From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for allow_ptr_leaks
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 08:39:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230818083920.3771-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230818083920.3771-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
- Without prev commit
$ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=tc_bpf
#232/1 tc_bpf/tc_bpf_root:OK
test_tc_bpf_non_root:PASS:set_cap_bpf_cap_net_admin 0 nsec
test_tc_bpf_non_root:PASS:disable_cap_sys_admin 0 nsec
0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; if ((long)(iph + 1) > (long)skb->data_end)
0: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 +80) ; R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R2_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0)
; struct iphdr *iph = (void *)(long)skb->data + sizeof(struct ethhdr);
1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +76) ; R1_w=pkt(off=0,r=0,imm=0)
; if ((long)(iph + 1) > (long)skb->data_end)
2: (07) r1 += 34 ; R1_w=pkt(off=34,r=0,imm=0)
3: (b4) w0 = 1 ; R0_w=1
4: (2d) if r1 > r2 goto pc+1
R2 pointer comparison prohibited
processed 5 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
test_tc_bpf_non_root:FAIL:test_tc_bpf__open_and_load unexpected error: -13
#233/2 tc_bpf_non_root:FAIL
- With prev commit
$ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=tc_bpf
#232/1 tc_bpf/tc_bpf_root:OK
#232/2 tc_bpf/tc_bpf_non_root:OK
#232 tc_bpf:OK
Summary: 1/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c | 14 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c
index e873766..48b5553 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include <test_progs.h>
#include <linux/pkt_cls.h>
+#include "cap_helpers.h"
#include "test_tc_bpf.skel.h"
#define LO_IFINDEX 1
@@ -327,7 +328,7 @@ static int test_tc_bpf_api(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int fd)
return 0;
}
-void test_tc_bpf(void)
+void tc_bpf_root(void)
{
DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, hook, .ifindex = LO_IFINDEX,
.attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS);
@@ -393,3 +394,36 @@ void test_tc_bpf(void)
}
test_tc_bpf__destroy(skel);
}
+
+void tc_bpf_non_root(void)
+{
+ struct test_tc_bpf *skel = NULL;
+ __u64 caps = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* In case CAP_BPF and CAP_PERFMON is not set */
+ ret = cap_enable_effective(1ULL << CAP_BPF | 1ULL << CAP_NET_ADMIN, &caps);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "set_cap_bpf_cap_net_admin"))
+ return;
+ ret = cap_disable_effective(1ULL << CAP_SYS_ADMIN | 1ULL << CAP_PERFMON, NULL);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "disable_cap_sys_admin"))
+ goto restore_cap;
+
+ skel = test_tc_bpf__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_tc_bpf__open_and_load"))
+ goto restore_cap;
+
+ test_tc_bpf__destroy(skel);
+
+restore_cap:
+ if (caps)
+ cap_enable_effective(caps, NULL);
+}
+
+void test_tc_bpf(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("tc_bpf_root"))
+ tc_bpf_root();
+ if (test__start_subtest("tc_bpf_non_root"))
+ tc_bpf_non_root();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c
index d28ca8d..3e0f218 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/pkt_cls.h>
+#include <linux/ip.h>
+#include <linux/if_ether.h>
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
@@ -10,3 +13,14 @@ int cls(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
return 0;
}
+
+/* Prog to verify tc-bpf without cap_sys_admin and cap_perfmon */
+SEC("tcx/ingress")
+int pkt_ptr(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct iphdr *iph = (void *)(long)skb->data + sizeof(struct ethhdr);
+
+ if ((long)(iph + 1) > (long)skb->data_end)
+ return TC_ACT_STOLEN;
+ return TC_ACT_OK;
+}
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-18 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-18 8:39 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Fix an issue in verifing allow_ptr_leaks Yafang Shao
2023-08-18 8:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Fix issue in verifying allow_ptr_leaks Yafang Shao
2023-08-21 12:33 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-08-18 8:39 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2023-08-21 22:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for allow_ptr_leaks Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-22 2:42 ` Yafang Shao
2023-08-22 3:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-22 3:44 ` Yafang Shao
2023-08-23 9:44 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-08-23 15:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230818083920.3771-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox