From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 00/16] bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in bpf_local_storage
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 00:42:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230306084216.3186830-1-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
This set is to use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in bpf_local_storage.
The primary motivation is to solve the deadlock/recursion issue
when bpf_task_storage is used in a bpf tracing prog [1]. This set
also comes with a micro-benchmark to test the storage creation.
Patch 1 to 4 are some general cleanup after bpf_local_storage
has been extended to multiple kernel objects (sk, task, inode,
and then cgrp).
Patch 5 to 11 is to refactor the memory free logic into the new
bpf_selem_free() and bpf_local_storage_free() functions. Together
with the existing bpf_selem_alloc() and bpf_local_storage_alloc(),
it should provide an easier way to change the alloc/free path in
the future.
Patch 12 to 13 is to use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free.
The remaining patches are selftests and benchmark.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221118190109.1512674-1-namhyung@kernel.org/
Martin KaFai Lau (16):
bpf: Move a few bpf_local_storage functions to static scope
bpf: Refactor codes into bpf_local_storage_destroy
bpf: Remove __bpf_local_storage_map_alloc
bpf: Remove the preceding __ from __bpf_selem_unlink_storage
bpf: Remember smap in bpf_local_storage
bpf: Repurpose use_trace_rcu to reuse_now in bpf_local_storage
bpf: Remove bpf_selem_free_fields*_rcu
bpf: Add bpf_selem_free_rcu callback
bpf: Add bpf_selem_free()
bpf: Add bpf_local_storage_rcu callback
bpf: Add bpf_local_storage_free()
bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in bpf_selem_alloc/free
bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free for bpf_local_storage
selftests/bpf: Replace CHECK with ASSERT in test_local_storage
selftests/bpf: Check freeing sk->sk_local_storage with
sk_local_storage->smap is NULL
selftests/bpf: Add local-storage-create benchmark
include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h | 22 +-
include/linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h | 5 +
kernel/bpf/bpf_cgrp_storage.c | 11 +-
kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c | 10 +-
kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 292 ++++++++++--------
kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c | 11 +-
net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c | 12 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c | 2 +
.../bpf/benchs/bench_local_storage_create.c | 141 +++++++++
.../bpf/prog_tests/test_local_storage.c | 49 ++-
.../bpf/progs/bench_local_storage_create.c | 57 ++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage.c | 29 +-
13 files changed, 429 insertions(+), 214 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_local_storage_create.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bench_local_storage_create.c
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-06 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-06 8:42 Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/16] bpf: Move a few bpf_local_storage functions to static scope Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/16] bpf: Refactor codes into bpf_local_storage_destroy Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/16] bpf: Remove __bpf_local_storage_map_alloc Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/16] bpf: Remove the preceding __ from __bpf_selem_unlink_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/16] bpf: Remember smap in bpf_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/16] bpf: Repurpose use_trace_rcu to reuse_now " Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/16] bpf: Remove bpf_selem_free_fields*_rcu Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-07 1:35 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/16] bpf: Add bpf_selem_free_rcu callback Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/16] bpf: Add bpf_selem_free() Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:53 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/16] bpf: Add bpf_local_storage_rcu callback Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/16] bpf: Add bpf_local_storage_free() Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/16] bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in bpf_selem_alloc/free Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-07 3:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-08 0:38 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/16] bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free for bpf_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/16] selftests/bpf: Replace CHECK with ASSERT in test_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 1:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-08 1:24 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/16] selftests/bpf: Check freeing sk->sk_local_storage with sk_local_storage->smap is NULL Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/16] selftests/bpf: Add local-storage-create benchmark Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230306084216.3186830-1-martin.lau@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox