BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@meta.com>,
	Delyan Kratunov <delyank@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 23/25] selftests/bpf: Add failure test cases for spin lock pairing
Date: Tue,  8 Nov 2022 04:39:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221107230950.7117-24-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221107230950.7117-1-memxor@gmail.com>

First, ensure that whenever a bpf_spin_lock is present in an allocation,
the reg->id is preserved. This won't be true for global variables
however, since they have a single map value per map, hence the verifier
harcodes it to 0 (so that multiple pseudo ldimm64 insns can yield the
same lock object per map at a given offset).

Next, add test cases for all possible combinations (kptr, global, map
value, inner map value). Since we lifted restriction on locking in inner
maps, also add test cases for them. Currently, each lookup into an inner
map gets a fresh reg->id, so even if the reg->map_ptr is same, they will
be treated as separate allocations and the incorrect unlock pairing will
be rejected.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/spin_lock.c      |  89 +++++++-
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_spin_lock_fail.c | 204 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_spin_lock_fail.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/spin_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/spin_lock.c
index 1f720002fe56..5df959c78fee 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/spin_lock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/spin_lock.c
@@ -3,6 +3,79 @@
 #include <network_helpers.h>
 
 #include "test_spin_lock.skel.h"
+#include "test_spin_lock_fail.skel.h"
+
+static char log_buf[1024 * 1024];
+
+static struct {
+	const char *prog_name;
+	const char *err_msg;
+} spin_lock_fail_tests[] = {
+	{ "lock_id_kptr_preserve",
+	  "5: (bf) r1 = r0                       ; R0_w=ptr_foo(id=2,ref_obj_id=2,off=0,imm=0) "
+	  "R1_w=ptr_foo(id=2,ref_obj_id=2,off=0,imm=0) refs=2\n6: (85) call bpf_this_cpu_ptr#154\n"
+	  "R1 type=ptr_ expected=percpu_ptr_" },
+	{ "lock_id_global_zero",
+	  "; R1_w=map_value(off=0,ks=4,vs=4,imm=0)\n2: (85) call bpf_this_cpu_ptr#154\n"
+	  "R1 type=map_value expected=percpu_ptr_" },
+	{ "lock_id_mapval_preserve",
+	  "8: (bf) r1 = r0                       ; R0_w=map_value(id=1,off=0,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0) "
+	  "R1_w=map_value(id=1,off=0,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0)\n9: (85) call bpf_this_cpu_ptr#154\n"
+	  "R1 type=map_value expected=percpu_ptr_" },
+	{ "lock_id_innermapval_preserve",
+	  "13: (bf) r1 = r0                      ; R0=map_value(id=2,off=0,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0) "
+	  "R1_w=map_value(id=2,off=0,ks=4,vs=8,imm=0)\n14: (85) call bpf_this_cpu_ptr#154\n"
+	  "R1 type=map_value expected=percpu_ptr_" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_kptr_kptr", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_kptr_global", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_kptr_mapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_kptr_innermapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_global_global", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_global_kptr", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_global_mapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_global_innermapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_mapval_mapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_mapval_kptr", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_mapval_global", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_mapval_innermapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_innermapval_innermapval1", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_innermapval_innermapval2", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_innermapval_kptr", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_innermapval_global", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+	{ "lock_id_mismatch_innermapval_mapval", "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock" },
+};
+
+static void test_spin_lock_fail_prog(const char *prog_name, const char *err_msg)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts, .kernel_log_buf = log_buf,
+						.kernel_log_size = sizeof(log_buf),
+						.kernel_log_level = 1);
+	struct test_spin_lock_fail *skel;
+	struct bpf_program *prog;
+	int ret;
+
+	skel = test_spin_lock_fail__open_opts(&opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_spin_lock_fail__open_opts"))
+		return;
+
+	prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, prog_name);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name"))
+		goto end;
+
+	bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true);
+
+	ret = test_spin_lock_fail__load(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR(ret, "test_spin_lock_fail__load must fail"))
+		goto end;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(log_buf, err_msg), "expected error message")) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Expected: %s\n", err_msg);
+		fprintf(stderr, "Verifier: %s\n", log_buf);
+	}
+
+end:
+	test_spin_lock_fail__destroy(skel);
+}
 
 static void *spin_lock_thread(void *arg)
 {
@@ -19,7 +92,7 @@ static void *spin_lock_thread(void *arg)
 	pthread_exit(arg);
 }
 
-void test_spinlock(void)
+void test_spin_lock_success(void)
 {
 	struct test_spin_lock *skel;
 	pthread_t thread_id[4];
@@ -44,3 +117,17 @@ void test_spinlock(void)
 end:
 	test_spin_lock__destroy(skel);
 }
+
+void test_spin_lock(void)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	test_spin_lock_success();
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(spin_lock_fail_tests); i++) {
+		if (!test__start_subtest(spin_lock_fail_tests[i].prog_name))
+			continue;
+		test_spin_lock_fail_prog(spin_lock_fail_tests[i].prog_name,
+					 spin_lock_fail_tests[i].err_msg);
+	}
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_spin_lock_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_spin_lock_fail.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..86cd183ef6dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_spin_lock_fail.c
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_experimental.h"
+
+struct foo {
+	struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
+	int data;
+};
+
+struct array_map {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, struct foo);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+} array_map SEC(".maps");
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, int);
+	__array(values, struct array_map);
+} map_of_maps SEC(".maps") = {
+	.values = {
+		[0] = &array_map,
+	},
+};
+
+SEC(".data.A") struct bpf_spin_lock lockA;
+SEC(".data.B") struct bpf_spin_lock lockB;
+
+SEC("?tc")
+int lock_id_kptr_preserve(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct foo *f;
+
+	f = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*f));
+	if (!f)
+		return 0;
+	bpf_this_cpu_ptr(f);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+int lock_id_global_zero(void *ctx)
+{
+	bpf_this_cpu_ptr(&lockA);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+int lock_id_mapval_preserve(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct foo *f;
+	int key = 0;
+
+	f = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&array_map, &key);
+	if (!f)
+		return 0;
+	bpf_this_cpu_ptr(f);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+int lock_id_innermapval_preserve(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct foo *f;
+	int key = 0;
+	void *map;
+
+	map = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&map_of_maps, &key);
+	if (!map)
+		return 0;
+	f = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &key);
+	if (!f)
+		return 0;
+	bpf_this_cpu_ptr(f);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#define CHECK(test, A, B)                                      \
+	SEC("?tc")                                             \
+	int lock_id_mismatch_##test(void *ctx)                 \
+	{                                                      \
+		struct foo *f1, *f2, *v, *iv;                  \
+		int key = 0;                                   \
+		void *map;                                     \
+                                                               \
+		map = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&map_of_maps, &key); \
+		if (!map)                                      \
+			return 0;                              \
+		iv = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &key);           \
+		if (!iv)                                       \
+			return 0;                              \
+		v = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&array_map, &key);     \
+		if (!v)                                        \
+			return 0;                              \
+		f1 = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*f1));                 \
+		if (!f1)                                       \
+			return 0;                              \
+		f2 = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*f2));                 \
+		if (!f2) {                                     \
+			bpf_obj_drop(f1);                      \
+			return 0;                              \
+		}                                              \
+		bpf_spin_lock(A);                              \
+		bpf_spin_unlock(B);                            \
+		return 0;                                      \
+	}
+
+CHECK(kptr_kptr, &f1->lock, &f2->lock);
+CHECK(kptr_global, &f1->lock, &lockA);
+CHECK(kptr_mapval, &f1->lock, &v->lock);
+CHECK(kptr_innermapval, &f1->lock, &iv->lock);
+
+CHECK(global_global, &lockA, &lockB);
+CHECK(global_kptr, &lockA, &f1->lock);
+CHECK(global_mapval, &lockA, &v->lock);
+CHECK(global_innermapval, &lockA, &iv->lock);
+
+SEC("?tc")
+int lock_id_mismatch_mapval_mapval(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct foo *f1, *f2;
+	int key = 0;
+
+	f1 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&array_map, &key);
+	if (!f1)
+		return 0;
+	f2 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&array_map, &key);
+	if (!f2)
+		return 0;
+
+	bpf_spin_lock(&f1->lock);
+	f1->data = 42;
+	bpf_spin_unlock(&f2->lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+CHECK(mapval_kptr, &v->lock, &f1->lock);
+CHECK(mapval_global, &v->lock, &lockB);
+CHECK(mapval_innermapval, &v->lock, &iv->lock);
+
+SEC("?tc")
+int lock_id_mismatch_innermapval_innermapval1(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct foo *f1, *f2;
+	int key = 0;
+	void *map;
+
+	map = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&map_of_maps, &key);
+	if (!map)
+		return 0;
+	f1 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &key);
+	if (!f1)
+		return 0;
+	f2 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &key);
+	if (!f2)
+		return 0;
+
+	bpf_spin_lock(&f1->lock);
+	f1->data = 42;
+	bpf_spin_unlock(&f2->lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?tc")
+int lock_id_mismatch_innermapval_innermapval2(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct foo *f1, *f2;
+	int key = 0;
+	void *map;
+
+	map = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&map_of_maps, &key);
+	if (!map)
+		return 0;
+	f1 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &key);
+	if (!f1)
+		return 0;
+	map = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&map_of_maps, &key);
+	if (!map)
+		return 0;
+	f2 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &key);
+	if (!f2)
+		return 0;
+
+	bpf_spin_lock(&f1->lock);
+	f1->data = 42;
+	bpf_spin_unlock(&f2->lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+CHECK(innermapval_kptr, &iv->lock, &f1->lock);
+CHECK(innermapval_global, &iv->lock, &lockA);
+CHECK(innermapval_mapval, &iv->lock, &v->lock);
+
+#undef CHECK
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.38.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-07 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-07 23:09 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/25] Local kptrs, BPF linked lists Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/25] bpf: Remove BPF_MAP_OFF_ARR_MAX Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/25] bpf: Fix copy_map_value, zero_map_value Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/25] bpf: Support bpf_list_head in map values Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-08 23:01   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-08 23:39     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-09  0:22       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-09  1:03         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-09 16:41           ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-09 23:14             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-09 23:11           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-09 23:35             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/25] bpf: Rename RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-08 23:08   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/25] bpf: Rename MEM_ALLOC to MEM_RINGBUF Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-08 23:14   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-08 23:49     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-09  0:26       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-09  1:05         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-09 22:58           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/25] bpf: Introduce local kptrs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-08 23:29   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-09  0:00     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-09  0:36       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-09  1:32         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-09 17:00           ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-09 23:23             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-09 23:21           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/25] bpf: Recognize bpf_{spin_lock,list_head,list_node} in " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/25] bpf: Verify ownership relationships for user BTF types Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/25] bpf: Allow locking bpf_spin_lock in local kptr Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/25] bpf: Allow locking bpf_spin_lock global variables Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-08 23:37   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-09  0:03     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/25] bpf: Allow locking bpf_spin_lock in inner map values Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/25] bpf: Rewrite kfunc argument handling Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 13/25] bpf: Drop kfunc bits from btf_check_func_arg_match Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 14/25] bpf: Support constant scalar arguments for kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/25] bpf: Teach verifier about non-size constant arguments Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-09  0:05   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-09 16:29     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 16/25] bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 17/25] bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_drop Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 18/25] bpf: Permit NULL checking pointer with non-zero fixed offset Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 19/25] bpf: Introduce single ownership BPF linked list API Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 20/25] bpf: Add 'release on unlock' logic for bpf_list_push_{front,back} Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 21/25] selftests/bpf: Add __contains macro to bpf_experimental.h Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 22/25] selftests/bpf: Update spinlock selftest Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-09  0:13   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-09 16:32     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 24/25] selftests/bpf: Add BPF linked list API tests Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 25/25] selftests/bpf: Add BTF sanity tests Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-09  0:18   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-09 16:33     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221107230950.7117-24-memxor@gmail.com \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@meta.com \
    --cc=delyank@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox