BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	laoar.shao@gmail.com, olsajiri@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs macros
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 06:00:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <169890482499.9002.3938790944237757134.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231031215625.2343848-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com>

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 14:56:24 -0700 you wrote:
> BPF kfuncs are meant to be called from BPF programs. Accordingly, most
> kfuncs are not called from anywhere in the kernel, which the
> -Wmissing-prototypes warning is unhappy about. We've peppered
> __diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes", ... everywhere kfuncs are
> defined in the codebase to suppress this warning.
> 
> This patch adds two macros meant to bound one or many kfunc definitions.
> All existing kfunc definitions which use these __diag calls to suppress
> -Wmissing-prototypes are migrated to use the newly-introduced macros.
> A new __diag_ignore_all - for "-Wmissing-declarations" - is added to the
> __bpf_kfunc_start_defs macro based on feedback from Andrii on an earlier
> version of this patch [0] and another recent mailing list thread [1].
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,bpf-next,1/2] bpf: Add __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs macros
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/391145ba2acc
  - [v2,bpf-next,2/2] bpf: Add __bpf_hook_{start,end} macros
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/15fb6f2b6c4c

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-02  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-31 21:56 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs macros Dave Marchevsky
2023-10-31 21:56 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Add __bpf_hook_{start,end} macros Dave Marchevsky
2023-10-31 23:03   ` Jiri Olsa
2023-11-01  2:17     ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-31 23:03 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs macros Jiri Olsa
2023-11-01  1:39 ` David Vernet
2023-11-01  2:19 ` Yafang Shao
2023-11-02  6:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=169890482499.9002.3938790944237757134.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox