[PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: match both retq/rethunk in verifier_tailcall_jit

[Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>]

Depending on kernel parameters, x86 jit generates either retq or jump
to rethunk for 'exit' instruction. The difference could be seen when
kernel is booted with and without mitigations=off parameter.
Relax the verifier_tailcall_jit test case to match both variants.

Fixes: e5bdd6a8be78 ("selftests/bpf: validate jit behaviour for tail calls")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall_jit.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall_jit.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall_jit.c
index 06d327cf1e1f..8d60c634a114 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall_jit.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall_jit.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ __jited("	movq	-0x10(%rbp), %rax")
 __jited("	callq	0x{{.*}}")		/* call to sub()          */
 __jited("	xorl	%eax, %eax")
 __jited("	leave")
-__jited("	retq")
+__jited("	{{(retq|jmp	0x)}}")		/* return or jump to rethunk */
 __jited("...")
 /* subprogram entry for sub(), regular function prologue */
 __jited("	endbr64")
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ __jited("	popq	%rax")
 __jited("	popq	%rax")
 __jited("	jmp	{{.*}}")		/* jump to tail call tgt   */
 __jited("L0:	leave")
-__jited("	retq")
+__jited("	{{(retq|jmp	0x)}}")		/* return or jump to rethunk */
 SEC("tc")
 __naked int main(void)
 {
-- 
2.46.0