* [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/2] selftests/bpf: fix ima_setup.sh missing issue
@ 2022-05-13 1:01 Hangbin Liu
2022-05-13 1:01 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix build error with ima_setup.sh Hangbin Liu
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hangbin Liu @ 2022-05-13 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: Shuah Khan, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Ilya Leoshkevich, linux-kselftest, bpf, Hangbin Liu
The ima_setup.sh is needed by test_progs test_ima. But the file is
missed if we build test_progs separately or installed bpf test to
another folder. This patch set fixed the issue in 2 different
scenarios.
v2: no code update, just repost to bpf-next
Hangbin Liu (2):
selftests/bpf: Fix build error with ima_setup.sh
selftests/bpf: add missed ima_setup.sh in Makefile
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix build error with ima_setup.sh
2022-05-13 1:01 [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/2] selftests/bpf: fix ima_setup.sh missing issue Hangbin Liu
@ 2022-05-13 1:01 ` Hangbin Liu
2022-05-13 21:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-13 1:01 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: add missed ima_setup.sh in Makefile Hangbin Liu
2022-05-13 14:46 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/2] selftests/bpf: fix ima_setup.sh missing issue Daniel Borkmann
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hangbin Liu @ 2022-05-13 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: Shuah Khan, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Ilya Leoshkevich, linux-kselftest, bpf, Hangbin Liu
KP fixed ima_setup.sh missing issue when build test_progs separately with
commit 854055c0cf30 ("selftests/bpf: Fix flavored variants of
test_ima"). But the fix is incorrect because the build will failed with
error:
$ OUTPUT="/tmp/bpf" make test_progs
[...]
make: *** No rule to make target '/tmp/bpf/ima_setup.sh', needed by 'ima_setup.sh'. Stop.
Fix it by adding a new variable TRUNNER_EXTRA_BUILD to build extra binaries.
Left TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES only for copying files
Fixes: 854055c0cf30 ("selftests/bpf: Fix flavored variants of test_ima")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index 3820608faf57..5944d3a8fff6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -466,10 +466,10 @@ $(TRUNNER_EXTRA_OBJS): $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)/%.o: \
# non-flavored in-srctree builds receive special treatment, in particular, we
# do not need to copy extra resources (see e.g. test_btf_dump_case())
-$(TRUNNER_BINARY)-extras: $(TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES) | $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)
+$(TRUNNER_BINARY)-extras: $(TRUNNER_EXTRA_BUILD) | $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)
ifneq ($2:$(OUTPUT),:$(shell pwd))
$$(call msg,EXT-COPY,$(TRUNNER_BINARY),$(TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES))
- $(Q)rsync -aq $$^ $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)/
+ $(Q)rsync -aq $(TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES) $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)/
endif
$(OUTPUT)/$(TRUNNER_BINARY): $(TRUNNER_TEST_OBJS) \
@@ -490,9 +490,9 @@ TRUNNER_EXTRA_SOURCES := test_progs.c cgroup_helpers.c trace_helpers.c \
network_helpers.c testing_helpers.c \
btf_helpers.c flow_dissector_load.h \
cap_helpers.c
-TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES := $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read $(OUTPUT)/bpf_testmod.ko \
- ima_setup.sh \
+TRUNNER_EXTRA_BUILD := $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read $(OUTPUT)/bpf_testmod.ko \
$(wildcard progs/btf_dump_test_case_*.c)
+TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES := $(TRUNNER_EXTRA_BUILD) ima_setup.sh
TRUNNER_BPF_BUILD_RULE := CLANG_BPF_BUILD_RULE
TRUNNER_BPF_CFLAGS := $(BPF_CFLAGS) $(CLANG_CFLAGS) -DENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS
$(eval $(call DEFINE_TEST_RUNNER,test_progs))
@@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ endif
TRUNNER_TESTS_DIR := map_tests
TRUNNER_BPF_PROGS_DIR := progs
TRUNNER_EXTRA_SOURCES := test_maps.c
+TRUNNER_EXTRA_BUILD :=
TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES :=
TRUNNER_BPF_BUILD_RULE := $$(error no BPF objects should be built)
TRUNNER_BPF_CFLAGS :=
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: add missed ima_setup.sh in Makefile
2022-05-13 1:01 [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/2] selftests/bpf: fix ima_setup.sh missing issue Hangbin Liu
2022-05-13 1:01 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix build error with ima_setup.sh Hangbin Liu
@ 2022-05-13 1:01 ` Hangbin Liu
2022-05-13 14:46 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/2] selftests/bpf: fix ima_setup.sh missing issue Daniel Borkmann
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hangbin Liu @ 2022-05-13 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: Shuah Khan, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Ilya Leoshkevich, linux-kselftest, bpf, Hangbin Liu
When build bpf test and install it to another folder, e.g.
make -j10 install -C tools/testing/selftests/ TARGETS="bpf" \
SKIP_TARGETS="" INSTALL_PATH=/tmp/kselftests
The ima_setup.sh is missed in target folder, which makes test_ima failed.
Fix it by adding ima_setup.sh to TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED.
Fixes: 34b82d3ac105 ("bpf: Add a selftest for bpf_ima_inode_hash")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index 5944d3a8fff6..b4fd1352a2ac 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ TEST_PROGS := test_kmod.sh \
test_xsk.sh
TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := with_addr.sh \
- with_tunnels.sh \
+ with_tunnels.sh ima_setup.sh \
test_xdp_vlan.sh test_bpftool.py
# Compile but not part of 'make run_tests'
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/2] selftests/bpf: fix ima_setup.sh missing issue
2022-05-13 1:01 [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/2] selftests/bpf: fix ima_setup.sh missing issue Hangbin Liu
2022-05-13 1:01 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix build error with ima_setup.sh Hangbin Liu
2022-05-13 1:01 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: add missed ima_setup.sh in Makefile Hangbin Liu
@ 2022-05-13 14:46 ` Daniel Borkmann
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2022-05-13 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hangbin Liu, netdev
Cc: Shuah Khan, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau,
Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh,
Ilya Leoshkevich, linux-kselftest, bpf
On 5/13/22 3:01 AM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> The ima_setup.sh is needed by test_progs test_ima. But the file is
> missed if we build test_progs separately or installed bpf test to
> another folder. This patch set fixed the issue in 2 different
> scenarios.
>
> v2: no code update, just repost to bpf-next
Is this against an old tree? This doesn't apply to bpf-next, fwiw, please
rebase your series.
> Hangbin Liu (2):
> selftests/bpf: Fix build error with ima_setup.sh
> selftests/bpf: add missed ima_setup.sh in Makefile
>
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Thanks,
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix build error with ima_setup.sh
2022-05-13 1:01 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix build error with ima_setup.sh Hangbin Liu
@ 2022-05-13 21:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2022-05-13 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hangbin Liu
Cc: Networking, Shuah Khan, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
John Fastabend, KP Singh, Ilya Leoshkevich,
open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, bpf
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 6:01 PM Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> KP fixed ima_setup.sh missing issue when build test_progs separately with
> commit 854055c0cf30 ("selftests/bpf: Fix flavored variants of
> test_ima"). But the fix is incorrect because the build will failed with
> error:
>
> $ OUTPUT="/tmp/bpf" make test_progs
> [...]
> make: *** No rule to make target '/tmp/bpf/ima_setup.sh', needed by 'ima_setup.sh'. Stop.
>
> Fix it by adding a new variable TRUNNER_EXTRA_BUILD to build extra binaries.
> Left TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES only for copying files
>
> Fixes: 854055c0cf30 ("selftests/bpf: Fix flavored variants of test_ima")
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
> ---
Oops, replied on older version of patch, but my comments still stand.
Not sure how this is actually fixing anything, tbh.
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> index 3820608faf57..5944d3a8fff6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -466,10 +466,10 @@ $(TRUNNER_EXTRA_OBJS): $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)/%.o: \
>
> # non-flavored in-srctree builds receive special treatment, in particular, we
> # do not need to copy extra resources (see e.g. test_btf_dump_case())
> -$(TRUNNER_BINARY)-extras: $(TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES) | $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)
> +$(TRUNNER_BINARY)-extras: $(TRUNNER_EXTRA_BUILD) | $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)
> ifneq ($2:$(OUTPUT),:$(shell pwd))
> $$(call msg,EXT-COPY,$(TRUNNER_BINARY),$(TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES))
> - $(Q)rsync -aq $$^ $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)/
> + $(Q)rsync -aq $(TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES) $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)/
> endif
>
> $(OUTPUT)/$(TRUNNER_BINARY): $(TRUNNER_TEST_OBJS) \
> @@ -490,9 +490,9 @@ TRUNNER_EXTRA_SOURCES := test_progs.c cgroup_helpers.c trace_helpers.c \
> network_helpers.c testing_helpers.c \
> btf_helpers.c flow_dissector_load.h \
> cap_helpers.c
> -TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES := $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read $(OUTPUT)/bpf_testmod.ko \
> - ima_setup.sh \
> +TRUNNER_EXTRA_BUILD := $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read $(OUTPUT)/bpf_testmod.ko \
> $(wildcard progs/btf_dump_test_case_*.c)
> +TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES := $(TRUNNER_EXTRA_BUILD) ima_setup.sh
> TRUNNER_BPF_BUILD_RULE := CLANG_BPF_BUILD_RULE
> TRUNNER_BPF_CFLAGS := $(BPF_CFLAGS) $(CLANG_CFLAGS) -DENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS
> $(eval $(call DEFINE_TEST_RUNNER,test_progs))
> @@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ endif
> TRUNNER_TESTS_DIR := map_tests
> TRUNNER_BPF_PROGS_DIR := progs
> TRUNNER_EXTRA_SOURCES := test_maps.c
> +TRUNNER_EXTRA_BUILD :=
> TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES :=
> TRUNNER_BPF_BUILD_RULE := $$(error no BPF objects should be built)
> TRUNNER_BPF_CFLAGS :=
> --
> 2.35.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-13 21:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-13 1:01 [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/2] selftests/bpf: fix ima_setup.sh missing issue Hangbin Liu
2022-05-13 1:01 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/2] selftests/bpf: Fix build error with ima_setup.sh Hangbin Liu
2022-05-13 21:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-13 1:01 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: add missed ima_setup.sh in Makefile Hangbin Liu
2022-05-13 14:46 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/2] selftests/bpf: fix ima_setup.sh missing issue Daniel Borkmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox