BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	kafai@fb.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, jakub@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: cgroup_sock lsm flavor
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 16:34:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a732a8d-6e4f-0154-e317-795baa64022d@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220518225531.558008-1-sdf@google.com>



On 5/18/22 3:55 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> This series implements new lsm flavor for attaching per-cgroup programs to
> existing lsm hooks. The cgroup is taken out of 'current', unless
> the first argument of the hook is 'struct socket'. In this case,
> the cgroup association is taken out of socket. The attachment
> looks like a regular per-cgroup attachment: we add new BPF_LSM_CGROUP
> attach type which, together with attach_btf_id, signals per-cgroup lsm.
> Behind the scenes, we allocate trampoline shim program and
> attach to lsm. This program looks up cgroup from current/socket
> and runs cgroup's effective prog array. The rest of the per-cgroup BPF
> stays the same: hierarchy, local storage, retval conventions
> (return 1 == success).
> 
> Current limitations:
> * haven't considered sleepable bpf; can be extended later on
> * not sure the verifier does the right thing with null checks;
>    see latest selftest for details
> * total of 10 (global) per-cgroup LSM attach points
> 
> Cc: ast@kernel.org
> Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net
> Cc: kafai@fb.com
> Cc: kpsingh@kernel.org
> Cc: jakub@cloudflare.com
> 
> v7:
> - there were a lot of comments last time, hope I didn't forget anything,
>    some of the bigger ones:
>    - Martin: use/extend BTF_SOCK_TYPE_SOCKET
>    - Martin: expose bpf_set_retval
>    - Martin: reject 'return 0' at the verifier for 'void' hooks
>    - Martin: prog_query returns all BPF_LSM_CGROUP, prog_info
>      returns attach_btf_func_id
>    - Andrii: split libbpf changes
>    - Andrii: add field access test to test_progs, not test_verifier (still
>      using asm though)
> - things that I haven't addressed, stating them here explicitly, let
>    me know if some of these are still problematic:
>    1. Andrii: exposing only link-based api: seems like the changes
>       to support non-link-based ones are minimal, couple of lines,
>       so seems like it worth having it?
>    2. Alexei: applying cgroup_atype for all cgroup hooks, not only
>       cgroup lsm: looks a bit harder to apply everywhere that I
>       originally thought; with lsm cgroup, we have a shim_prog pointer where
>       we store cgroup_atype; for non-lsm programs, we don't have a
>       trace program where to store it, so we still need some kind
>       of global table to map from "static" hook to "dynamic" slot.
>       So I'm dropping this "can be easily extended" clause from the
>       description for now. I have converted this whole machinery
>       to an RCU-managed list to remove synchronize_rcu().
> - also note that I had to introduce new bpf_shim_tramp_link and
>    moved refcnt there; we need something to manage new bpf_tramp_link
> 
> v6:
> - remove active count & stats for shim program (Martin KaFai Lau)
> - remove NULL/error check for btf_vmlinux (Martin)
> - don't check cgroup_atype in bpf_cgroup_lsm_shim_release (Martin)
> - use old_prog (instead of passed one) in __cgroup_bpf_detach (Martin)
> - make sure attach_btf_id is the same in __cgroup_bpf_replace (Martin)
> - enable cgroup local storage and test it (Martin)
> - properly implement prog query and add bpftool & tests (Martin)
> - prohibit non-shared cgroup storage mode for BPF_LSM_CGROUP (Martin)
> 
> v5:
> - __cgroup_bpf_run_lsm_socket remove NULL sock/sk checks (Martin KaFai Lau)
> - __cgroup_bpf_run_lsm_{socket,current} s/prog/shim_prog/ (Martin)
> - make sure bpf_lsm_find_cgroup_shim works for hooks without args (Martin)
> - __cgroup_bpf_attach make sure attach_btf_id is the same when replacing (Martin)
> - call bpf_cgroup_lsm_shim_release only for LSM_CGROUP (Martin)
> - drop BPF_LSM_CGROUP from bpf_attach_type_to_tramp (Martin)
> - drop jited check from cgroup_shim_find (Martin)
> - new patch to convert cgroup_bpf to hlist_node (Jakub Sitnicki)
> - new shim flavor for 'struct sock' + list of exceptions (Martin)
> 
> v4:
> - fix build when jit is on but syscall is off
> 
> v3:
> - add BPF_LSM_CGROUP to bpftool
> - use simple int instead of refcnt_t (to avoid use-after-free
>    false positive)
> 
> v2:
> - addressed build bot failures
> 
> Stanislav Fomichev (11):
>    bpf: add bpf_func_t and trampoline helpers
>    bpf: convert cgroup_bpf.progs to hlist
>    bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor
>    bpf: minimize number of allocated lsm slots per program
>    bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF_LSM_CGROUP
>    bpf: allow writing to a subset of sock fields from lsm progtype
>    libbpf: implement bpf_prog_query_opts
>    libbpf: add lsm_cgoup_sock type
>    bpftool: implement cgroup tree for BPF_LSM_CGROUP
>    selftests/bpf: lsm_cgroup functional test
>    selftests/bpf: verify lsm_cgroup struct sock access
> 
>   arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                   |  24 +-
>   include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h               |  11 +-
>   include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h                    |   9 +-
>   include/linux/bpf.h                           |  36 +-
>   include/linux/bpf_lsm.h                       |   8 +
>   include/linux/btf_ids.h                       |   3 +-
>   include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |   6 +
>   kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c                          | 103 ++++
>   kernel/bpf/btf.c                              |  11 +
>   kernel/bpf/cgroup.c                           | 487 +++++++++++++++---
>   kernel/bpf/core.c                             |   2 +
>   kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          |  14 +-
>   kernel/bpf/trampoline.c                       | 244 ++++++++-
>   kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         |  31 +-
>   tools/bpf/bpftool/cgroup.c                    |  77 ++-
>   tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c                    |   1 +
>   tools/include/linux/btf_ids.h                 |   4 +-
>   tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |   6 +
>   tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c                           |  42 +-
>   tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h                           |  15 +
>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        |   2 +
>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                      |   1 +
>   .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c     | 346 +++++++++++++
>   .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm_cgroup.c  | 160 ++++++
>   24 files changed, 1480 insertions(+), 163 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm_cgroup.c

There are 4 test failures for test_progs in CI.
 
https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/runs/6511113546?check_suite_focus=true
All have error messages like:
     At program exit the register R0 has value (0xffffffff; 0x0) should 
have been in (0x0; 0x1)

Could you take a look?



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-19 23:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-18 22:55 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: cgroup_sock lsm flavor Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/11] bpf: add bpf_func_t and trampoline helpers Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-20  0:45   ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-21  0:03     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/11] bpf: convert cgroup_bpf.progs to hlist Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/11] bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-20  1:00   ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-21  0:03     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 15:41       ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-21  0:53   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  5:40       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 15:56         ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  5:57       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/11] bpf: minimize number of allocated lsm slots per program Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-21  6:56   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24  2:14     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  5:53       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/11] bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF_LSM_CGROUP Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-19  2:31   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-19 14:57   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-23 23:23   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  3:48   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 15:55     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24 17:50       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 23:45         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-25  4:03           ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-25  4:39             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-25 16:01               ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-25 17:02                 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-25 20:39                   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-25 21:25                     ` sdf
2022-05-26  0:03                       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-26  1:23                         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-26  2:50                           ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-31 23:08                             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/11] bpf: allow writing to a subset of sock fields from lsm progtype Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/11] libbpf: implement bpf_prog_query_opts Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 23:22   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  3:45       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  4:01         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/11] libbpf: add lsm_cgoup_sock type Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 23:26   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/11] bpftool: implement cgroup tree for BPF_LSM_CGROUP Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/11] selftests/bpf: lsm_cgroup functional test Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/11] selftests/bpf: verify lsm_cgroup struct sock access Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 23:33   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24  2:15     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24  3:46       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-19 23:34 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-05-19 23:39   ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: cgroup_sock lsm flavor Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3a732a8d-6e4f-0154-e317-795baa64022d@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox