* [PATCH bpf-next,v2] bpf: clarify BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP behavior for bpf_ringbuf_discard()
@ 2026-03-31 13:06 Eyal Birger
2026-03-31 22:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eyal Birger @ 2026-03-31 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, memxor, song,
yonghong.song, jolsa, paul.chaignon, chen.dylane, kpsingh,
a.s.protopopov, yatsenko, ameryhung, tklauser, shmulik.ladkani,
puranjay
Cc: bpf, linux-kernel, Eyal Birger
Clarify bpf_ringbuf_discard() documentation for BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP.
Discarded ring buffer records are still left in the ring buffer and are
only skipped when user space consumes them. This can matter when
BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP is used: a later submit relying on adaptive wakeup
might not wake the consumer, because the discarded record still needs to
be consumed first.
Scenario:
epoll_wait(rb_fd); // blocks
rec = bpf_ringbuf_reserve(&rb, ...);
bpf_ringbuf_discard(rec, BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP);
rec = bpf_ringbuf_reserve(&rb, ...);
bpf_ringbuf_submit(rec, 0); // valid record, but no wakeup
Document this in bpf_ringbuf_discard() to make the interaction between
discarded records, user-space consumption, and adaptive wakeups explicit.
Reported-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com>
----
v2: adapt wording per feedback from Andrii.
---
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 4 +++-
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index c8d400b7680a..552bc5d9afbd 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -4645,7 +4645,9 @@ union bpf_attr {
* Description
* Discard reserved ring buffer sample, pointed to by *data*.
* If **BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, no notification
- * of new data availability is sent.
+ * of new data availability is sent. Discarded records remain in
+ * the ring buffer until consumed by user space, so a later submit
+ * using adaptive wakeup might not wake up the consumer.
* If **BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, notification
* of new data availability is sent unconditionally.
* If **0** is specified in *flags*, an adaptive notification
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 5e38b4887de6..677be9a47347 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -4645,7 +4645,9 @@ union bpf_attr {
* Description
* Discard reserved ring buffer sample, pointed to by *data*.
* If **BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, no notification
- * of new data availability is sent.
+ * of new data availability is sent. Discarded records remain in
+ * the ring buffer until consumed by user space, so a later submit
+ * using adaptive wakeup might not wake up the consumer.
* If **BPF_RB_FORCE_WAKEUP** is specified in *flags*, notification
* of new data availability is sent unconditionally.
* If **0** is specified in *flags*, an adaptive notification
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next,v2] bpf: clarify BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP behavior for bpf_ringbuf_discard()
2026-03-31 13:06 [PATCH bpf-next,v2] bpf: clarify BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP behavior for bpf_ringbuf_discard() Eyal Birger
@ 2026-03-31 22:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-03-31 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eyal Birger
Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, memxor, song,
yonghong.song, jolsa, paul.chaignon, chen.dylane, kpsingh,
a.s.protopopov, yatsenko, ameryhung, tklauser, shmulik.ladkani,
puranjay, bpf, linux-kernel
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 06:06:12 -0700 you wrote:
> Clarify bpf_ringbuf_discard() documentation for BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP.
>
> Discarded ring buffer records are still left in the ring buffer and are
> only skipped when user space consumes them. This can matter when
> BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP is used: a later submit relying on adaptive wakeup
> might not wake the consumer, because the discarded record still needs to
> be consumed first.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v2] bpf: clarify BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP behavior for bpf_ringbuf_discard()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f9a80c7ce49e
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-31 22:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-31 13:06 [PATCH bpf-next,v2] bpf: clarify BPF_RB_NO_WAKEUP behavior for bpf_ringbuf_discard() Eyal Birger
2026-03-31 22:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox