BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
@ 2025-03-18 11:44 Yafang Shao
  2025-03-18 11:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/2] " Yafang Shao
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yafang Shao @ 2025-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
	john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, jpoimboe, peterz
  Cc: bpf, Yafang Shao

Attaching fexit probes to functions marked with __noreturn may lead to
unpredictable behavior. To avoid this, we will reject attaching probes to
such functions. Currently, there is no ideal solution, so we will hardcode
a check for all __noreturn functions.

Once a more robust solution is implemented, this workaround can be removed.

v4->v5:
- Remove unnecessary functions (Alexei)
- Use BTF_ID directly (Alexei)

v3->v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250317121735.86515-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com/
- Reject also fmod_ret (Alexei)
- Fix build warnings and remove unnecessary functions (Alexei)

v1->v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250223062735.3341-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com/
- keep tools/objtool/noreturns.h as is (Josh)
- Add noreturns.h to objtool/sync-check.sh (Josh)
- Add verbose for the reject and simplify the test case (Song)

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250211023359.1570-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com/

Yafang Shao (2):
  bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
  selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit to __noreturn
    functions

 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/prog_tests/fexit_noreturns.c          |  9 ++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_noreturns.c     | 15 +++++++++
 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_noreturns.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_noreturns.c

-- 
2.43.5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
  2025-03-18 11:44 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions Yafang Shao
@ 2025-03-18 11:44 ` Yafang Shao
  2025-03-18 11:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit " Yafang Shao
  2025-03-19  2:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yafang Shao @ 2025-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
	john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, jpoimboe, peterz
  Cc: bpf, Yafang Shao

If we attach fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions, it will cause an
issue that the bpf trampoline image will be left over even if the bpf
link has been destroyed. Take attaching do_exit() with fexit for example.
The fexit works as follows,

  bpf_trampoline
  + __bpf_tramp_enter
    + percpu_ref_get(&tr->pcref);

  + call do_exit()

  + __bpf_tramp_exit
    + percpu_ref_put(&tr->pcref);

Since do_exit() never returns, the refcnt of the trampoline image is
never decremented, preventing it from being freed. That can be verified
with as follows,

  $ bpftool link show                                   <<<< nothing output
  $ grep "bpf_trampoline_[0-9]" /proc/kallsyms
  ffffffffc04cb000 t bpf_trampoline_6442526459    [bpf] <<<< leftover

In this patch, all functions annotated with __noreturn are rejected, except
for the following cases:
- Functions that result in a system reboot, such as panic,
  machine_real_restart and rust_begin_unwind
- Functions that are never executed by tasks, such as rest_init and
  cpu_startup_entry
- Functions implemented in assembly, such as rewind_stack_and_make_dead and
  xen_cpu_bringup_again, lack an associated BTF ID.

With this change, attaching fexit probes to functions like do_exit() will
be rejected.

$ ./fexit
libbpf: prog 'fexit': BPF program load failed: -EINVAL
libbpf: prog 'fexit': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
Attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions is rejected.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 3303a3605ee8..19ece8893d38 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -23215,6 +23215,33 @@ BTF_ID(func, __rcu_read_unlock)
 #endif
 BTF_SET_END(btf_id_deny)
 
+/* fexit and fmod_ret can't be used to attach to __noreturn functions.
+ * Currently, we must manually list all __noreturn functions here. Once a more
+ * robust solution is implemented, this workaround can be removed.
+ */
+BTF_SET_START(noreturn_deny)
+#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
+BTF_ID(func, __ia32_sys_exit)
+BTF_ID(func, __ia32_sys_exit_group)
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT
+BTF_ID(func, __kunit_abort)
+BTF_ID(func, kunit_try_catch_throw)
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
+BTF_ID(func, __module_put_and_kthread_exit)
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+BTF_ID(func, __x64_sys_exit)
+BTF_ID(func, __x64_sys_exit_group)
+#endif
+BTF_ID(func, do_exit)
+BTF_ID(func, do_group_exit)
+BTF_ID(func, kthread_complete_and_exit)
+BTF_ID(func, kthread_exit)
+BTF_ID(func, make_task_dead)
+BTF_SET_END(noreturn_deny)
+
 static bool can_be_sleepable(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING) {
@@ -23301,6 +23328,11 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	} else if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
 		   btf_id_set_contains(&btf_id_deny, btf_id)) {
 		return -EINVAL;
+	} else if ((prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_FEXIT ||
+		   prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_MODIFY_RETURN) &&
+		   btf_id_set_contains(&noreturn_deny, btf_id)) {
+		verbose(env, "Attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions is rejected.\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	key = bpf_trampoline_compute_key(tgt_prog, prog->aux->attach_btf, btf_id);
-- 
2.43.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit to __noreturn functions
  2025-03-18 11:44 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions Yafang Shao
  2025-03-18 11:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/2] " Yafang Shao
@ 2025-03-18 11:44 ` Yafang Shao
  2025-03-19  2:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yafang Shao @ 2025-03-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
	john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, jpoimboe, peterz
  Cc: bpf, Yafang Shao

The reuslt:

  $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=fexit_noreturns
  #99/1    fexit_noreturns/noreturns:OK
  #99      fexit_noreturns:OK
  Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_noreturns.c    |  9 +++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_noreturns.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_noreturns.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_noreturns.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_noreturns.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_noreturns.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..568d3aa48a78
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_noreturns.c
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "fexit_noreturns.skel.h"
+
+void test_fexit_noreturns(void)
+{
+	RUN_TESTS(fexit_noreturns);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_noreturns.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_noreturns.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..54654539f550
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_noreturns.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+SEC("fexit/do_exit")
+__failure __msg("Attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions is rejected.")
+int BPF_PROG(noreturns)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.43.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
  2025-03-18 11:44 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions Yafang Shao
  2025-03-18 11:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/2] " Yafang Shao
  2025-03-18 11:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit " Yafang Shao
@ 2025-03-19  2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2025-03-19  2:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yafang Shao
  Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song,
	john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, jpoimboe, peterz,
	bpf

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:44:45 +0800 you wrote:
> Attaching fexit probes to functions marked with __noreturn may lead to
> unpredictable behavior. To avoid this, we will reject attaching probes to
> such functions. Currently, there is no ideal solution, so we will hardcode
> a check for all __noreturn functions.
> 
> Once a more robust solution is implemented, this workaround can be removed.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v5,1/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/cfe816d469dc
  - [bpf-next,v5,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit to __noreturn functions
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/be16ddeaae96

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-19  2:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-18 11:44 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions Yafang Shao
2025-03-18 11:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/2] " Yafang Shao
2025-03-18 11:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for attaching fexit " Yafang Shao
2025-03-19  2:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/2] bpf: Reject attaching fexit/fmod_ret " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox