From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 02:20:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174235083449.538922.7268862639090608979.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250318114447.75484-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:44:45 +0800 you wrote:
> Attaching fexit probes to functions marked with __noreturn may lead to
> unpredictable behavior. To avoid this, we will reject attaching probes to
> such functions. Currently, there is no ideal solution, so we will hardcode
> a check for all __noreturn functions.
>
> Once a more robust solution is implemented, this workaround can be removed.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v5,1/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/cfe816d469dc
- [bpf-next,v5,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit to __noreturn functions
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/be16ddeaae96
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-19 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 11:44 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions Yafang Shao
2025-03-18 11:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/2] " Yafang Shao
2025-03-18 11:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit " Yafang Shao
2025-03-19 2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174235083449.538922.7268862639090608979.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox