* [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
2025-03-18 11:44 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions Yafang Shao
@ 2025-03-18 11:44 ` Yafang Shao
2025-03-18 11:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit " Yafang Shao
2025-03-19 2:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yafang Shao @ 2025-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, jpoimboe, peterz
Cc: bpf, Yafang Shao
If we attach fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions, it will cause an
issue that the bpf trampoline image will be left over even if the bpf
link has been destroyed. Take attaching do_exit() with fexit for example.
The fexit works as follows,
bpf_trampoline
+ __bpf_tramp_enter
+ percpu_ref_get(&tr->pcref);
+ call do_exit()
+ __bpf_tramp_exit
+ percpu_ref_put(&tr->pcref);
Since do_exit() never returns, the refcnt of the trampoline image is
never decremented, preventing it from being freed. That can be verified
with as follows,
$ bpftool link show <<<< nothing output
$ grep "bpf_trampoline_[0-9]" /proc/kallsyms
ffffffffc04cb000 t bpf_trampoline_6442526459 [bpf] <<<< leftover
In this patch, all functions annotated with __noreturn are rejected, except
for the following cases:
- Functions that result in a system reboot, such as panic,
machine_real_restart and rust_begin_unwind
- Functions that are never executed by tasks, such as rest_init and
cpu_startup_entry
- Functions implemented in assembly, such as rewind_stack_and_make_dead and
xen_cpu_bringup_again, lack an associated BTF ID.
With this change, attaching fexit probes to functions like do_exit() will
be rejected.
$ ./fexit
libbpf: prog 'fexit': BPF program load failed: -EINVAL
libbpf: prog 'fexit': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
Attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions is rejected.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 3303a3605ee8..19ece8893d38 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -23215,6 +23215,33 @@ BTF_ID(func, __rcu_read_unlock)
#endif
BTF_SET_END(btf_id_deny)
+/* fexit and fmod_ret can't be used to attach to __noreturn functions.
+ * Currently, we must manually list all __noreturn functions here. Once a more
+ * robust solution is implemented, this workaround can be removed.
+ */
+BTF_SET_START(noreturn_deny)
+#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
+BTF_ID(func, __ia32_sys_exit)
+BTF_ID(func, __ia32_sys_exit_group)
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT
+BTF_ID(func, __kunit_abort)
+BTF_ID(func, kunit_try_catch_throw)
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
+BTF_ID(func, __module_put_and_kthread_exit)
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+BTF_ID(func, __x64_sys_exit)
+BTF_ID(func, __x64_sys_exit_group)
+#endif
+BTF_ID(func, do_exit)
+BTF_ID(func, do_group_exit)
+BTF_ID(func, kthread_complete_and_exit)
+BTF_ID(func, kthread_exit)
+BTF_ID(func, make_task_dead)
+BTF_SET_END(noreturn_deny)
+
static bool can_be_sleepable(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING) {
@@ -23301,6 +23328,11 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
} else if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
btf_id_set_contains(&btf_id_deny, btf_id)) {
return -EINVAL;
+ } else if ((prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_FEXIT ||
+ prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_MODIFY_RETURN) &&
+ btf_id_set_contains(&noreturn_deny, btf_id)) {
+ verbose(env, "Attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions is rejected.\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
}
key = bpf_trampoline_compute_key(tgt_prog, prog->aux->attach_btf, btf_id);
--
2.43.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit to __noreturn functions
2025-03-18 11:44 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions Yafang Shao
2025-03-18 11:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/2] " Yafang Shao
@ 2025-03-18 11:44 ` Yafang Shao
2025-03-19 2:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yafang Shao @ 2025-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, jpoimboe, peterz
Cc: bpf, Yafang Shao
The reuslt:
$ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=fexit_noreturns
#99/1 fexit_noreturns/noreturns:OK
#99 fexit_noreturns:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_noreturns.c | 9 +++++++++
.../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_noreturns.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_noreturns.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_noreturns.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_noreturns.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_noreturns.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..568d3aa48a78
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_noreturns.c
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "fexit_noreturns.skel.h"
+
+void test_fexit_noreturns(void)
+{
+ RUN_TESTS(fexit_noreturns);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_noreturns.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_noreturns.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..54654539f550
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_noreturns.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+SEC("fexit/do_exit")
+__failure __msg("Attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions is rejected.")
+int BPF_PROG(noreturns)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.43.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
2025-03-18 11:44 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions Yafang Shao
2025-03-18 11:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/2] " Yafang Shao
2025-03-18 11:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit " Yafang Shao
@ 2025-03-19 2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2025-03-19 2:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yafang Shao
Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, jpoimboe, peterz,
bpf
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:44:45 +0800 you wrote:
> Attaching fexit probes to functions marked with __noreturn may lead to
> unpredictable behavior. To avoid this, we will reject attaching probes to
> such functions. Currently, there is no ideal solution, so we will hardcode
> a check for all __noreturn functions.
>
> Once a more robust solution is implemented, this workaround can be removed.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v5,1/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/cfe816d469dc
- [bpf-next,v5,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit to __noreturn functions
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/be16ddeaae96
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread