BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/11] bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF_LSM_CGROUP
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 15:55:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220518225531.558008-6-sdf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220518225531.558008-1-sdf@google.com>

We have two options:
1. Treat all BPF_LSM_CGROUP the same, regardless of attach_btf_id
2. Treat BPF_LSM_CGROUP+attach_btf_id as a separate hook point

I was doing (2) in the original patch, but switching to (1) here:

* bpf_prog_query returns all attached BPF_LSM_CGROUP programs
regardless of attach_btf_id
* attach_btf_id is exported via bpf_prog_info

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   5 ++
 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c      | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c     |   4 +-
 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index b9d2d6de63a7..432fc5f49567 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1432,6 +1432,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
 		__u32		attach_flags;
 		__aligned_u64	prog_ids;
 		__u32		prog_cnt;
+		__aligned_u64	prog_attach_flags; /* output: per-program attach_flags */
 	} query;
 
 	struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN command */
@@ -5911,6 +5912,10 @@ struct bpf_prog_info {
 	__u64 run_cnt;
 	__u64 recursion_misses;
 	__u32 verified_insns;
+	/* BTF ID of the function to attach to within BTF object identified
+	 * by btf_id.
+	 */
+	__u32 attach_btf_func_id;
 } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
 
 struct bpf_map_info {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
index a959cdd22870..08a1015ee09e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
@@ -1074,6 +1074,7 @@ static int cgroup_bpf_detach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog,
 static int __cgroup_bpf_query(struct cgroup *cgrp, const union bpf_attr *attr,
 			      union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 {
+	__u32 __user *prog_attach_flags = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->query.prog_attach_flags);
 	__u32 __user *prog_ids = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->query.prog_ids);
 	enum bpf_attach_type type = attr->query.attach_type;
 	enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type atype;
@@ -1081,50 +1082,92 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_query(struct cgroup *cgrp, const union bpf_attr *attr,
 	struct hlist_head *progs;
 	struct bpf_prog *prog;
 	int cnt, ret = 0, i;
+	int total_cnt = 0;
 	u32 flags;
 
-	atype = to_cgroup_bpf_attach_type(type);
-	if (atype < 0)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type from_atype, to_atype;
 
-	progs = &cgrp->bpf.progs[atype];
-	flags = cgrp->bpf.flags[atype];
+	if (type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP) {
+		from_atype = CGROUP_LSM_START;
+		to_atype = CGROUP_LSM_END;
+	} else {
+		from_atype = to_cgroup_bpf_attach_type(type);
+		if (from_atype < 0)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		to_atype = from_atype;
+	}
 
-	effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
-					      lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
+	for (atype = from_atype; atype <= to_atype; atype++) {
+		progs = &cgrp->bpf.progs[atype];
+		flags = cgrp->bpf.flags[atype];
 
-	if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE)
-		cnt = bpf_prog_array_length(effective);
-	else
-		cnt = prog_list_length(progs);
+		effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
+						      lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
 
-	if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.attach_flags, &flags, sizeof(flags)))
-		return -EFAULT;
-	if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.prog_cnt, &cnt, sizeof(cnt)))
+		if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE)
+			total_cnt += bpf_prog_array_length(effective);
+		else
+			total_cnt += prog_list_length(progs);
+	}
+
+	if (type != BPF_LSM_CGROUP)
+		if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.attach_flags, &flags, sizeof(flags)))
+			return -EFAULT;
+	if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.prog_cnt, &total_cnt, sizeof(total_cnt)))
 		return -EFAULT;
-	if (attr->query.prog_cnt == 0 || !prog_ids || !cnt)
+	if (attr->query.prog_cnt == 0 || !prog_ids || !total_cnt)
 		/* return early if user requested only program count + flags */
 		return 0;
-	if (attr->query.prog_cnt < cnt) {
-		cnt = attr->query.prog_cnt;
+
+	if (attr->query.prog_cnt < total_cnt) {
+		total_cnt = attr->query.prog_cnt;
 		ret = -ENOSPC;
 	}
 
-	if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE) {
-		return bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(effective, prog_ids, cnt);
-	} else {
-		struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
-		u32 id;
+	for (atype = from_atype; atype <= to_atype; atype++) {
+		if (total_cnt <= 0)
+			break;
 
-		i = 0;
-		hlist_for_each_entry(pl, progs, node) {
-			prog = prog_list_prog(pl);
-			id = prog->aux->id;
-			if (copy_to_user(prog_ids + i, &id, sizeof(id)))
-				return -EFAULT;
-			if (++i == cnt)
-				break;
+		progs = &cgrp->bpf.progs[atype];
+		flags = cgrp->bpf.flags[atype];
+
+		effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
+						      lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
+
+		if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE)
+			cnt = bpf_prog_array_length(effective);
+		else
+			cnt = prog_list_length(progs);
+
+		if (cnt >= total_cnt)
+			cnt = total_cnt;
+
+		if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE) {
+			ret = bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(effective, prog_ids, cnt);
+		} else {
+			struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
+			u32 id;
+
+			i = 0;
+			hlist_for_each_entry(pl, progs, node) {
+				prog = prog_list_prog(pl);
+				id = prog->aux->id;
+				if (copy_to_user(prog_ids + i, &id, sizeof(id)))
+					return -EFAULT;
+				if (++i == cnt)
+					break;
+			}
 		}
+
+		if (prog_attach_flags)
+			for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
+				if (copy_to_user(prog_attach_flags + i, &flags, sizeof(flags)))
+					return -EFAULT;
+
+		prog_ids += cnt;
+		total_cnt -= cnt;
+		if (prog_attach_flags)
+			prog_attach_flags += cnt;
 	}
 	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 5ed2093e51cc..4137583c04a2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3520,7 +3520,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
 	}
 }
 
-#define BPF_PROG_QUERY_LAST_FIELD query.prog_cnt
+#define BPF_PROG_QUERY_LAST_FIELD query.prog_attach_flags
 
 static int bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
 			  union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
@@ -3556,6 +3556,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
 	case BPF_CGROUP_SYSCTL:
 	case BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT:
 	case BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOPT:
+	case BPF_LSM_CGROUP:
 		return cgroup_bpf_prog_query(attr, uattr);
 	case BPF_LIRC_MODE2:
 		return lirc_prog_query(attr, uattr);
@@ -4066,6 +4067,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct file *file,
 
 	if (prog->aux->btf)
 		info.btf_id = btf_obj_id(prog->aux->btf);
+	info.attach_btf_func_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
 
 	ulen = info.nr_func_info;
 	info.nr_func_info = prog->aux->func_info_cnt;
-- 
2.36.1.124.g0e6072fb45-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-18 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-18 22:55 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: cgroup_sock lsm flavor Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/11] bpf: add bpf_func_t and trampoline helpers Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-20  0:45   ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-21  0:03     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/11] bpf: convert cgroup_bpf.progs to hlist Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/11] bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-20  1:00   ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-21  0:03     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 15:41       ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-21  0:53   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  5:40       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 15:56         ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  5:57       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/11] bpf: minimize number of allocated lsm slots per program Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-21  6:56   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24  2:14     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  5:53       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-18 22:55 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2022-05-19  2:31   ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/11] bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF_LSM_CGROUP kernel test robot
2022-05-19 14:57   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-23 23:23   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  3:48   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 15:55     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24 17:50       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 23:45         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-25  4:03           ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-25  4:39             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-25 16:01               ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-25 17:02                 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-25 20:39                   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-25 21:25                     ` sdf
2022-05-26  0:03                       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-26  1:23                         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-26  2:50                           ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-31 23:08                             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/11] bpf: allow writing to a subset of sock fields from lsm progtype Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/11] libbpf: implement bpf_prog_query_opts Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 23:22   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  3:45       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  4:01         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/11] libbpf: add lsm_cgoup_sock type Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 23:26   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/11] bpftool: implement cgroup tree for BPF_LSM_CGROUP Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/11] selftests/bpf: lsm_cgroup functional test Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/11] selftests/bpf: verify lsm_cgroup struct sock access Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 23:33   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  3:46       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-19 23:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: cgroup_sock lsm flavor Yonghong Song
2022-05-19 23:39   ` Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220518225531.558008-6-sdf@google.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox