* [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: selftests: remove shared header from sockmap iter test
@ 2020-09-11 9:14 Lorenz Bauer
2020-09-11 16:16 ` Yonghong Song
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lorenz Bauer @ 2020-09-11 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast, daniel; +Cc: bpf, kernel-team, Lorenz Bauer, Yonghong Song
The shared header to define SOCKMAP_MAX_ENTRIES is a bit overkill.
Dynamically allocate the sock_fd array based on bpf_map__max_entries
instead.
Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c | 39 ++++++++++---------
.../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.c | 5 +--
.../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h | 3 --
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
index 4b7a527e7e82..2672a91cd78f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
@@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
#include "test_sockmap_invalid_update.skel.h"
#include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h"
-#include "progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h"
-
#define TCP_REPAIR 19 /* TCP sock is under repair right now */
#define TCP_REPAIR_ON 1
@@ -179,9 +177,9 @@ static void test_sockmap_iter(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
int err, len, src_fd, iter_fd, duration = 0;
union bpf_iter_link_info linfo = {0};
- __s64 sock_fd[SOCKMAP_MAX_ENTRIES];
- __u32 i, num_sockets, max_elems;
+ __u32 i, num_sockets, num_elems;
struct bpf_iter_sockmap *skel;
+ __s64 *sock_fd = NULL;
struct bpf_link *link;
struct bpf_map *src;
char buf[64];
@@ -190,22 +188,26 @@ static void test_sockmap_iter(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
if (CHECK(!skel, "bpf_iter_sockmap__open_and_load", "skeleton open_and_load failed\n"))
return;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sock_fd); i++)
- sock_fd[i] = -1;
-
- /* Make sure we have at least one "empty" entry to test iteration of
- * an empty slot.
- */
- num_sockets = ARRAY_SIZE(sock_fd) - 1;
-
if (map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP) {
src = skel->maps.sockmap;
- max_elems = bpf_map__max_entries(src);
+ num_elems = bpf_map__max_entries(src);
} else {
src = skel->maps.sockhash;
- max_elems = num_sockets;
+ num_elems = bpf_map__max_entries(src) - 1;
}
+ /* Make sure we have at least one "empty" entry to test iteration of
+ * an empty slot.
+ */
+ num_sockets = bpf_map__max_entries(src) - 1;
+
+ sock_fd = calloc(num_sockets, sizeof(*sock_fd));
+ if (CHECK(!sock_fd, "calloc(sock_fd)", "failed to allocate\n"))
+ goto out;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_sockets; i++)
+ sock_fd[i] = -1;
+
src_fd = bpf_map__fd(src);
for (i = 0; i < num_sockets; i++) {
@@ -236,8 +238,8 @@ static void test_sockmap_iter(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
goto close_iter;
/* test results */
- if (CHECK(skel->bss->elems != max_elems, "elems", "got %u expected %u\n",
- skel->bss->elems, max_elems))
+ if (CHECK(skel->bss->elems != num_elems, "elems", "got %u expected %u\n",
+ skel->bss->elems, num_elems))
goto close_iter;
if (CHECK(skel->bss->socks != num_sockets, "socks", "got %u expected %u\n",
@@ -249,10 +251,11 @@ static void test_sockmap_iter(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
free_link:
bpf_link__destroy(link);
out:
- for (i = 0; i < num_sockets; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; sock_fd && i < num_sockets; i++)
if (sock_fd[i] >= 0)
close(sock_fd[i]);
- }
+ if (sock_fd)
+ free(sock_fd);
bpf_iter_sockmap__destroy(skel);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.c
index 0e27f73dd803..1af7555f6057 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.c
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
/* Copyright (c) 2020 Cloudflare */
#include "bpf_iter.h"
#include "bpf_tracing_net.h"
-#include "bpf_iter_sockmap.h"
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
#include <errno.h>
@@ -11,14 +10,14 @@ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP);
- __uint(max_entries, SOCKMAP_MAX_ENTRIES);
+ __uint(max_entries, 64);
__type(key, __u32);
__type(value, __u64);
} sockmap SEC(".maps");
struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKHASH);
- __uint(max_entries, SOCKMAP_MAX_ENTRIES);
+ __uint(max_entries, 64);
__type(key, __u32);
__type(value, __u64);
} sockhash SEC(".maps");
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 35a675d13c0f..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
-
-#define SOCKMAP_MAX_ENTRIES (64)
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: selftests: remove shared header from sockmap iter test
2020-09-11 9:14 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: selftests: remove shared header from sockmap iter test Lorenz Bauer
@ 2020-09-11 16:16 ` Yonghong Song
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2020-09-11 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lorenz Bauer, ast, daniel; +Cc: bpf, kernel-team
On 9/11/20 2:14 AM, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> The shared header to define SOCKMAP_MAX_ENTRIES is a bit overkill.
> Dynamically allocate the sock_fd array based on bpf_map__max_entries
> instead.
>
> Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Ack with some nits below.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c | 39 ++++++++++---------
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.c | 5 +--
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h | 3 --
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> index 4b7a527e7e82..2672a91cd78f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
> #include "test_sockmap_invalid_update.skel.h"
> #include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h"
>
> -#include "progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h"
> -
> #define TCP_REPAIR 19 /* TCP sock is under repair right now */
>
> #define TCP_REPAIR_ON 1
> @@ -179,9 +177,9 @@ static void test_sockmap_iter(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
> DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
> int err, len, src_fd, iter_fd, duration = 0;
> union bpf_iter_link_info linfo = {0};
> - __s64 sock_fd[SOCKMAP_MAX_ENTRIES];
> - __u32 i, num_sockets, max_elems;
> + __u32 i, num_sockets, num_elems;
> struct bpf_iter_sockmap *skel;
> + __s64 *sock_fd = NULL;
> struct bpf_link *link;
> struct bpf_map *src;
> char buf[64];
> @@ -190,22 +188,26 @@ static void test_sockmap_iter(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
> if (CHECK(!skel, "bpf_iter_sockmap__open_and_load", "skeleton open_and_load failed\n"))
> return;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sock_fd); i++)
> - sock_fd[i] = -1;
> -
> - /* Make sure we have at least one "empty" entry to test iteration of
> - * an empty slot.
> - */
> - num_sockets = ARRAY_SIZE(sock_fd) - 1;
> -
> if (map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP) {
> src = skel->maps.sockmap;
> - max_elems = bpf_map__max_entries(src);
> + num_elems = bpf_map__max_entries(src);
> } else {
> src = skel->maps.sockhash;
> - max_elems = num_sockets;
> + num_elems = bpf_map__max_entries(src) - 1;
> }
>
> + /* Make sure we have at least one "empty" entry to test iteration of
> + * an empty slot.
> + */
> + num_sockets = bpf_map__max_entries(src) - 1;
I found the logic above a little bit confusing in the sense you want
num_elems and num_sockets the same for sockhash but from code they are
assigned both from bpf_map__max_entries(src) - 1. Maybe the following
more clear?
/* Make sure we have at least one "empty" entry to test
* iteration of an empty slot.
*/
if (map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP) {
src = skel->maps.sockmap;
num_elems = bpf_map__max_entries(src);
num_sockets = num_elems - 1;
} else {
src = skel->maps.sockhash;
num_sockets = bpf_map__max_entries(src) - 1;
num_elems = num_sockets;
}
> +
> + sock_fd = calloc(num_sockets, sizeof(*sock_fd));
> + if (CHECK(!sock_fd, "calloc(sock_fd)", "failed to allocate\n"))
> + goto out;
calloc will initialize the value to 0, but it is overwritten below
with -1. malloc is sufficient here.
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_sockets; i++)
> + sock_fd[i] = -1;
> +
> src_fd = bpf_map__fd(src);
>
> for (i = 0; i < num_sockets; i++) {
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-11 16:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-11 9:14 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: selftests: remove shared header from sockmap iter test Lorenz Bauer
2020-09-11 16:16 ` Yonghong Song
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox