BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lina Wang <lina.wang@mediatek.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	<maze@google.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Lina Wang <lina.wang@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] net: fix wrong network header length
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 15:30:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220216073055.22642-1-lina.wang@mediatek.com> (raw)

When clatd starts with ebpf offloaing, and NETIF_F_GRO_FRAGLIST is enable,
several skbs are gathered in skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list. The first skb's
ipv6 header will be changed to ipv4 after bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4,
network_header\transport_header\mac_header have been updated as ipv4 acts,
but other skbs in frag_list didnot update anything, just ipv6 packets.

udp_queue_rcv_skb will call skb_segment_list to traverse other skbs in
frag_list and make sure right udp payload is delivered to user space.
Unfortunately, other skbs in frag_list who are still ipv6 packets are
updated like the first skb and will have wrong transport header length.

e.g.before bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4,the first skb and other skbs in frag_list
has the same network_header(24)& transport_header(64), after
bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4, ipv6 protocol has been changed to ipv4, the first
skb's network_header is 44,transport_header is 64, other skbs in frag_list
didnot change.After skb_segment_list, the other skbs in frag_list has
different network_header(24) and transport_header(44), so there will be 20
bytes different from original,that is difference between ipv6 header and 
ipv4 header. Just change transport_header to be the same with original.

Actually, there are two solutions to fix it, one is traversing all skbs
and changing every skb header in bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4, the other is
modifying frag_list skb's header in skb_segment_list. Considering
efficiency, adopt the second one--- when the first skb and other skbs in
frag_list has different network_header length, restore them to make sure
right udp payload is delivered to user space.

Signed-off-by: Lina Wang <lina.wang@mediatek.com>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 0118f0afaa4f..f5ea977d8f24 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -3865,7 +3865,7 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	unsigned int delta_len = 0;
 	struct sk_buff *tail = NULL;
 	struct sk_buff *nskb, *tmp;
-	int err;
+	int len_diff, err;
 
 	skb_push(skb, -skb_network_offset(skb) + offset);
 
@@ -3905,9 +3905,11 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
 		skb_push(nskb, -skb_network_offset(nskb) + offset);
 
 		skb_release_head_state(nskb);
+		len_diff = skb_network_header_len(nskb) - skb_network_header_len(skb);
 		__copy_skb_header(nskb, skb);
 
 		skb_headers_offset_update(nskb, skb_headroom(nskb) - skb_headroom(skb));
+		nskb->transport_header += len_diff;
 		skb_copy_from_linear_data_offset(skb, -tnl_hlen,
 						 nskb->data - tnl_hlen,
 						 offset + tnl_hlen);
-- 
2.18.0


             reply	other threads:[~2022-02-16  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-16  7:30 Lina Wang [this message]
2022-02-17  3:05 ` [PATCH v3] net: fix wrong network header length Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-17  7:01   ` Lina Wang
2022-02-17  8:45     ` Paolo Abeni
2022-02-17 17:05       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-18  2:23         ` Lina Wang
2022-04-07  9:38         ` Lina Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220216073055.22642-1-lina.wang@mediatek.com \
    --to=lina.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=maze@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox