* [PATCH v2] riscv, bpf: Use STACK_ALIGN macro for size rounding up
@ 2024-05-23 3:18 Xiao Wang
2024-05-24 15:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Xiao Wang @ 2024-05-23 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paul.walmsley, palmer, aou, luke.r.nels, xi.wang, bjorn
Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, linux-riscv,
linux-kernel, bpf, pulehui, haicheng.li, Xiao Wang
Use the macro STACK_ALIGN that is defined in asm/processor.h for stack size
rounding up, just like bpf_jit_comp32.c does.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
---
v2:
* The patch targets bpf-next tree, rather than riscv-next. (Lehui)
---
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 79a001d5533e..c21a0ff23415 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
stack_size += 8;
sreg_off = stack_size;
- stack_size = round_up(stack_size, 16);
+ stack_size = round_up(stack_size, STACK_ALIGN);
if (!is_struct_ops) {
/* For the trampoline called from function entry,
@@ -1960,7 +1960,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct rv_jit_context *ctx, bool is_subprog)
{
int i, stack_adjust = 0, store_offset, bpf_stack_adjust;
- bpf_stack_adjust = round_up(ctx->prog->aux->stack_depth, 16);
+ bpf_stack_adjust = round_up(ctx->prog->aux->stack_depth, STACK_ALIGN);
if (bpf_stack_adjust)
mark_fp(ctx);
@@ -1982,7 +1982,7 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct rv_jit_context *ctx, bool is_subprog)
if (ctx->arena_vm_start)
stack_adjust += 8;
- stack_adjust = round_up(stack_adjust, 16);
+ stack_adjust = round_up(stack_adjust, STACK_ALIGN);
stack_adjust += bpf_stack_adjust;
store_offset = stack_adjust - 8;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] riscv, bpf: Use STACK_ALIGN macro for size rounding up
2024-05-23 3:18 [PATCH v2] riscv, bpf: Use STACK_ALIGN macro for size rounding up Xiao Wang
@ 2024-05-24 15:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2024-05-24 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wang, Xiao W
Cc: paul.walmsley, palmer, aou, luke.r.nels, xi.wang, bjorn, ast,
daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, linux-riscv,
linux-kernel, bpf, pulehui, haicheng.li
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:
On Thu, 23 May 2024 11:18:35 +0800 you wrote:
> Use the macro STACK_ALIGN that is defined in asm/processor.h for stack size
> rounding up, just like bpf_jit_comp32.c does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * The patch targets bpf-next tree, rather than riscv-next. (Lehui)
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2] riscv, bpf: Use STACK_ALIGN macro for size rounding up
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e944fc815274
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-24 15:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-23 3:18 [PATCH v2] riscv, bpf: Use STACK_ALIGN macro for size rounding up Xiao Wang
2024-05-24 15:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox