linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with Linus' tree

linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with Linus' tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1527 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:

  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h

between commit:

  be80a1d3f9db ("bpf: Generalize check_ctx_reg for reuse with other types")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  d583691c47dc ("bpf: Introduce mem, size argument pair support for kfunc")

from the bpf-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index e9993172f892,ac4797155412..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@@ -519,8 -519,10 +519,10 @@@ bpf_prog_offload_replace_insn(struct bp
  void
  bpf_prog_offload_remove_insns(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off, u32 cnt);
  
 -int check_ctx_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 -		  const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int regno);
 +int check_ptr_off_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 +		      const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int regno);
+ int check_kfunc_mem_size_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
+ 			     u32 regno);
  int check_mem_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
  		   u32 regno, u32 mem_size);
  

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with Linus' tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4688 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:

  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_link.c

between commit:

  4b27480dcaa7 ("bpf/selftests: convert xdp_link test to ASSERT_* macros")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  544356524dd6 ("selftests/bpf: switch to new libbpf XDP APIs")

from the bpf-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_link.c
index b2b357f8c74c,0c5e4ea8eaae..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_link.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_link.c
@@@ -8,9 -8,9 +8,9 @@@
  
  void serial_test_xdp_link(void)
  {
- 	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_xdp_set_link_opts, opts, .old_fd = -1);
 -	__u32 duration = 0, id1, id2, id0 = 0, prog_fd1, prog_fd2, err;
  	struct test_xdp_link *skel1 = NULL, *skel2 = NULL;
 +	__u32 id1, id2, id0 = 0, prog_fd1, prog_fd2;
+ 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_xdp_attach_opts, opts);
  	struct bpf_link_info link_info;
  	struct bpf_prog_info prog_info;
  	struct bpf_link *link;
@@@ -41,14 -40,14 +41,14 @@@
  	id2 = prog_info.id;
  
  	/* set initial prog attachment */
- 	err = bpf_set_link_xdp_fd_opts(IFINDEX_LO, prog_fd1, XDP_FLAGS_REPLACE, &opts);
+ 	err = bpf_xdp_attach(IFINDEX_LO, prog_fd1, XDP_FLAGS_REPLACE, &opts);
 -	if (CHECK(err, "fd_attach", "initial prog attach failed: %d\n", err))
 +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fd_attach"))
  		goto cleanup;
  
  	/* validate prog ID */
- 	err = bpf_get_link_xdp_id(IFINDEX_LO, &id0, 0);
+ 	err = bpf_xdp_query_id(IFINDEX_LO, 0, &id0);
 -	CHECK(err || id0 != id1, "id1_check",
 -	      "loaded prog id %u != id1 %u, err %d", id0, id1, err);
 +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "id1_check_err") || !ASSERT_EQ(id0, id1, "id1_check_val"))
 +		goto cleanup;
  
  	/* BPF link is not allowed to replace prog attachment */
  	link = bpf_program__attach_xdp(skel1->progs.xdp_handler, IFINDEX_LO);
@@@ -61,9 -60,9 +61,9 @@@
  	}
  
  	/* detach BPF program */
- 	opts.old_fd = prog_fd1;
- 	err = bpf_set_link_xdp_fd_opts(IFINDEX_LO, -1, XDP_FLAGS_REPLACE, &opts);
+ 	opts.old_prog_fd = prog_fd1;
+ 	err = bpf_xdp_detach(IFINDEX_LO, XDP_FLAGS_REPLACE, &opts);
 -	if (CHECK(err, "prog_detach", "failed %d\n", err))
 +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "prog_detach"))
  		goto cleanup;
  
  	/* now BPF link should attach successfully */
@@@ -73,24 -72,25 +73,24 @@@
  	skel1->links.xdp_handler = link;
  
  	/* validate prog ID */
- 	err = bpf_get_link_xdp_id(IFINDEX_LO, &id0, 0);
+ 	err = bpf_xdp_query_id(IFINDEX_LO, 0, &id0);
 -	if (CHECK(err || id0 != id1, "id1_check",
 -		  "loaded prog id %u != id1 %u, err %d", id0, id1, err))
 +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "id1_check_err") || !ASSERT_EQ(id0, id1, "id1_check_val"))
  		goto cleanup;
  
  	/* BPF prog attach is not allowed to replace BPF link */
- 	opts.old_fd = prog_fd1;
- 	err = bpf_set_link_xdp_fd_opts(IFINDEX_LO, prog_fd2, XDP_FLAGS_REPLACE, &opts);
+ 	opts.old_prog_fd = prog_fd1;
+ 	err = bpf_xdp_attach(IFINDEX_LO, prog_fd2, XDP_FLAGS_REPLACE, &opts);
 -	if (CHECK(!err, "prog_attach_fail", "unexpected success\n"))
 +	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "prog_attach_fail"))
  		goto cleanup;
  
  	/* Can't force-update when BPF link is active */
- 	err = bpf_set_link_xdp_fd(IFINDEX_LO, prog_fd2, 0);
+ 	err = bpf_xdp_attach(IFINDEX_LO, prog_fd2, 0, NULL);
 -	if (CHECK(!err, "prog_update_fail", "unexpected success\n"))
 +	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "prog_update_fail"))
  		goto cleanup;
  
  	/* Can't force-detach when BPF link is active */
- 	err = bpf_set_link_xdp_fd(IFINDEX_LO, -1, 0);
+ 	err = bpf_xdp_detach(IFINDEX_LO, 0, NULL);
 -	if (CHECK(!err, "prog_detach_fail", "unexpected success\n"))
 +	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "prog_detach_fail"))
  		goto cleanup;
  
  	/* BPF link is not allowed to replace another BPF link */
@@@ -109,8 -109,9 +109,8 @@@
  		goto cleanup;
  	skel2->links.xdp_handler = link;
  
- 	err = bpf_get_link_xdp_id(IFINDEX_LO, &id0, 0);
+ 	err = bpf_xdp_query_id(IFINDEX_LO, 0, &id0);
 -	if (CHECK(err || id0 != id2, "id2_check",
 -		  "loaded prog id %u != id2 %u, err %d", id0, id1, err))
 +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "id2_check_err") || !ASSERT_EQ(id0, id2, "id2_check_val"))
  		goto cleanup;
  
  	/* updating program under active BPF link works as expected */

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with Linus' tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4880 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:

  kernel/bpf/offload.c

between commit:

  ef01f4e25c17 ("bpf: restore the ebpf program ID for BPF_AUDIT_UNLOAD and PERF_BPF_EVENT_PROG_UNLOAD")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  89bbc53a4dbb ("bpf: Reshuffle some parts of bpf/offload.c")

from the bpf-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc kernel/bpf/offload.c
index 190d9f9dc987,e87cab2ed710..000000000000
--- a/kernel/bpf/offload.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
@@@ -75,20 -74,124 +74,121 @@@ bpf_offload_find_netdev(struct net_devi
  	return rhashtable_lookup_fast(&offdevs, &netdev, offdevs_params);
  }
  
- int bpf_prog_offload_init(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr)
+ static int __bpf_offload_dev_netdev_register(struct bpf_offload_dev *offdev,
+ 					     struct net_device *netdev)
  {
  	struct bpf_offload_netdev *ondev;
- 	struct bpf_prog_offload *offload;
  	int err;
  
- 	if (attr->prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS &&
- 	    attr->prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP)
- 		return -EINVAL;
+ 	ondev = kzalloc(sizeof(*ondev), GFP_KERNEL);
+ 	if (!ondev)
+ 		return -ENOMEM;
  
- 	if (attr->prog_flags)
- 		return -EINVAL;
+ 	ondev->netdev = netdev;
+ 	ondev->offdev = offdev;
+ 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ondev->progs);
+ 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ondev->maps);
+ 
+ 	err = rhashtable_insert_fast(&offdevs, &ondev->l, offdevs_params);
+ 	if (err) {
+ 		netdev_warn(netdev, "failed to register for BPF offload\n");
+ 		goto err_free;
+ 	}
+ 
+ 	if (offdev)
+ 		list_add(&ondev->offdev_netdevs, &offdev->netdevs);
+ 	return 0;
+ 
+ err_free:
+ 	kfree(ondev);
+ 	return err;
+ }
+ 
+ static void __bpf_prog_offload_destroy(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+ {
+ 	struct bpf_prog_offload *offload = prog->aux->offload;
+ 
+ 	if (offload->dev_state)
+ 		offload->offdev->ops->destroy(prog);
+ 
 -	/* Make sure BPF_PROG_GET_NEXT_ID can't find this dead program */
 -	bpf_prog_free_id(prog, true);
 -
+ 	list_del_init(&offload->offloads);
+ 	kfree(offload);
+ 	prog->aux->offload = NULL;
+ }
+ 
+ static int bpf_map_offload_ndo(struct bpf_offloaded_map *offmap,
+ 			       enum bpf_netdev_command cmd)
+ {
+ 	struct netdev_bpf data = {};
+ 	struct net_device *netdev;
+ 
+ 	ASSERT_RTNL();
+ 
+ 	data.command = cmd;
+ 	data.offmap = offmap;
+ 	/* Caller must make sure netdev is valid */
+ 	netdev = offmap->netdev;
+ 
+ 	return netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf(netdev, &data);
+ }
+ 
+ static void __bpf_map_offload_destroy(struct bpf_offloaded_map *offmap)
+ {
+ 	WARN_ON(bpf_map_offload_ndo(offmap, BPF_OFFLOAD_MAP_FREE));
+ 	/* Make sure BPF_MAP_GET_NEXT_ID can't find this dead map */
+ 	bpf_map_free_id(&offmap->map, true);
+ 	list_del_init(&offmap->offloads);
+ 	offmap->netdev = NULL;
+ }
+ 
+ static void __bpf_offload_dev_netdev_unregister(struct bpf_offload_dev *offdev,
+ 						struct net_device *netdev)
+ {
+ 	struct bpf_offload_netdev *ondev, *altdev = NULL;
+ 	struct bpf_offloaded_map *offmap, *mtmp;
+ 	struct bpf_prog_offload *offload, *ptmp;
+ 
+ 	ASSERT_RTNL();
+ 
+ 	ondev = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&offdevs, &netdev, offdevs_params);
+ 	if (WARN_ON(!ondev))
+ 		return;
+ 
+ 	WARN_ON(rhashtable_remove_fast(&offdevs, &ondev->l, offdevs_params));
+ 
+ 	/* Try to move the objects to another netdev of the device */
+ 	if (offdev) {
+ 		list_del(&ondev->offdev_netdevs);
+ 		altdev = list_first_entry_or_null(&offdev->netdevs,
+ 						  struct bpf_offload_netdev,
+ 						  offdev_netdevs);
+ 	}
+ 
+ 	if (altdev) {
+ 		list_for_each_entry(offload, &ondev->progs, offloads)
+ 			offload->netdev = altdev->netdev;
+ 		list_splice_init(&ondev->progs, &altdev->progs);
+ 
+ 		list_for_each_entry(offmap, &ondev->maps, offloads)
+ 			offmap->netdev = altdev->netdev;
+ 		list_splice_init(&ondev->maps, &altdev->maps);
+ 	} else {
+ 		list_for_each_entry_safe(offload, ptmp, &ondev->progs, offloads)
+ 			__bpf_prog_offload_destroy(offload->prog);
+ 		list_for_each_entry_safe(offmap, mtmp, &ondev->maps, offloads)
+ 			__bpf_map_offload_destroy(offmap);
+ 	}
+ 
+ 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&ondev->progs));
+ 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&ondev->maps));
+ 	kfree(ondev);
+ }
+ 
+ static int __bpf_prog_dev_bound_init(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct net_device *netdev)
+ {
+ 	struct bpf_offload_netdev *ondev;
+ 	struct bpf_prog_offload *offload;
+ 	int err;
  
  	offload = kzalloc(sizeof(*offload), GFP_USER);
  	if (!offload)

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 484 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with Linus' tree

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 2:44 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>   kernel/bpf/offload.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   ef01f4e25c17 ("bpf: restore the ebpf program ID for BPF_AUDIT_UNLOAD and PERF_BPF_EVENT_PROG_UNLOAD")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
>   89bbc53a4dbb ("bpf: Reshuffle some parts of bpf/offload.c")
>
> from the bpf-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Yeah, that looks like a correct resolution, thank you!
Not sure what would've been the correct way to handle it in bpf-next
(except waiting for bpf tree to be merged)?

> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc kernel/bpf/offload.c
> index 190d9f9dc987,e87cab2ed710..000000000000
> --- a/kernel/bpf/offload.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
> @@@ -75,20 -74,124 +74,121 @@@ bpf_offload_find_netdev(struct net_devi
>         return rhashtable_lookup_fast(&offdevs, &netdev, offdevs_params);
>   }
>
> - int bpf_prog_offload_init(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr)
> + static int __bpf_offload_dev_netdev_register(struct bpf_offload_dev *offdev,
> +                                            struct net_device *netdev)
>   {
>         struct bpf_offload_netdev *ondev;
> -       struct bpf_prog_offload *offload;
>         int err;
>
> -       if (attr->prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS &&
> -           attr->prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP)
> -               return -EINVAL;
> +       ondev = kzalloc(sizeof(*ondev), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!ondev)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
>
> -       if (attr->prog_flags)
> -               return -EINVAL;
> +       ondev->netdev = netdev;
> +       ondev->offdev = offdev;
> +       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ondev->progs);
> +       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ondev->maps);
> +
> +       err = rhashtable_insert_fast(&offdevs, &ondev->l, offdevs_params);
> +       if (err) {
> +               netdev_warn(netdev, "failed to register for BPF offload\n");
> +               goto err_free;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (offdev)
> +               list_add(&ondev->offdev_netdevs, &offdev->netdevs);
> +       return 0;
> +
> + err_free:
> +       kfree(ondev);
> +       return err;
> + }
> +
> + static void __bpf_prog_offload_destroy(struct bpf_prog *prog)
> + {
> +       struct bpf_prog_offload *offload = prog->aux->offload;
> +
> +       if (offload->dev_state)
> +               offload->offdev->ops->destroy(prog);
> +
>  -      /* Make sure BPF_PROG_GET_NEXT_ID can't find this dead program */
>  -      bpf_prog_free_id(prog, true);
>  -
> +       list_del_init(&offload->offloads);
> +       kfree(offload);
> +       prog->aux->offload = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + static int bpf_map_offload_ndo(struct bpf_offloaded_map *offmap,
> +                              enum bpf_netdev_command cmd)
> + {
> +       struct netdev_bpf data = {};
> +       struct net_device *netdev;
> +
> +       ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> +       data.command = cmd;
> +       data.offmap = offmap;
> +       /* Caller must make sure netdev is valid */
> +       netdev = offmap->netdev;
> +
> +       return netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf(netdev, &data);
> + }
> +
> + static void __bpf_map_offload_destroy(struct bpf_offloaded_map *offmap)
> + {
> +       WARN_ON(bpf_map_offload_ndo(offmap, BPF_OFFLOAD_MAP_FREE));
> +       /* Make sure BPF_MAP_GET_NEXT_ID can't find this dead map */
> +       bpf_map_free_id(&offmap->map, true);
> +       list_del_init(&offmap->offloads);
> +       offmap->netdev = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + static void __bpf_offload_dev_netdev_unregister(struct bpf_offload_dev *offdev,
> +                                               struct net_device *netdev)
> + {
> +       struct bpf_offload_netdev *ondev, *altdev = NULL;
> +       struct bpf_offloaded_map *offmap, *mtmp;
> +       struct bpf_prog_offload *offload, *ptmp;
> +
> +       ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> +       ondev = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&offdevs, &netdev, offdevs_params);
> +       if (WARN_ON(!ondev))
> +               return;
> +
> +       WARN_ON(rhashtable_remove_fast(&offdevs, &ondev->l, offdevs_params));
> +
> +       /* Try to move the objects to another netdev of the device */
> +       if (offdev) {
> +               list_del(&ondev->offdev_netdevs);
> +               altdev = list_first_entry_or_null(&offdev->netdevs,
> +                                                 struct bpf_offload_netdev,
> +                                                 offdev_netdevs);
> +       }
> +
> +       if (altdev) {
> +               list_for_each_entry(offload, &ondev->progs, offloads)
> +                       offload->netdev = altdev->netdev;
> +               list_splice_init(&ondev->progs, &altdev->progs);
> +
> +               list_for_each_entry(offmap, &ondev->maps, offloads)
> +                       offmap->netdev = altdev->netdev;
> +               list_splice_init(&ondev->maps, &altdev->maps);
> +       } else {
> +               list_for_each_entry_safe(offload, ptmp, &ondev->progs, offloads)
> +                       __bpf_prog_offload_destroy(offload->prog);
> +               list_for_each_entry_safe(offmap, mtmp, &ondev->maps, offloads)
> +                       __bpf_map_offload_destroy(offmap);
> +       }
> +
> +       WARN_ON(!list_empty(&ondev->progs));
> +       WARN_ON(!list_empty(&ondev->maps));
> +       kfree(ondev);
> + }
> +
> + static int __bpf_prog_dev_bound_init(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct net_device *netdev)
> + {
> +       struct bpf_offload_netdev *ondev;
> +       struct bpf_prog_offload *offload;
> +       int err;
>
>         offload = kzalloc(sizeof(*offload), GFP_USER);
>         if (!offload)

linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with Linus' tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3319 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:

  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile

between commit:

  f91b256644ea ("selftests/bpf: Add test for kfunc module order")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  c3566ee6c66c ("selftests/bpf: remove test_tcp_check_syncookie")

from the bpf-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index 75016962f795,6d15355f1e62..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@@ -154,11 -153,9 +153,10 @@@ TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := with_addr.sh 
  
  # Compile but not part of 'make run_tests'
  TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = \
- 	flow_dissector_load test_flow_dissector test_tcp_check_syncookie_user \
- 	test_lirc_mode2_user xdping test_cpp runqslower bench bpf_testmod.ko \
- 	xskxceiver xdp_redirect_multi xdp_synproxy veristat xdp_hw_metadata \
- 	xdp_features bpf_test_no_cfi.ko bpf_test_modorder_x.ko \
- 	bpf_test_modorder_y.ko
+ 	flow_dissector_load test_flow_dissector	test_lirc_mode2_user xdping \
+ 	test_cpp runqslower bench bpf_testmod.ko xskxceiver xdp_redirect_multi \
 -	xdp_synproxy veristat xdp_hw_metadata xdp_features bpf_test_no_cfi.ko
++	xdp_synproxy veristat xdp_hw_metadata xdp_features bpf_test_no_cfi.ko \
++	bpf_test_modorder_x.ko bpf_test_modorder_y.ko
  
  TEST_GEN_FILES += liburandom_read.so urandom_read sign-file uprobe_multi
  
@@@ -301,22 -302,11 +303,24 @@@ $(OUTPUT)/bpf_testmod.ko: $(VMLINUX_BTF
  $(OUTPUT)/bpf_test_no_cfi.ko: $(VMLINUX_BTF) $(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) $(wildcard bpf_test_no_cfi/Makefile bpf_test_no_cfi/*.[ch])
  	$(call msg,MOD,,$@)
  	$(Q)$(RM) bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.ko # force re-compilation
- 	$(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) RESOLVE_BTFIDS=$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) -C bpf_test_no_cfi
+ 	$(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C bpf_test_no_cfi \
+ 		RESOLVE_BTFIDS=$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS)	 \
+ 		EXTRA_CFLAGS='' EXTRA_LDFLAGS=''
  	$(Q)cp bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.ko $@
  
 +$(OUTPUT)/bpf_test_modorder_x.ko: $(VMLINUX_BTF) $(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) $(wildcard bpf_test_modorder_x/Makefile bpf_test_modorder_x/*.[ch])
 +	$(call msg,MOD,,$@)
 +	$(Q)$(RM) bpf_test_modorder_x/bpf_test_modorder_x.ko # force re-compilation
 +	$(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) RESOLVE_BTFIDS=$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) -C bpf_test_modorder_x
 +	$(Q)cp bpf_test_modorder_x/bpf_test_modorder_x.ko $@
 +
 +$(OUTPUT)/bpf_test_modorder_y.ko: $(VMLINUX_BTF) $(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) $(wildcard bpf_test_modorder_y/Makefile bpf_test_modorder_y/*.[ch])
 +	$(call msg,MOD,,$@)
 +	$(Q)$(RM) bpf_test_modorder_y/bpf_test_modorder_y.ko # force re-compilation
 +	$(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) RESOLVE_BTFIDS=$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) -C bpf_test_modorder_y
 +	$(Q)cp bpf_test_modorder_y/bpf_test_modorder_y.ko $@
 +
 +
  DEFAULT_BPFTOOL := $(HOST_SCRATCH_DIR)/sbin/bpftool
  ifneq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
  CROSS_BPFTOOL := $(SCRATCH_DIR)/sbin/bpftool

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with Linus' tree

[Andrii Nakryiko]

On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 6:02 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>
> between commit:
>
>   f91b256644ea ("selftests/bpf: Add test for kfunc module order")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
>   c3566ee6c66c ("selftests/bpf: remove test_tcp_check_syncookie")
>
> from the bpf-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> index 75016962f795,6d15355f1e62..000000000000
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> @@@ -154,11 -153,9 +153,10 @@@ TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := with_addr.sh
>
>   # Compile but not part of 'make run_tests'
>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = \
> -       flow_dissector_load test_flow_dissector test_tcp_check_syncookie_user \
> -       test_lirc_mode2_user xdping test_cpp runqslower bench bpf_testmod.ko \
> -       xskxceiver xdp_redirect_multi xdp_synproxy veristat xdp_hw_metadata \
> -       xdp_features bpf_test_no_cfi.ko bpf_test_modorder_x.ko \
> -       bpf_test_modorder_y.ko
> +       flow_dissector_load test_flow_dissector test_lirc_mode2_user xdping \
> +       test_cpp runqslower bench bpf_testmod.ko xskxceiver xdp_redirect_multi \
>  -      xdp_synproxy veristat xdp_hw_metadata xdp_features bpf_test_no_cfi.ko
> ++      xdp_synproxy veristat xdp_hw_metadata xdp_features bpf_test_no_cfi.ko \
> ++      bpf_test_modorder_x.ko bpf_test_modorder_y.ko
>
>   TEST_GEN_FILES += liburandom_read.so urandom_read sign-file uprobe_multi
>
> @@@ -301,22 -302,11 +303,24 @@@ $(OUTPUT)/bpf_testmod.ko: $(VMLINUX_BTF
>   $(OUTPUT)/bpf_test_no_cfi.ko: $(VMLINUX_BTF) $(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) $(wildcard bpf_test_no_cfi/Makefile bpf_test_no_cfi/*.[ch])
>         $(call msg,MOD,,$@)
>         $(Q)$(RM) bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.ko # force re-compilation
> -       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) RESOLVE_BTFIDS=$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) -C bpf_test_no_cfi
> +       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C bpf_test_no_cfi \
> +               RESOLVE_BTFIDS=$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS)         \
> +               EXTRA_CFLAGS='' EXTRA_LDFLAGS=''
>         $(Q)cp bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.ko $@
>
>  +$(OUTPUT)/bpf_test_modorder_x.ko: $(VMLINUX_BTF) $(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) $(wildcard bpf_test_modorder_x/Makefile bpf_test_modorder_x/*.[ch])
>  +      $(call msg,MOD,,$@)
>  +      $(Q)$(RM) bpf_test_modorder_x/bpf_test_modorder_x.ko # force re-compilation
>  +      $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) RESOLVE_BTFIDS=$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) -C bpf_test_modorder_x
>  +      $(Q)cp bpf_test_modorder_x/bpf_test_modorder_x.ko $@
>  +
>  +$(OUTPUT)/bpf_test_modorder_y.ko: $(VMLINUX_BTF) $(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) $(wildcard bpf_test_modorder_y/Makefile bpf_test_modorder_y/*.[ch])
>  +      $(call msg,MOD,,$@)
>  +      $(Q)$(RM) bpf_test_modorder_y/bpf_test_modorder_y.ko # force re-compilation
>  +      $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) RESOLVE_BTFIDS=$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) -C bpf_test_modorder_y

This and above will need the EXTRA_CFLAGS and EXTRA_LDFLAGS additions
that we have for bpf_test_no_cfi.ko. For now, I'll unland the patch
set to avoid this conflict and breakage. We'll reapply once bpf is
merged into bpf-next. Viktor, please rebase to take into account these
new modorder.ko additions.


>  +      $(Q)cp bpf_test_modorder_y/bpf_test_modorder_y.ko $@
>  +
>  +
>   DEFAULT_BPFTOOL := $(HOST_SCRATCH_DIR)/sbin/bpftool
>   ifneq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
>   CROSS_BPFTOOL := $(SCRATCH_DIR)/sbin/bpftool

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with Linus' tree

[Viktor Malik]

On 10/22/24 05:07, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 6:02 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
>>
>>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>>   f91b256644ea ("selftests/bpf: Add test for kfunc module order")
>>
>> from Linus' tree and commit:
>>
>>   c3566ee6c66c ("selftests/bpf: remove test_tcp_check_syncookie")
>>
>> from the bpf-next tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Stephen Rothwell
>>
>> diff --cc tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>> index 75016962f795,6d15355f1e62..000000000000
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>> @@@ -154,11 -153,9 +153,10 @@@ TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := with_addr.sh
>>
>>   # Compile but not part of 'make run_tests'
>>   TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = \
>> -       flow_dissector_load test_flow_dissector test_tcp_check_syncookie_user \
>> -       test_lirc_mode2_user xdping test_cpp runqslower bench bpf_testmod.ko \
>> -       xskxceiver xdp_redirect_multi xdp_synproxy veristat xdp_hw_metadata \
>> -       xdp_features bpf_test_no_cfi.ko bpf_test_modorder_x.ko \
>> -       bpf_test_modorder_y.ko
>> +       flow_dissector_load test_flow_dissector test_lirc_mode2_user xdping \
>> +       test_cpp runqslower bench bpf_testmod.ko xskxceiver xdp_redirect_multi \
>>  -      xdp_synproxy veristat xdp_hw_metadata xdp_features bpf_test_no_cfi.ko
>> ++      xdp_synproxy veristat xdp_hw_metadata xdp_features bpf_test_no_cfi.ko \
>> ++      bpf_test_modorder_x.ko bpf_test_modorder_y.ko
>>
>>   TEST_GEN_FILES += liburandom_read.so urandom_read sign-file uprobe_multi
>>
>> @@@ -301,22 -302,11 +303,24 @@@ $(OUTPUT)/bpf_testmod.ko: $(VMLINUX_BTF
>>   $(OUTPUT)/bpf_test_no_cfi.ko: $(VMLINUX_BTF) $(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) $(wildcard bpf_test_no_cfi/Makefile bpf_test_no_cfi/*.[ch])
>>         $(call msg,MOD,,$@)
>>         $(Q)$(RM) bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.ko # force re-compilation
>> -       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) RESOLVE_BTFIDS=$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) -C bpf_test_no_cfi
>> +       $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C bpf_test_no_cfi \
>> +               RESOLVE_BTFIDS=$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS)         \
>> +               EXTRA_CFLAGS='' EXTRA_LDFLAGS=''
>>         $(Q)cp bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.ko $@
>>
>>  +$(OUTPUT)/bpf_test_modorder_x.ko: $(VMLINUX_BTF) $(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) $(wildcard bpf_test_modorder_x/Makefile bpf_test_modorder_x/*.[ch])
>>  +      $(call msg,MOD,,$@)
>>  +      $(Q)$(RM) bpf_test_modorder_x/bpf_test_modorder_x.ko # force re-compilation
>>  +      $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) RESOLVE_BTFIDS=$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) -C bpf_test_modorder_x
>>  +      $(Q)cp bpf_test_modorder_x/bpf_test_modorder_x.ko $@
>>  +
>>  +$(OUTPUT)/bpf_test_modorder_y.ko: $(VMLINUX_BTF) $(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) $(wildcard bpf_test_modorder_y/Makefile bpf_test_modorder_y/*.[ch])
>>  +      $(call msg,MOD,,$@)
>>  +      $(Q)$(RM) bpf_test_modorder_y/bpf_test_modorder_y.ko # force re-compilation
>>  +      $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) RESOLVE_BTFIDS=$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) -C bpf_test_modorder_y
> 
> This and above will need the EXTRA_CFLAGS and EXTRA_LDFLAGS additions
> that we have for bpf_test_no_cfi.ko. For now, I'll unland the patch
> set to avoid this conflict and breakage. We'll reapply once bpf is
> merged into bpf-next. Viktor, please rebase to take into account these
> new modorder.ko additions.

Thanks Andrii.

I rebased my patches on top of the bpf tree, please let me know when I
can resend them for bpf-next.

Viktor

> 
> 
>>  +      $(Q)cp bpf_test_modorder_y/bpf_test_modorder_y.ko $@
>>  +
>>  +
>>   DEFAULT_BPFTOOL := $(HOST_SCRATCH_DIR)/sbin/bpftool
>>   ifneq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
>>   CROSS_BPFTOOL := $(SCRATCH_DIR)/sbin/bpftool
>