BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "bpf@ietf.org" <bpf@ietf.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bpf] IETF BPF working group draft charter
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 13:58:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18272.1684864698@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523163200.GD20100@maniforge>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 620 bytes --]


David Vernet <void@manifault.com> wrote:
    > As far as I know (please correct me if I'm wrong), there isn't really a
    > precedence for standardizing ABIs like this. For example, x86 calling

All of the eBPF work seems unprecedented.
I don't see having this in the charter is a problem.

We may fail to get consensus on it, and not make a milestone, but I don't see
a reason not to be allowed to talk about this.
(and maybe in the end, it's a no-op)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide





[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 515 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 76 bytes --]

-- 
Bpf mailing list
Bpf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "bpf@ietf.org" <bpf@ietf.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bpf] IETF BPF working group draft charter
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 13:58:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18272.1684864698@localhost> (raw)
Message-ID: <20230523175818.YuMChSUZplPhtuYFn1PVm_n3a6_5lsRunUDOirjgQY8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523163200.GD20100@maniforge>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 620 bytes --]


David Vernet <void@manifault.com> wrote:
    > As far as I know (please correct me if I'm wrong), there isn't really a
    > precedence for standardizing ABIs like this. For example, x86 calling

All of the eBPF work seems unprecedented.
I don't see having this in the charter is a problem.

We may fail to get consensus on it, and not make a milestone, but I don't see
a reason not to be allowed to talk about this.
(and maybe in the end, it's a no-op)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide





[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 515 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-23 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <PH7PR21MB38780769D482CC5F83768D3CA37E9@PH7PR21MB3878.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
     [not found] ` <87v8grkn67.fsf@gnu.org>
2023-05-17 18:19   ` [Bpf] IETF BPF working group draft charter Dave Thaler
2023-05-17 18:19     ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-17 21:00     ` David Vernet
2023-05-17 21:00       ` David Vernet
2023-05-17 21:13       ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-17 21:13         ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-18 17:33     ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-05-18 17:33       ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-05-18 19:42       ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-18 19:42         ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-23 16:32         ` David Vernet
2023-05-23 16:32           ` David Vernet
2023-05-23 16:50           ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-23 16:50             ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-23 17:15             ` David Vernet
2023-05-23 17:15               ` David Vernet
2023-05-23 19:08               ` David Vernet
2023-05-23 19:08                 ` David Vernet
2023-05-23 19:42                 ` Erik Kline
2023-05-23 19:42                   ` Erik Kline
2023-05-23 19:47                   ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-05-23 19:47                     ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-05-23 17:58           ` Michael Richardson [this message]
2023-05-23 17:58             ` Michael Richardson
2023-05-23 18:25             ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-23 18:25               ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-23 20:28             ` David Vernet
2023-05-23 20:28               ` David Vernet
2023-05-24 20:38               ` Suresh Krishnan
2023-05-24 21:06                 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-05-24 21:06                   ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-05-26 16:05                   ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-26 16:05                     ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-26 17:25                     ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-05-26 17:25                       ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-05-25  7:44               ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-25  7:44                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-25 10:14                 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-05-25 10:14                   ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-05-26 16:02                   ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-26 16:02                     ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-26 16:55                     ` David Vernet
2023-05-26 16:55                       ` David Vernet
2023-05-26 17:01                       ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-26 17:01                         ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-26 17:19                         ` David Vernet
2023-05-26 17:19                           ` David Vernet
2023-05-26 17:30                           ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-26 17:30                             ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-31  3:48                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31  3:48                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31 19:38                               ` Michael Richardson
2023-05-31 19:38                                 ` Michael Richardson
2023-05-31 19:44                                 ` Dave Thaler
2023-05-31 19:44                                   ` Dave Thaler
2023-06-01 17:40                                   ` Michael Richardson
2023-06-01 17:40                                     ` Michael Richardson
2023-05-31  3:47                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31  3:47                           ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18272.1684864698@localhost \
    --to=mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca \
    --cc=bpf@ietf.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox