const struct bpf_dynptr_t* dynptr, void *callback_ctx);
*/
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_0]);
- callee->regs[BPF_REG_1].type = PTR_TO_DYNPTR | DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL;
- __mark_reg_known_zero(&callee->regs[BPF_REG_1]);
+ mark_dynptr_cb_reg(&callee->regs[BPF_REG_1], BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL);
callee->regs[BPF_REG_2] = caller->regs[BPF_REG_3];
/* unused */
@@ -7687,7 +7785,15 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
regs = cur_regs(env);
+ /* This can only be set for PTR_TO_STACK, as CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR cannot
+ * be reinitialized by any dynptr helper. Hence, mark_stack_slots_dynptr
+ * is safe to do directly.
+ */
if (meta.uninit_dynptr_regno) {
+ if (regs[meta.uninit_dynptr_regno].type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) {
+ verbose(env, "verifier internal error: CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR cannot be initialized\n");
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
/* we write BPF_DW bits (8 bytes) at a time */
for (i = 0; i < BPF_DYNPTR_SIZE; i += 8) {
err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, meta.uninit_dynptr_regno,
@@ -7705,15 +7811,24 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
if (meta.release_regno) {
err = -EINVAL;
- if (arg_type_is_dynptr(fn->arg_type[meta.release_regno - BPF_REG_1]))
+ /* This can only be set for PTR_TO_STACK, as CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR cannot
+ * be released by any dynptr helper. Hence, unmark_stack_slots_dynptr
+ * is safe to do directly.
+ */
+ if (arg_type_is_dynptr(fn->arg_type[meta.release_regno - BPF_REG_1])) {
+ if (regs[meta.release_regno].type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) {
+ verbose(env, "verifier internal error: CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR cannot be released\n");
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
err = unmark_stack_slots_dynptr(env, ®s[meta.release_regno]);
- else if (meta.ref_obj_id)
+ } else if (meta.ref_obj_id) {
err = release_reference(env, meta.ref_obj_id);
- /* meta.ref_obj_id can only be 0 if register that is meant to be
- * released is NULL, which must be > R0.
- */
- else if (register_is_null(®s[meta.release_regno]))
+ } else if (register_is_null(®s[meta.release_regno])) {
+ /* meta.ref_obj_id can only be 0 if register that is meant to be
+ * released is NULL, which must be > R0.
+ */
err = 0;
+ }
if (err) {
verbose(env, "func %s#%d reference has not been acquired before\n",
func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
@@ -7787,11 +7902,7 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
return -EFAULT;
}
- if (base_type(reg->type) != PTR_TO_DYNPTR)
- /* Find the id of the dynptr we're
- * tracking the reference of
- */
- meta.ref_obj_id = stack_slot_get_id(env, reg);
+ meta.ref_obj_id = dynptr_ref_obj_id(env, reg);
break;
}
}
@@ -8848,12 +8959,12 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_
break;
case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR:
if (reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK &&
- reg->type != PTR_TO_DYNPTR) {
+ reg->type != CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) {
verbose(env, "arg#%d expected pointer to stack or dynptr_ptr\n", i);
return -EINVAL;
}
- ret = process_dynptr_func(env, regno, ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, NULL);
+ ret = process_dynptr_func(env, regno, ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | MEM_RDONLY, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
break;
diff --git a/scripts/bpf_doc.py b/scripts/bpf_doc.py
index fdb0aff8cb5a..e8d90829f23e 100755
--- a/scripts/bpf_doc.py
+++ b/scripts/bpf_doc.py
@@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ class PrinterHelpers(Printer):
'struct bpf_timer',
'struct mptcp_sock',
'struct bpf_dynptr',
+ 'const struct bpf_dynptr',
'struct iphdr',
'struct ipv6hdr',
}
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index f89de51a45db..464ca3f01fe7 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -5293,7 +5293,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* Return
* Nothing. Always succeeds.
*
- * long bpf_dynptr_read(void *dst, u32 len, struct bpf_dynptr *src, u32 offset, u64 flags)
+ * long bpf_dynptr_read(void *dst, u32 len, const struct bpf_dynptr *src, u32 offset, u64 flags)
* Description
* Read *len* bytes from *src* into *dst*, starting from *offset*
* into *src*.
@@ -5303,7 +5303,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* of *src*'s data, -EINVAL if *src* is an invalid dynptr or if
* *flags* is not 0.
*
- * long bpf_dynptr_write(struct bpf_dynptr *dst, u32 offset, void *src, u32 len, u64 flags)
+ * long bpf_dynptr_write(const struct bpf_dynptr *dst, u32 offset, void *src, u32 len, u64 flags)
* Description
* Write *len* bytes from *src* into *dst*, starting from *offset*
* into *dst*.
@@ -5313,7 +5313,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* of *dst*'s data, -EINVAL if *dst* is an invalid dynptr or if *dst*
* is a read-only dynptr or if *flags* is not 0.
*
- * void *bpf_dynptr_data(struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, u32 offset, u32 len)
+ * void *bpf_dynptr_data(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, u32 offset, u32 len)
* Description
* Get a pointer to the underlying dynptr data.
*
@@ -5414,7 +5414,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* Drain samples from the specified user ring buffer, and invoke
* the provided callback for each such sample:
*
- * long (\*callback_fn)(struct bpf_dynptr \*dynptr, void \*ctx);
+ * long (\*callback_fn)(const struct bpf_dynptr \*dynptr, void \*ctx);
*
* If **callback_fn** returns 0, the helper will continue to try
* and drain the next sample, up to a maximum of
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c
index 02b18d018b36..aefa0a474e58 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c
@@ -673,8 +673,8 @@ static struct {
{"user_ringbuf_callback_write_forbidden", "invalid mem access 'dynptr_ptr'"},
{"user_ringbuf_callback_null_context_write", "invalid mem access 'scalar'"},
{"user_ringbuf_callback_null_context_read", "invalid mem access 'scalar'"},
- {"user_ringbuf_callback_discard_dynptr", "arg 1 is an unacquired reference"},
- {"user_ringbuf_callback_submit_dynptr", "arg 1 is an unacquired reference"},
+ {"user_ringbuf_callback_discard_dynptr", "cannot release unowned const bpf_dynptr"},
+ {"user_ringbuf_callback_submit_dynptr", "cannot release unowned const bpf_dynptr"},
{"user_ringbuf_callback_invalid_return", "At callback return the register R0 has value"},
};
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/7] bpf: Rework check_func_arg_reg_off
2022-12-07 20:41 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Dynptr refactorings Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/7] bpf: Rework process_dynptr_func Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
@ 2022-12-07 20:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-12-09 2:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/7] bpf: Move PTR_TO_STACK alignment check to process_dynptr_func Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2022-12-07 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Joanne Koong, David Vernet, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau
While check_func_arg_reg_off is the place which performs generic checks
needed by various candidates of reg->type, there is some handling for
special cases, like ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, OBJ_RELEASE, and
ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM.
This commit aims to streamline these special cases and instead leave
other things up to argument type specific code to handle. The function
will be restrictive by default, and cover all possible cases when
OBJ_RELEASE is set, without having to update the function again (and
missing to do that being a bug).
This is done primarily for two reasons: associating back reg->type to
its argument leaves room for the list getting out of sync when a new
reg->type is supported by an arg_type.
The other case is ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM. The problem there is something
we already handle, whenever a release argument is expected, it should
be passed as the pointer that was received from the acquire function.
Hence zero fixed and variable offset.
There is nothing special about ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM, where technically
its target register type PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC can already be passed
with non-zero offset to other helper functions, which makes sense.
Hence, lift the arg_type_is_release check for reg->off and cover all
possible register types, instead of duplicating the same kind of check
twice for current OBJ_RELEASE arg_types (alloc_mem and ptr_to_btf_id).
For the release argument, arg_type_is_dynptr is the special case, where
we go to actual object being freed through the dynptr, so the offset of
the pointer still needs to allow fixed and variable offset and
process_dynptr_func will verify them later for the release argument case
as well.
This is not specific to ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR though, we will need to make
this exception for any future object on the stack that needs to be
released. In this sense, PTR_TO_STACK as a candidate for object on stack
argument is a special case for release offset checks, and they need to
be done by the helper releasing the object on stack.
Since the check has been lifted above all register type checks, remove
the duplicated check that is being done for PTR_TO_BTF_ID.
Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 64 +++++++++++--------
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 2 +-
.../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ringbuf.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index fdbaf22cdaf2..cadcf0233326 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6269,11 +6269,38 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int regno,
enum bpf_arg_type arg_type)
{
- enum bpf_reg_type type = reg->type;
- bool fixed_off_ok = false;
+ u32 type = reg->type;
- switch ((u32)type) {
- /* Pointer types where reg offset is explicitly allowed: */
+ /* When referenced register is passed to release function, its fixed
+ * offset must be 0.
+ *
+ * We will check arg_type_is_release reg has ref_obj_id when storing
+ * meta->release_regno.
+ */
+ if (arg_type_is_release(arg_type)) {
+ /* ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR with OBJ_RELEASE is a bit special, as it
+ * may not directly point to the object being released, but to
+ * dynptr pointing to such object, which might be at some offset
+ * on the stack. In that case, we simply to fallback to the
+ * default handling.
+ */
+ if (!arg_type_is_dynptr(arg_type) || type != PTR_TO_STACK) {
+ /* Doing check_ptr_off_reg check for the offset will
+ * catch this because fixed_off_ok is false, but
+ * checking here allows us to give the user a better
+ * error message.
+ */
+ if (reg->off) {
+ verbose(env, "R%d must have zero offset when passed to release func or trusted arg to kfunc\n",
+ regno);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ return __check_ptr_off_reg(env, reg, regno, false);
+ }
+ /* Fallback to default handling */
+ }
+ switch (type) {
+ /* Pointer types where both fixed and variable offset is explicitly allowed: */
case PTR_TO_STACK:
if (arg_type_is_dynptr(arg_type) && reg->off % BPF_REG_SIZE) {
verbose(env, "cannot pass in dynptr at an offset\n");
@@ -6290,12 +6317,7 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
case PTR_TO_BUF:
case PTR_TO_BUF | MEM_RDONLY:
case SCALAR_VALUE:
- /* Some of the argument types nevertheless require a
- * zero register offset.
- */
- if (base_type(arg_type) != ARG_PTR_TO_RINGBUF_MEM)
- return 0;
- break;
+ return 0;
/* All the rest must be rejected, except PTR_TO_BTF_ID which allows
* fixed offset.
*/
@@ -6305,24 +6327,16 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | PTR_TRUSTED:
/* When referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID is passed to release function,
- * it's fixed offset must be 0. In the other cases, fixed offset
- * can be non-zero.
+ * its fixed offset must be 0. In the other cases, fixed offset
+ * can be non-zero. This was already checked above. So pass
+ * fixed_off_ok as true to allow fixed offset for all other
+ * cases. var_off always must be 0 for PTR_TO_BTF_ID, hence we
+ * still need to do checks instead of returning.
*/
- if (arg_type_is_release(arg_type) && reg->off) {
- verbose(env, "R%d must have zero offset when passed to release func\n",
- regno);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- /* For arg is release pointer, fixed_off_ok must be false, but
- * we already checked and rejected reg->off != 0 above, so set
- * to true to allow fixed offset for all other cases.
- */
- fixed_off_ok = true;
- break;
+ return __check_ptr_off_reg(env, reg, regno, true);
default:
- break;
+ return __check_ptr_off_reg(env, reg, regno, false);
}
- return __check_ptr_off_reg(env, reg, regno, fixed_off_ok);
}
static u32 dynptr_ref_obj_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
index 3193915c5ee6..babcec123251 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "arg#0 expected pointer to ctx, but got PTR",
+ .errstr = "R1 must have zero offset when passed to release func or trusted arg to kfunc",
.fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
{ "bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass_ctx", 2 },
},
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ringbuf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ringbuf.c
index 84838feba47f..92e3f6a61a79 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ringbuf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ringbuf.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
},
.fixup_map_ringbuf = { 1 },
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "dereference of modified ringbuf_mem ptr R1",
+ .errstr = "R1 must have zero offset when passed to release func",
},
{
"ringbuf: invalid reservation offset 2",
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/7] bpf: Rework check_func_arg_reg_off
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/7] bpf: Rework check_func_arg_reg_off Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
@ 2022-12-09 2:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2022-12-09 2:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Cc: bpf, Joanne Koong, David Vernet, Alexei Starovoitov,
Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 02:11:38AM +0530, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> While check_func_arg_reg_off is the place which performs generic checks
> needed by various candidates of reg->type, there is some handling for
> special cases, like ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, OBJ_RELEASE, and
> ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM.
commit log is obsolete.
I cleaned it up s/ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM/ARG_PTR_TO_RINGBUF_MEM/
> This commit aims to streamline these special cases and instead leave
> other things up to argument type specific code to handle. The function
> will be restrictive by default, and cover all possible cases when
> OBJ_RELEASE is set, without having to update the function again (and
> missing to do that being a bug).
>
> This is done primarily for two reasons: associating back reg->type to
> its argument leaves room for the list getting out of sync when a new
> reg->type is supported by an arg_type.
>
> The other case is ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM. The problem there is something
> we already handle, whenever a release argument is expected, it should
> be passed as the pointer that was received from the acquire function.
> Hence zero fixed and variable offset.
>
> There is nothing special about ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM, where technically
> its target register type PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC can already be passed
and MEM_RINGBUF here.
> with non-zero offset to other helper functions, which makes sense.
>
> Hence, lift the arg_type_is_release check for reg->off and cover all
> possible register types, instead of duplicating the same kind of check
> twice for current OBJ_RELEASE arg_types (alloc_mem and ptr_to_btf_id).
>
> For the release argument, arg_type_is_dynptr is the special case, where
> we go to actual object being freed through the dynptr, so the offset of
> the pointer still needs to allow fixed and variable offset and
> process_dynptr_func will verify them later for the release argument case
> as well.
>
> This is not specific to ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR though, we will need to make
> this exception for any future object on the stack that needs to be
> released. In this sense, PTR_TO_STACK as a candidate for object on stack
> argument is a special case for release offset checks, and they need to
> be done by the helper releasing the object on stack.
>
> Since the check has been lifted above all register type checks, remove
> the duplicated check that is being done for PTR_TO_BTF_ID.
>
> Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 64 +++++++++++--------
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 2 +-
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ringbuf.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index fdbaf22cdaf2..cadcf0233326 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -6269,11 +6269,38 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int regno,
> enum bpf_arg_type arg_type)
> {
> - enum bpf_reg_type type = reg->type;
> - bool fixed_off_ok = false;
> + u32 type = reg->type;
>
> - switch ((u32)type) {
> - /* Pointer types where reg offset is explicitly allowed: */
> + /* When referenced register is passed to release function, its fixed
> + * offset must be 0.
> + *
> + * We will check arg_type_is_release reg has ref_obj_id when storing
> + * meta->release_regno.
> + */
> + if (arg_type_is_release(arg_type)) {
> + /* ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR with OBJ_RELEASE is a bit special, as it
> + * may not directly point to the object being released, but to
> + * dynptr pointing to such object, which might be at some offset
> + * on the stack. In that case, we simply to fallback to the
> + * default handling.
> + */
> + if (!arg_type_is_dynptr(arg_type) || type != PTR_TO_STACK) {
also removed one indent, inverted above and added direct 'return 0'
I know that it's not exactly the same, but together with patch 5
it makes it cleaner and this special case (that David didn't like)
doesn't look as horrible anymore.
> + /* Doing check_ptr_off_reg check for the offset will
> + * catch this because fixed_off_ok is false, but
> + * checking here allows us to give the user a better
> + * error message.
> + */
> + if (reg->off) {
> + verbose(env, "R%d must have zero offset when passed to release func or trusted arg to kfunc\n",
> + regno);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return __check_ptr_off_reg(env, reg, regno, false);
> + }
> + /* Fallback to default handling */
No 'fallback to default' either.
It wasn't easy to follow this logic.
And applied.
See how it looks now.
Overall looks like great cleanup. Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/7] bpf: Move PTR_TO_STACK alignment check to process_dynptr_func
2022-12-07 20:41 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Dynptr refactorings Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/7] bpf: Rework check_func_arg_reg_off Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
@ 2022-12-07 20:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/7] bpf: Use memmove for bpf_dynptr_{read,write} Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2022-12-07 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Joanne Koong, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, David Vernet
After previous commit, we are minimizing helper specific assumptions
from check_func_arg_reg_off, making it generic, and offloading checks
for a specific argument type to their respective functions called after
check_func_arg_reg_off has been called.
This allows relying on a consistent set of guarantees after that call
and then relying on them in code that deals with registers for each
argument type later. This is in line with how process_spin_lock,
process_timer_func, process_kptr_func check reg->var_off to be constant.
The same reasoning is used here to move the alignment check into
process_dynptr_func. Note that it also needs to check for constant
var_off, and accumulate the constant var_off when computing the spi in
get_spi, but that fix will come in later changes.
Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index cadcf0233326..e10a21cd21a8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5932,6 +5932,14 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
verbose(env, "verifier internal error: misconfigured dynptr helper type flags\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
+ /* CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR already has fixed and var_off as 0 due to
+ * check_func_arg_reg_off's logic. We only need to check offset
+ * alignment for PTR_TO_STACK.
+ */
+ if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK && (reg->off % BPF_REG_SIZE)) {
+ verbose(env, "cannot pass in dynptr at an offset=%d\n", reg->off);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
/* MEM_UNINIT - Points to memory that is an appropriate candidate for
* constructing a mutable bpf_dynptr object.
*
@@ -6302,11 +6310,6 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
switch (type) {
/* Pointer types where both fixed and variable offset is explicitly allowed: */
case PTR_TO_STACK:
- if (arg_type_is_dynptr(arg_type) && reg->off % BPF_REG_SIZE) {
- verbose(env, "cannot pass in dynptr at an offset\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- fallthrough;
case PTR_TO_PACKET:
case PTR_TO_PACKET_META:
case PTR_TO_MAP_KEY:
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/7] bpf: Use memmove for bpf_dynptr_{read,write}
2022-12-07 20:41 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Dynptr refactorings Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/7] bpf: Move PTR_TO_STACK alignment check to process_dynptr_func Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
@ 2022-12-07 20:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add test for dynptr reinit in user_ringbuf callback Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-12-09 2:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Dynptr refactorings patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2022-12-07 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Joanne Koong, David Vernet, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau
It may happen that destination buffer memory overlaps with memory dynptr
points to. Hence, we must use memmove to correctly copy from dynptr to
destination buffer, or source buffer to dynptr.
This actually isn't a problem right now, as memcpy implementation falls
back to memmove on detecting overlap and warns about it, but we
shouldn't be relying on that.
Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index bf9a6a646254..842229671af0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -1495,7 +1495,11 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_dynptr_read, void *, dst, u32, len, const struct bpf_dynptr_kern
if (err)
return err;
- memcpy(dst, src->data + src->offset + offset, len);
+ /* Source and destination may possibly overlap, hence use memmove to
+ * copy the data. E.g. bpf_dynptr_from_mem may create two dynptr
+ * pointing to overlapping PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE regions.
+ */
+ memmove(dst, src->data + src->offset + offset, len);
return 0;
}
@@ -1523,7 +1527,11 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_dynptr_write, const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *, dst, u32, offset, v
if (err)
return err;
- memcpy(dst->data + dst->offset + offset, src, len);
+ /* Source and destination may possibly overlap, hence use memmove to
+ * copy the data. E.g. bpf_dynptr_from_mem may create two dynptr
+ * pointing to overlapping PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE regions.
+ */
+ memmove(dst->data + dst->offset + offset, src, len);
return 0;
}
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add test for dynptr reinit in user_ringbuf callback
2022-12-07 20:41 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Dynptr refactorings Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/7] bpf: Use memmove for bpf_dynptr_{read,write} Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
@ 2022-12-07 20:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-12-09 2:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Dynptr refactorings patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2022-12-07 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: David Vernet, Joanne Koong, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko,
Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau
The original support for bpf_user_ringbuf_drain callbacks simply
short-circuited checks for the dynptr state, allowing users to pass
PTR_TO_DYNPTR (now CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) to helpers that initialize a
dynptr. This bug would have also surfaced with other dynptr helpers in
the future that changed dynptr view or modified it in some way.
Include test cases for all cases, i.e. both bpf_dynptr_from_mem and
bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr, and ensure verifier rejects both of them.
Without the fix, both of these programs load and pass verification.
While at it, remove sys_nanosleep target from failure cases' SEC
definition, as there is no such tracepoint.
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/user_ringbuf_fail.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c
index aefa0a474e58..dae68de285b9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c
@@ -676,6 +676,8 @@ static struct {
{"user_ringbuf_callback_discard_dynptr", "cannot release unowned const bpf_dynptr"},
{"user_ringbuf_callback_submit_dynptr", "cannot release unowned const bpf_dynptr"},
{"user_ringbuf_callback_invalid_return", "At callback return the register R0 has value"},
+ {"user_ringbuf_callback_reinit_dynptr_mem", "Dynptr has to be an uninitialized dynptr"},
+ {"user_ringbuf_callback_reinit_dynptr_ringbuf", "Dynptr has to be an uninitialized dynptr"},
};
#define SUCCESS_TEST(_func) { _func, #_func }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/user_ringbuf_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/user_ringbuf_fail.c
index 82aba4529aa9..f3201dc69a60 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/user_ringbuf_fail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/user_ringbuf_fail.c
@@ -18,6 +18,13 @@ struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_USER_RINGBUF);
} user_ringbuf SEC(".maps");
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF);
+ __uint(max_entries, 2);
+} ringbuf SEC(".maps");
+
+static int map_value;
+
static long
bad_access1(struct bpf_dynptr *dynptr, void *context)
{
@@ -32,7 +39,7 @@ bad_access1(struct bpf_dynptr *dynptr, void *context)
/* A callback that accesses a dynptr in a bpf_user_ringbuf_drain callback should
* not be able to read before the pointer.
*/
-SEC("?raw_tp/sys_nanosleep")
+SEC("?raw_tp/")
int user_ringbuf_callback_bad_access1(void *ctx)
{
bpf_user_ringbuf_drain(&user_ringbuf, bad_access1, NULL, 0);
@@ -54,7 +61,7 @@ bad_access2(struct bpf_dynptr *dynptr, void *context)
/* A callback that accesses a dynptr in a bpf_user_ringbuf_drain callback should
* not be able to read past the end of the pointer.
*/
-SEC("?raw_tp/sys_nanosleep")
+SEC("?raw_tp/")
int user_ringbuf_callback_bad_access2(void *ctx)
{
bpf_user_ringbuf_drain(&user_ringbuf, bad_access2, NULL, 0);
@@ -73,7 +80,7 @@ write_forbidden(struct bpf_dynptr *dynptr, void *context)
/* A callback that accesses a dynptr in a bpf_user_ringbuf_drain callback should
* not be able to write to that pointer.
*/
-SEC("?raw_tp/sys_nanosleep")
+SEC("?raw_tp/")
int user_ringbuf_callback_write_forbidden(void *ctx)
{
bpf_user_ringbuf_drain(&user_ringbuf, write_forbidden, NULL, 0);
@@ -92,7 +99,7 @@ null_context_write(struct bpf_dynptr *dynptr, void *context)
/* A callback that accesses a dynptr in a bpf_user_ringbuf_drain callback should
* not be able to write to that pointer.
*/
-SEC("?raw_tp/sys_nanosleep")
+SEC("?raw_tp/")
int user_ringbuf_callback_null_context_write(void *ctx)
{
bpf_user_ringbuf_drain(&user_ringbuf, null_context_write, NULL, 0);
@@ -113,7 +120,7 @@ null_context_read(struct bpf_dynptr *dynptr, void *context)
/* A callback that accesses a dynptr in a bpf_user_ringbuf_drain callback should
* not be able to write to that pointer.
*/
-SEC("?raw_tp/sys_nanosleep")
+SEC("?raw_tp/")
int user_ringbuf_callback_null_context_read(void *ctx)
{
bpf_user_ringbuf_drain(&user_ringbuf, null_context_read, NULL, 0);
@@ -132,7 +139,7 @@ try_discard_dynptr(struct bpf_dynptr *dynptr, void *context)
/* A callback that accesses a dynptr in a bpf_user_ringbuf_drain callback should
* not be able to read past the end of the pointer.
*/
-SEC("?raw_tp/sys_nanosleep")
+SEC("?raw_tp/")
int user_ringbuf_callback_discard_dynptr(void *ctx)
{
bpf_user_ringbuf_drain(&user_ringbuf, try_discard_dynptr, NULL, 0);
@@ -151,7 +158,7 @@ try_submit_dynptr(struct bpf_dynptr *dynptr, void *context)
/* A callback that accesses a dynptr in a bpf_user_ringbuf_drain callback should
* not be able to read past the end of the pointer.
*/
-SEC("?raw_tp/sys_nanosleep")
+SEC("?raw_tp/")
int user_ringbuf_callback_submit_dynptr(void *ctx)
{
bpf_user_ringbuf_drain(&user_ringbuf, try_submit_dynptr, NULL, 0);
@@ -168,10 +175,38 @@ invalid_drain_callback_return(struct bpf_dynptr *dynptr, void *context)
/* A callback that accesses a dynptr in a bpf_user_ringbuf_drain callback should
* not be able to write to that pointer.
*/
-SEC("?raw_tp/sys_nanosleep")
+SEC("?raw_tp/")
int user_ringbuf_callback_invalid_return(void *ctx)
{
bpf_user_ringbuf_drain(&user_ringbuf, invalid_drain_callback_return, NULL, 0);
return 0;
}
+
+static long
+try_reinit_dynptr_mem(struct bpf_dynptr *dynptr, void *context)
+{
+ bpf_dynptr_from_mem(&map_value, 4, 0, dynptr);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static long
+try_reinit_dynptr_ringbuf(struct bpf_dynptr *dynptr, void *context)
+{
+ bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr(&ringbuf, 8, 0, dynptr);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?raw_tp/")
+int user_ringbuf_callback_reinit_dynptr_mem(void *ctx)
+{
+ bpf_user_ringbuf_drain(&user_ringbuf, try_reinit_dynptr_mem, NULL, 0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?raw_tp/")
+int user_ringbuf_callback_reinit_dynptr_ringbuf(void *ctx)
+{
+ bpf_user_ringbuf_drain(&user_ringbuf, try_reinit_dynptr_ringbuf, NULL, 0);
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Dynptr refactorings
2022-12-07 20:41 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Dynptr refactorings Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-07 20:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add test for dynptr reinit in user_ringbuf callback Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
@ 2022-12-09 2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
7 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2022-12-09 2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Cc: bpf, ast, andrii, daniel, martin.lau, joannelkoong, void
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 02:11:34 +0530 you wrote:
> This is part 1 of https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221018135920.726360-1-memxor@gmail.com.
> This thread also gives some background on why the refactor is being done:
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4Bzb4beTHgVo+G+jehSj8oCeAjRbRcm6MRe=Gr+cajRBwEw@mail.gmail.com
>
> As requested in patch 6 by Alexei, it only includes patches which
> refactors the code, on top of which further fixes will be made in part
> 2. The refactor itself fixes another issue as a side effect. No
> functional change is intended (except a few modified log messages).
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v2,1/7] bpf: Refactor ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR checks into process_dynptr_func
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6b75bd3d0367
- [bpf-next,v2,2/7] bpf: Propagate errors from process_* checks in check_func_arg
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ac50fe51ce87
- [bpf-next,v2,3/7] bpf: Rework process_dynptr_func
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/270605317366
- [bpf-next,v2,4/7] bpf: Rework check_func_arg_reg_off
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/184c9bdb8f65
- [bpf-next,v2,5/7] bpf: Move PTR_TO_STACK alignment check to process_dynptr_func
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f6ee298fa140
- [bpf-next,v2,6/7] bpf: Use memmove for bpf_dynptr_{read,write}
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/76d16077bef0
- [bpf-next,v2,7/7] selftests/bpf: Add test for dynptr reinit in user_ringbuf callback
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/292064cce796
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread