BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: add verifier tests for xor operation
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:46:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200825064609.2018077-1-yhs@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200825064608.2017878-1-yhs@fb.com>

Added some test_verifier bounds check test cases for
xor operations.
  $ ./test_verifier
  ...
  #78/u bounds check for reg = 0, reg xor 1 OK
  #78/p bounds check for reg = 0, reg xor 1 OK
  #79/u bounds check for reg32 = 0, reg32 xor 1 OK
  #79/p bounds check for reg32 = 0, reg32 xor 1 OK
  #80/u bounds check for reg = 2, reg xor 3 OK
  #80/p bounds check for reg = 2, reg xor 3 OK
  #81/u bounds check for reg = any, reg xor 3 OK
  #81/p bounds check for reg = any, reg xor 3 OK
  #82/u bounds check for reg32 = any, reg32 xor 3 OK
  #82/p bounds check for reg32 = any, reg32 xor 3 OK
  #83/u bounds check for reg > 0, reg xor 3 OK
  #83/p bounds check for reg > 0, reg xor 3 OK
  #84/u bounds check for reg32 > 0, reg32 xor 3 OK
  #84/p bounds check for reg32 > 0, reg32 xor 3 OK
  ...

Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 146 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
index 4d6645f2874c..dac40de3f868 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
@@ -557,3 +557,149 @@
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 },
+{
+	"bounds check for reg = 0, reg xor 1",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+},
+{
+	"bounds check for reg32 = 0, reg32 xor 1",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+	BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+},
+{
+	"bounds check for reg = 2, reg xor 3",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 2),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_1, 3),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+},
+{
+	"bounds check for reg = any, reg xor 3",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_1, 3),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "invalid access to map value",
+	.errstr_unpriv = "invalid access to map value",
+},
+{
+	"bounds check for reg32 = any, reg32 xor 3",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_1, 3),
+	BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "invalid access to map value",
+	.errstr_unpriv = "invalid access to map value",
+},
+{
+	"bounds check for reg > 0, reg xor 3",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 3),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_1, 3),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+},
+{
+	"bounds check for reg32 > 0, reg32 xor 3",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 3),
+	BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_1, 3),
+	BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 },
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+},
-- 
2.24.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-25  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-25  6:46 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] fix a verifier failure with xor Yonghong Song
2020-08-25  6:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: " Yonghong Song
2020-08-26  1:58   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-08-26  3:36     ` Yonghong Song
2020-08-26 22:06       ` John Fastabend
2020-08-27  5:12         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-08-27 18:43           ` John Fastabend
2020-09-01 20:07   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-09-02  2:17     ` Yonghong Song
2020-09-02  5:27       ` John Fastabend
2020-09-02  5:43         ` Yonghong Song
2020-09-04  5:29           ` John Fastabend
2020-09-02  9:33       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-02 14:21         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-09-02 15:01           ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-09-02 21:40             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-08-25  6:46 ` Yonghong Song [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200825064609.2018077-1-yhs@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox