BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/6] bpf: Harden register offset checks for release kfunc
Date: Tue,  1 Mar 2022 12:27:43 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220301065745.1634848-5-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220301065745.1634848-1-memxor@gmail.com>

Let's ensure that the PTR_TO_BTF_ID reg being passed in to release kfunc
always has its offset set to 0. While not a real problem now, there's a
very real possibility this will become a problem when more and more
kfuncs are exposed.

Previous commits already protected against non-zero var_off. The case we
are concerned about now is when we have a type that can be returned by
acquire kfunc:

struct foo {
	int a;
	int b;
	struct bar b;
};

... and struct bar is also a type that can be returned by another
acquire kfunc.

Then, doing the following sequence:

	struct foo *f = bpf_get_foo(); // acquire kfunc
	if (!f)
		return 0;
	bpf_put_bar(&f->b); // release kfunc

... would work with the current code, since the btf_struct_ids_match
takes reg->off into account for matching pointer type with release kfunc
argument type, but would obviously be incorrect, and most likely lead to
a kernel crash. A test has been included later to prevent regressions in
this area.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 7f6a0ae5028b..ba6845225b65 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -5753,6 +5753,9 @@ static int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	if (is_kfunc)
+		rel = btf_kfunc_id_set_contains(btf, resolve_prog_type(env->prog),
+						BTF_KFUNC_TYPE_RELEASE, func_id);
 	/* check that BTF function arguments match actual types that the
 	 * verifier sees.
 	 */
@@ -5816,6 +5819,16 @@ static int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 							regno, reg->ref_obj_id, ref_obj_id);
 						return -EFAULT;
 					}
+					/* Ensure that offset of referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID is
+					 * always zero, when passed to release function.
+					 * var_off has already been checked to be 0 by
+					 * check_func_arg_reg_off.
+					 */
+					if (rel && reg->off) {
+						bpf_log(log, "R%d with ref_obj_id=%d must have zero offset when passed to release kfunc\n",
+							regno, reg->ref_obj_id);
+						return -EINVAL;
+					}
 					ref_regno = regno;
 					ref_obj_id = reg->ref_obj_id;
 				}
@@ -5892,8 +5905,6 @@ static int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	/* Either both are set, or neither */
 	WARN_ON_ONCE((ref_obj_id && !ref_regno) || (!ref_obj_id && ref_regno));
 	if (is_kfunc) {
-		rel = btf_kfunc_id_set_contains(btf, resolve_prog_type(env->prog),
-						BTF_KFUNC_TYPE_RELEASE, func_id);
 		/* We already made sure ref_obj_id is set only for one argument */
 		if (rel && !ref_obj_id) {
 			bpf_log(log, "release kernel function %s expects refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID\n",
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-01  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-01  6:57 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/6] Fixes for bad PTR_TO_BTF_ID offset Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-01  6:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/6] bpf: Add check_func_arg_reg_off function Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-01  6:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/6] bpf: Fix PTR_TO_BTF_ID var_off check Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-01  6:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/6] bpf: Disallow negative offset in check_ptr_off_reg Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-01  6:57 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2022-03-02  3:20   ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/6] bpf: Harden register offset checks for release kfunc Martin KaFai Lau
2022-03-02  9:42     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-02 21:56       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-03-02 22:30         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-02 22:44           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-02 23:00             ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-02 23:17               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-02 23:29                 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-02 23:39                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-02 23:31             ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-03-01  6:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/6] selftests/bpf: Update tests for new errstr Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-02 22:45   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-02 23:02     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-01  6:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add tests for kfunc register offset checks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-01 11:40   ` kernel test robot
2022-03-01 11:57     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-02 22:47       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-02 23:14         ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-02 23:20           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-02 23:26           ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-03-02 23:37             ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220301065745.1634848-5-memxor@gmail.com \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox