From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 05/16] bpf: Remember smap in bpf_local_storage
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 00:42:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230306084216.3186830-6-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230306084216.3186830-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
This patch remembers which smap triggers the allocation
of a 'struct bpf_local_storage' object. The local_storage is
allocated during the very first selem added to the owner.
The smap pointer is needed when using the bpf_mem_cache_free
in a later patch because it needs to free to the correct
smap's bpf_mem_alloc object.
When a selem is being removed, it needs to check if it is
the selem that triggers the creation of the local_storage.
If it is, the local_storage->smap pointer will be reset to NULL.
This NULL reset is done under the local_storage->lock in
bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock() when a selem is being removed.
Also note that the local_storage may not go away even
local_storage->smap is NULL because there may be other
selem still stored in the local_storage.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h | 1 +
kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
index c8dcf6f40497..31ee681b4c65 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ struct bpf_local_storage_elem {
struct bpf_local_storage {
struct bpf_local_storage_data __rcu *cache[BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_CACHE_SIZE];
+ struct bpf_local_storage_map __rcu *smap;
struct hlist_head list; /* List of bpf_local_storage_elem */
void *owner; /* The object that owns the above "list" of
* bpf_local_storage_elem.
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index fef75beaf66d..c8ca1886374e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -213,6 +213,9 @@ static bool bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage *local_stor
kfree_rcu(selem, rcu);
}
+ if (rcu_access_pointer(local_storage->smap) == smap)
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(local_storage->smap, NULL);
+
return free_local_storage;
}
@@ -368,6 +371,7 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
goto uncharge;
}
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(storage->smap, smap);
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&storage->list);
raw_spin_lock_init(&storage->lock);
storage->owner = owner;
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-06 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-06 8:42 [PATCH bpf-next 00/16] bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in bpf_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/16] bpf: Move a few bpf_local_storage functions to static scope Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/16] bpf: Refactor codes into bpf_local_storage_destroy Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/16] bpf: Remove __bpf_local_storage_map_alloc Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/16] bpf: Remove the preceding __ from __bpf_selem_unlink_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/16] bpf: Repurpose use_trace_rcu to reuse_now in bpf_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/16] bpf: Remove bpf_selem_free_fields*_rcu Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-07 1:35 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/16] bpf: Add bpf_selem_free_rcu callback Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/16] bpf: Add bpf_selem_free() Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:53 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/16] bpf: Add bpf_local_storage_rcu callback Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/16] bpf: Add bpf_local_storage_free() Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/16] bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in bpf_selem_alloc/free Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-07 3:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-08 0:38 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/16] bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free for bpf_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/16] selftests/bpf: Replace CHECK with ASSERT in test_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 1:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-08 1:24 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/16] selftests/bpf: Check freeing sk->sk_local_storage with sk_local_storage->smap is NULL Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-06 8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/16] selftests/bpf: Add local-storage-create benchmark Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230306084216.3186830-6-martin.lau@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox