[PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Fix test_probe_user on s390x

[PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Fix test_probe_user on s390x

[Ilya Leoshkevich]

Hi,

This is a fix for [1]: test_probe_user fails on s390x, because it hooks
only connect(), but not socketcall(SYS_CONNECT).

Patch 1 adds this quirk to BPF_KSYSCALL documentation.
Patch 2 fixes the test by attaching a prog to socketcall().

Best regards,
Ilya

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/06631b122b9bd6258139a36b971bba3e79543503.camel@linux.ibm.com/

Ilya Leoshkevich (2):
  libbpf: Extend BPF_KSYSCALL documentation
  selftests/bpf: Attach to socketcall() in test_probe_user

 tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h                   | 14 +++++---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c     | 35 +++++++++++++------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c     | 28 +++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

-- 
2.35.3

[PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: Extend BPF_KSYSCALL documentation

[Ilya Leoshkevich]

Explicitly list known quirks.
Mention that socket-related syscalls can be invoked via socketcall().

Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
index f4d3e1e2abe2..9d2feab7d903 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
@@ -523,10 +523,16 @@ static __always_inline typeof(name(0)) ____##name(struct pt_regs *ctx, ##args)
  * Original struct pt_regs * context is preserved as 'ctx' argument. This might
  * be necessary when using BPF helpers like bpf_perf_event_output().
  *
- * At the moment BPF_KSYSCALL does not handle all the calling convention
- * quirks for mmap(), clone() and compat syscalls transparrently. This may or
- * may not change in the future. User needs to take extra measures to handle
- * such quirks explicitly, if necessary.
+ * At the moment BPF_KSYSCALL does not transparently handle all the calling
+ * convention quirks for the following syscalls:
+ *
+ * - mmap(): __ARCH_WANT_SYS_OLD_MMAP.
+ * - clone(): CLONE_BACKWARDS, CLONE_BACKWARDS2 and CLONE_BACKWARDS3.
+ * - socket-related syscalls: __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SOCKETCALL.
+ * - compat syscalls.
+ *
+ * This may or may not change in the future. User needs to take extra measures
+ * to handle such quirks explicitly, if necessary.
  *
  * This macro relies on BPF CO-RE support and virtual __kconfig externs.
  */
-- 
2.35.3

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: Extend BPF_KSYSCALL documentation

[Jiri Olsa]

On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 04:03:43AM +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Explicitly list known quirks.
> Mention that socket-related syscalls can be invoked via socketcall().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 14 ++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
> index f4d3e1e2abe2..9d2feab7d903 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
> @@ -523,10 +523,16 @@ static __always_inline typeof(name(0)) ____##name(struct pt_regs *ctx, ##args)
>   * Original struct pt_regs * context is preserved as 'ctx' argument. This might
>   * be necessary when using BPF helpers like bpf_perf_event_output().
>   *
> - * At the moment BPF_KSYSCALL does not handle all the calling convention
> - * quirks for mmap(), clone() and compat syscalls transparrently. This may or
> - * may not change in the future. User needs to take extra measures to handle
> - * such quirks explicitly, if necessary.
> + * At the moment BPF_KSYSCALL does not transparently handle all the calling
> + * convention quirks for the following syscalls:
> + *
> + * - mmap(): __ARCH_WANT_SYS_OLD_MMAP.
> + * - clone(): CLONE_BACKWARDS, CLONE_BACKWARDS2 and CLONE_BACKWARDS3.

nit, these could have CONFIG_ prefix to make it more
obvious it's config options

jirka

> + * - socket-related syscalls: __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SOCKETCALL.
> + * - compat syscalls.
> + *
> + * This may or may not change in the future. User needs to take extra measures
> + * to handle such quirks explicitly, if necessary.
>   *
>   * This macro relies on BPF CO-RE support and virtual __kconfig externs.
>   */
> -- 
> 2.35.3
> 

[PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Attach to socketcall() in test_probe_user

[Ilya Leoshkevich]

test_probe_user fails on architectures where libc uses
socketcall(SYS_CONNECT) instead of connect(). Fix by attaching to
socketcall as well.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c     | 35 +++++++++++++------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c     | 28 +++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c
index abf890d066eb..76c8e06b0357 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c
@@ -4,25 +4,35 @@
 /* TODO: corrupts other tests uses connect() */
 void serial_test_probe_user(void)
 {
-	const char *prog_name = "handle_sys_connect";
+	const char *prog_names[] = {
+		"handle_sys_connect",
+#if defined(__s390x__)
+		"handle_sys_socketcall",
+#endif
+	};
+	const size_t prog_count = ARRAY_SIZE(prog_names);
 	const char *obj_file = "./test_probe_user.o";
 	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts, );
 	int err, results_map_fd, sock_fd, duration = 0;
 	struct sockaddr curr, orig, tmp;
 	struct sockaddr_in *in = (struct sockaddr_in *)&curr;
-	struct bpf_link *kprobe_link = NULL;
-	struct bpf_program *kprobe_prog;
+	struct bpf_link *kprobe_links[ARRAY_SIZE(prog_names)] = {};
+	struct bpf_program *kprobe_progs[ARRAY_SIZE(prog_names)];
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
 	static const int zero = 0;
+	size_t i;
 
 	obj = bpf_object__open_file(obj_file, &opts);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(obj, "obj_open_file"))
 		return;
 
-	kprobe_prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(obj, prog_name);
-	if (CHECK(!kprobe_prog, "find_probe",
-		  "prog '%s' not found\n", prog_name))
-		goto cleanup;
+	for (i = 0; i < prog_count; i++) {
+		kprobe_progs[i] =
+			bpf_object__find_program_by_name(obj, prog_names[i]);
+		if (CHECK(!kprobe_progs[i], "find_probe",
+			  "prog '%s' not found\n", prog_names[i]))
+			goto cleanup;
+	}
 
 	err = bpf_object__load(obj);
 	if (CHECK(err, "obj_load", "err %d\n", err))
@@ -33,9 +43,11 @@ void serial_test_probe_user(void)
 		  "err %d\n", results_map_fd))
 		goto cleanup;
 
-	kprobe_link = bpf_program__attach(kprobe_prog);
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(kprobe_link, "attach_kprobe"))
-		goto cleanup;
+	for (i = 0; i < prog_count; i++) {
+		kprobe_links[i] = bpf_program__attach(kprobe_progs[i]);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(kprobe_links[i], "attach_kprobe"))
+			goto cleanup;
+	}
 
 	memset(&curr, 0, sizeof(curr));
 	in->sin_family = AF_INET;
@@ -69,6 +81,7 @@ void serial_test_probe_user(void)
 		  inet_ntoa(in->sin_addr), ntohs(in->sin_port)))
 		goto cleanup;
 cleanup:
-	bpf_link__destroy(kprobe_link);
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prog_names); i++)
+		bpf_link__destroy(kprobe_links[i]);
 	bpf_object__close(obj);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c
index 8e1495008e4d..78e50c37fa21 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c
@@ -5,10 +5,13 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
 #include "bpf_misc.h"
 
+#ifndef SYS_CONNECT
+#define SYS_CONNECT 3
+#endif
+
 static struct sockaddr_in old;
 
-SEC("ksyscall/connect")
-int BPF_KSYSCALL(handle_sys_connect, int fd, struct sockaddr_in *uservaddr, int addrlen)
+static int handle_sys_connect_common(struct sockaddr_in *uservaddr)
 {
 	struct sockaddr_in new;
 
@@ -19,4 +22,25 @@ int BPF_KSYSCALL(handle_sys_connect, int fd, struct sockaddr_in *uservaddr, int
 	return 0;
 }
 
+SEC("ksyscall/connect")
+int BPF_KSYSCALL(handle_sys_connect, int fd, struct sockaddr_in *uservaddr,
+		 int addrlen)
+{
+	return handle_sys_connect_common(uservaddr);
+}
+
+SEC("ksyscall/socketcall")
+int BPF_KSYSCALL(handle_sys_socketcall, int call, unsigned long *args)
+{
+	if (call == SYS_CONNECT) {
+		struct sockaddr_in *uservaddr;
+
+		bpf_probe_read_user(&uservaddr, sizeof(uservaddr), &args[1]);
+
+		return handle_sys_connect_common(uservaddr);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.35.3

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Attach to socketcall() in test_probe_user

[Jiri Olsa]

On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 04:03:44AM +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> test_probe_user fails on architectures where libc uses
> socketcall(SYS_CONNECT) instead of connect(). Fix by attaching to
> socketcall as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c     | 35 +++++++++++++------
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c     | 28 +++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c
> index abf890d066eb..76c8e06b0357 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c
> @@ -4,25 +4,35 @@
>  /* TODO: corrupts other tests uses connect() */
>  void serial_test_probe_user(void)
>  {
> -	const char *prog_name = "handle_sys_connect";
> +	const char *prog_names[] = {
> +		"handle_sys_connect",
> +#if defined(__s390x__)
> +		"handle_sys_socketcall",
> +#endif
> +	};
> +	const size_t prog_count = ARRAY_SIZE(prog_names);
>  	const char *obj_file = "./test_probe_user.o";
>  	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts, );
>  	int err, results_map_fd, sock_fd, duration = 0;
>  	struct sockaddr curr, orig, tmp;
>  	struct sockaddr_in *in = (struct sockaddr_in *)&curr;
> -	struct bpf_link *kprobe_link = NULL;
> -	struct bpf_program *kprobe_prog;
> +	struct bpf_link *kprobe_links[ARRAY_SIZE(prog_names)] = {};
> +	struct bpf_program *kprobe_progs[ARRAY_SIZE(prog_names)];
>  	struct bpf_object *obj;
>  	static const int zero = 0;
> +	size_t i;
>  
>  	obj = bpf_object__open_file(obj_file, &opts);
>  	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(obj, "obj_open_file"))
>  		return;
>  
> -	kprobe_prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(obj, prog_name);
> -	if (CHECK(!kprobe_prog, "find_probe",
> -		  "prog '%s' not found\n", prog_name))
> -		goto cleanup;
> +	for (i = 0; i < prog_count; i++) {
> +		kprobe_progs[i] =
> +			bpf_object__find_program_by_name(obj, prog_names[i]);
> +		if (CHECK(!kprobe_progs[i], "find_probe",
> +			  "prog '%s' not found\n", prog_names[i]))
> +			goto cleanup;
> +	}
>  
>  	err = bpf_object__load(obj);
>  	if (CHECK(err, "obj_load", "err %d\n", err))
> @@ -33,9 +43,11 @@ void serial_test_probe_user(void)
>  		  "err %d\n", results_map_fd))
>  		goto cleanup;
>  
> -	kprobe_link = bpf_program__attach(kprobe_prog);
> -	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(kprobe_link, "attach_kprobe"))
> -		goto cleanup;
> +	for (i = 0; i < prog_count; i++) {
> +		kprobe_links[i] = bpf_program__attach(kprobe_progs[i]);
> +		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(kprobe_links[i], "attach_kprobe"))
> +			goto cleanup;
> +	}
>  
>  	memset(&curr, 0, sizeof(curr));
>  	in->sin_family = AF_INET;
> @@ -69,6 +81,7 @@ void serial_test_probe_user(void)
>  		  inet_ntoa(in->sin_addr), ntohs(in->sin_port)))
>  		goto cleanup;
>  cleanup:
> -	bpf_link__destroy(kprobe_link);
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prog_names); i++)

nit, you used prog_count in all places, could be also here

> +		bpf_link__destroy(kprobe_links[i]);
>  	bpf_object__close(obj);
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c
> index 8e1495008e4d..78e50c37fa21 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c
> @@ -5,10 +5,13 @@
>  #include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
>  #include "bpf_misc.h"
>  
> +#ifndef SYS_CONNECT
> +#define SYS_CONNECT 3
> +#endif
> +
>  static struct sockaddr_in old;
>  
> -SEC("ksyscall/connect")
> -int BPF_KSYSCALL(handle_sys_connect, int fd, struct sockaddr_in *uservaddr, int addrlen)
> +static int handle_sys_connect_common(struct sockaddr_in *uservaddr)
>  {
>  	struct sockaddr_in new;
>  
> @@ -19,4 +22,25 @@ int BPF_KSYSCALL(handle_sys_connect, int fd, struct sockaddr_in *uservaddr, int
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +SEC("ksyscall/connect")
> +int BPF_KSYSCALL(handle_sys_connect, int fd, struct sockaddr_in *uservaddr,
> +		 int addrlen)
> +{
> +	return handle_sys_connect_common(uservaddr);
> +}
> +
> +SEC("ksyscall/socketcall")
> +int BPF_KSYSCALL(handle_sys_socketcall, int call, unsigned long *args)
> +{
> +	if (call == SYS_CONNECT) {
> +		struct sockaddr_in *uservaddr;
> +
> +		bpf_probe_read_user(&uservaddr, sizeof(uservaddr), &args[1]);
> +
> +		return handle_sys_connect_common(uservaddr);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

should this function be under __s390x__ ifdef same as in the user side?

jirka