Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] follow up for __jited test tag

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 01:06:41 -0700 you wrote:
> This patch-set is a collection of follow-ups for
> "__jited test tag to check disassembly after jit" series (see [1]).
> 
> First patch is most important:
> as it turns out, I broke all test_loader based tests for s390 CI.
> E.g. see log [2] for s390 execution of test_progs,
> note all 'verivier_*' tests being skipped.
> This happens because of incorrect handling of corner case when
> get_current_arch() does not know which architecture to return.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,1/3] selftests/bpf: test_loader.c:get_current_arch() should not return 0
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ec1f77f6557b
  - [bpf-next,2/3] selftests/bpf: match both retq/rethunk in verifier_tailcall_jit
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c52a1e6eb74f
  - [bpf-next,3/3] selftests/bpf: #define LOCAL_LABEL_LEN for jit_disasm_helpers.c
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/21a56fc503fa

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html