BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	laoar.shao@gmail.com, Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs macros
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 20:39:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231101013950.GA11478@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231031215625.2343848-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com>

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 02:56:24PM -0700, Dave Marchevsky wrote:
> BPF kfuncs are meant to be called from BPF programs. Accordingly, most
> kfuncs are not called from anywhere in the kernel, which the
> -Wmissing-prototypes warning is unhappy about. We've peppered
> __diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes", ... everywhere kfuncs are
> defined in the codebase to suppress this warning.
> 
> This patch adds two macros meant to bound one or many kfunc definitions.
> All existing kfunc definitions which use these __diag calls to suppress
> -Wmissing-prototypes are migrated to use the newly-introduced macros.
> A new __diag_ignore_all - for "-Wmissing-declarations" - is added to the
> __bpf_kfunc_start_defs macro based on feedback from Andrii on an earlier
> version of this patch [0] and another recent mailing list thread [1].
> 
> In the future we might need to ignore different warnings or do other
> kfunc-specific things. This change will make it easier to make such
> modifications for all kfunc defs.
> 
>   [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzaE5dRWtK6RPLnjTW-MW9sx9K3Fn6uwqCTChK2Dcb1Xig@mail.gmail.com/
>   [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZT+2qCc%2FaXep0%2FLf@krava/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>

Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>

Thanks for taking care of this!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-01  1:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-31 21:56 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs macros Dave Marchevsky
2023-10-31 21:56 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Add __bpf_hook_{start,end} macros Dave Marchevsky
2023-10-31 23:03   ` Jiri Olsa
2023-11-01  2:17     ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-31 23:03 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs macros Jiri Olsa
2023-11-01  1:39 ` David Vernet [this message]
2023-11-01  2:19 ` Yafang Shao
2023-11-02  6:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231101013950.GA11478@maniforge \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox